Software · head to head
AB Tasty vs Whatagraph
The short version
- Only Whatagraph has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: AB Tasty pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation; Whatagraph the entry Max plan starts at 699 EUR per month and is billed annually, with no monthly billing option shown
- They diverge on capability: AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Whatagraph covers Automated reporting.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AB Tasty and Whatagraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | AB Tasty | Whatagraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €500/month | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Mobile, Api |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AB Tasty
- A/B testing
- Multivariate testing
- Personalization
- Visual editor
- Salesforce
- SSL encryption
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
Only in Whatagraph
- Automated reporting
- Multi-channel integration
- Custom dashboards
- Data visualization
- PDF reports
- Real-time updates
- Historical tracking
- Anomaly detection
Both cover
- Google Analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AB Tasty
- A/B and multivariate testing on web and mobilenot Whatagraph
- Feature flagging and progressive rolloutsnot Whatagraph
- Personalising content for identified and anonymous visitorsnot Whatagraph
- Search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommercenot Whatagraph
- Conversion optimisation experiments across channelsnot Whatagraph
Whatagraph
- Automated client marketing reports for agenciesnot AB Tasty
- Blending data from multiple ad platforms into one dashboardnot AB Tasty
- White-labelled reporting under an agency's own brandingnot AB Tasty
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AB Tasty
- Pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation
Whatagraph
- The entry Max plan starts at 699 EUR per month and is billed annually, with no monthly billing option shown
- Only two plans exist and the Prime plan is custom priced with no published rate
- Public API access, transfer to BigQuery and Looker, a custom report domain and premium integrations all require the Prime plan
- Data sources are metered as credits at 1 credit per connected data account, so each additional ad account consumes quota
- Extra credits can be bought only up to the next plan threshold, after which an upgrade is required
- Moving to either the Max or Prime plan requires booking a call with sales rather than self-serve upgrade
- The free trial is 14 days
Pricing, plan by plan
AB Tasty
€500/month- Standard$500/month
- A/B testing
- Basic personalization
- Analytics
Whatagraph
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 data sources
- Basic dashboards
- Daily updates
- Starter$99/month
- Up to 10 data sources
- Advanced dashboards
- Hourly updates
- Professional$299/month
- Unlimited data sources
- Real-time updates
- White-label
Which should you pick?
Choose Whatagraph if
- You need automated reporting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want multi-channel integration.
Questions people ask
- Is AB Tasty or Whatagraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Whatagraph at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AB Tasty or Whatagraph?
- Whatagraph has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €500/month for AB Tasty and Free for Whatagraph.
- Does AB Tasty or Whatagraph run on more platforms?
- AB Tasty runs on Web. Whatagraph runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use Whatagraph for free?
- Yes. Whatagraph has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. AB Tasty starts at €500/month.
- What is AB Tasty best used for?
- AB Tasty is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile, feature flagging and progressive rollouts, personalising content for identified and anonymous visitors, search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommerce. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile and feature flagging and progressive rollouts are not what Whatagraph is typically brought in for.
- What can AB Tasty do that Whatagraph cannot?
- AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Personalization, Visual editor. Whatagraph covers Automated reporting, Multi-channel integration, Custom dashboards, Data visualization. Both handle Google Analytics.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- AB Tasty vs Crazy Egg
- AB Tasty vs Ruler Analytics
- AB Tasty vs Northbeam
- AB Tasty vs VWO
- AB Tasty vs Attribution
- AB Tasty vs Countly
- AB Tasty vs Dreamdata
- AB Tasty vs Google Analytics
- AB Tasty vs Triple Whale
- AB Tasty vs Adobe Analytics
- AB Tasty vs Adverity
- AB Tasty vs Convert
- AB Tasty vs Datorama
- AB Tasty vs Fathom Analytics
- AB Tasty vs Funnel.io
- AB Tasty vs Google Optimize
- AB Tasty vs Improvado
- AB Tasty vs June
- Whatagraph vs Crazy Egg
- Whatagraph vs Ruler Analytics
- Whatagraph vs Northbeam
- Whatagraph vs VWO
- Whatagraph vs Attribution
- Whatagraph vs Countly
- Whatagraph vs Dreamdata
- Whatagraph vs Google Analytics
- Whatagraph vs Triple Whale
- Whatagraph vs Adobe Analytics
- Whatagraph vs Adverity
- Whatagraph vs Convert
- Whatagraph vs Datorama
- Whatagraph vs Fathom Analytics
- Whatagraph vs Funnel.io
- Whatagraph vs Google Optimize
- Whatagraph vs Improvado
- Whatagraph vs June


