TuneCorevs
DistroKid


DistroKid: If you want a single, simpler pricing model rather than two parallel structures

Music distribution owned by Believe, offering both a 0%-royalty annual subscription and an older pay-per-release model side by side
As of 1 September 2026, TuneCore's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A distributor that, unlike DistroKid, still runs two pricing models in parallel: unlimited-upload annual subscriptions from $24. Softwr lists it under Music. TuneCore is made by TuneCore (a Believe company), available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
TuneCore distributes music to Spotify, Apple Music and over 150 other stores, and provides royalty collection, publishing administration and sync licensing services. It has been owned by Believe, a French independent music company, since 2015, which places it under the same corporate umbrella as several other artist services businesses rather than operating as a fully independent distributor. What distinguishes it commercially is that it still sells two incompatible pricing structures at once. The current default is an unlimited annual subscription, priced at $24.99 (Rising Artist), $44.99 (Breakout Artist) or $54.99 (Professional), under which the artist keeps 100% of streaming store royalties. Alongside that, an older pay-per-release model persists, where a single costs $24.99 a year and an album $44.99 the first year rising to $56.49 on renewal, charged per release rather than as a flat catalogue-wide fee. A musician comparing TuneCore to DistroKid needs to check which of TuneCore’s own two models they are being quoted, since the economics differ meaningfully depending on how many releases they put out per year. Buyers are independent artists and small labels who release frequently enough that unlimited-upload subscriptions make sense, or infrequent releasers who might prefer paying per release rather than an annual platform fee. The trade-off, as with DistroKid, is that non-streaming revenue is not commission-free: TuneCore takes 20% of social platform monetisation and 20% of collected publishing royalties.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about TuneCore.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


DistroKid: If you want a single, simpler pricing model rather than two parallel structures


CD Baby: If you prefer a one-time fee with a permanent royalty cut over any kind of recurring or per-release charge
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Rising Artist (subscription)
$24.99 /yr
Breakout Artist (subscription)
$44.99 /yr
Professional (subscription)
$54.99 /yr
Pay-per-release: Single
$24.99 /yr
Pay-per-release: Album
$44.99 /yr
Capabilities
Unlimited uploads on subscription plans
No cap on releases under Rising Artist, Breakout Artist or Professional tiers
Pay-per-release legacy option
Per-single and per-album pricing for artists who release infrequently
0% royalty commission on streaming stores
Artists keep 100% of core streaming royalties under both pricing models
Publishing administration
Collection of mechanical and performance royalties, at a 20% commission
Sync licensing marketplace
Submission of tracks for use in film, TV and advertising placements
Multiple artist profile support
Additional artist names available for an extra annual fee per name
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
If you release more than one or two records a year, the unlimited subscription is usually cheaper; infrequent releasers may prefer paying per release.
Believe, a French independent music company, has owned TuneCore since 2015.
No, on both the subscription and pay-per-release models you keep 100% of streaming store royalties; social platforms and publishing administration are commissioned separately.
Keep looking
Music distribution charging an upfront per-release fee plus a permanent 9% commission on royalties, now owned by Universal Music Group
Flat annual subscription music distribution where artists keep 100% of streaming royalties
AI mastering and music distribution, sold as separate mastering, distribution and bundled Studio subscriptions
Avid’s music notation software, now sold primarily on subscription with perpetual licences still available at higher upfront cost
Steinberg’s notation software, still sold as a perpetual licence on desktop with subscription only offered on iPad
Tracker sequencer with a vertical timeline, keyboard entry and a demo limited only by rendering
Single-window workstation with album mastering built into the same project, now owned by Fender
AI music generation platform for creating songs from text prompts
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for TuneCore, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Free digital audio workstation bundled with macOS and iOS, with no paid tier or upgrade path of its own
Open source, no licence feeFree, browser and mobile-based collaborative DAW, with optional Pro and Max membership tiers for sample libraries and extras
Per user per yearAI mastering and music distribution, sold as separate mastering, distribution and bundled Studio subscriptions
Per user per month, separate mastering and distribution subscriptionsAvid digital audio workstation with four tiers gated by track count and simultaneous I/O rather than by feature
Per user per yearFlat annual subscription music distribution where artists keep 100% of streaming royalties
One-time purchaseFree, open source notation software under the GPL, distinct from the separate paid MuseScore.com and MuseSounds subscriptions
Open source, no licence feeSteinberg’s notation software, still sold as a perpetual licence on desktop with subscription only offered on iPad
One-time purchaseMusic distribution charging an upfront per-release fee plus a permanent 9% commission on royalties, now owned by Universal Music Group
One-time purchase plus ongoing commission