Inventory · head to head
Acumatica vs Materialise Magics

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acumatica pricing is not published; the vendor directs buyers to a pricing review or an industry calculator instead; Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- They diverge on capability: Acumatica covers Financial management, Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acumatica and Materialise Magics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acumatica | Materialise Magics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
| Category | Inventory | Manufacturing |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acumatica
- Financial management
- Inventory
- Order management
- Manufacturing
- CRM
- Acumatica mobile
- Business intelligence
- Custom integrations
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acumatica
- Construction industry ERPnot Materialise Magics
- Manufacturing business managementnot Materialise Magics
- Distribution operationsnot Materialise Magics
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot Acumatica
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot Acumatica
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot Acumatica
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot Acumatica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acumatica
- Pricing is not published; the vendor directs buyers to a pricing review or an industry calculator instead
- Cost is driven by transaction volume, data storage and resource levels, so spend rises with business activity rather than staying fixed
- Charged per application implemented, so adding a module changes the price
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acumatica
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Acumatica review.
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Questions people ask
- Is Acumatica or Materialise Magics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acumatica starts at On request and Materialise Magics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acumatica or Materialise Magics?
- Acumatica starts at On request and Materialise Magics at On request.
- Does Acumatica or Materialise Magics run on more platforms?
- Acumatica runs on Web. Materialise Magics runs on Windows.
- What is Acumatica best used for?
- Acumatica is most often used for construction industry erp, manufacturing business management, distribution operations. Of those, construction industry erp and manufacturing business management are not what Materialise Magics is typically brought in for.
- What can Acumatica do that Materialise Magics cannot?
- Acumatica covers Financial management, Inventory, Order management, Manufacturing. Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acumatica: How does Acumatica's pricing model work compared to traditional per-seat ERP systems?
Acumatica charges based primarily on the number of applications you implement, not user seats. Pricing adjusts based on business usage and resources (transaction volumes, user count, data storage needs) plus your chosen deployment license type. Unlimited users are included; you only pay for the functionality you need.
SourceMaterialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
Acumatica: Are there separate pricing calculators for different industries?
Yes, Acumatica offers industry-specific pricing calculators for Construction, Manufacturing, and Distribution to help estimate costs. You can also schedule a custom pricing review with an Acumatica partner for a tailored assessment.
SourceMaterialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Acumatica: What happens if my business usage and data storage needs grow over time?
Acumatica allows you to adjust resource levels and data storage as you add users or expand usage. The transparent pricing model ensures you always know your costs, and you do not pay overages for unused features or unnecessary functionality.
SourceMaterialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Acumatica vs Katana
- Acumatica vs DEAR Inventory
- Acumatica vs Brightpearl
- Acumatica vs Finale Inventory
- Acumatica vs Skubana
- Acumatica vs Fishbowl Inventory
- Acumatica vs Megaventory
- Acumatica vs Unleashed
- Acumatica vs SOS Inventory
- Acumatica vs ERPNext
- Acumatica vs Spocket
- Acumatica vs Shopify Inventory
- Acumatica vs Quartzy
- Acumatica vs Snipe-IT
- Acumatica vs Sortly
- Acumatica vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Acumatica vs Oqton
- Acumatica vs GrabCAD Print
- Acumatica vs Formlabs PreForm
- Acumatica vs Simplify3D
- Acumatica vs Markforged Eiger
- Acumatica vs SolidWorks
- Acumatica vs AVEVA System Platform
- Acumatica vs 3YOURMIND
- Acumatica vs Aras Innovator
- Acumatica vs Authentise
- Acumatica vs Dyndrite
- Acumatica vs QAD Redzone
- Acumatica vs Seeq
- Acumatica vs Sensemore
- Acumatica vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Acumatica vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Katana
- Materialise Magics vs DEAR Inventory
- Materialise Magics vs Brightpearl
- Materialise Magics vs Finale Inventory
- Materialise Magics vs Skubana
- Materialise Magics vs Fishbowl Inventory
- Materialise Magics vs Megaventory
- Materialise Magics vs Unleashed
- Materialise Magics vs SOS Inventory
- Materialise Magics vs ERPNext
- Materialise Magics vs Spocket
- Materialise Magics vs Shopify Inventory
- Materialise Magics vs Quartzy
- Materialise Magics vs Snipe-IT
- Materialise Magics vs Sortly
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner

