Music · head to head
LANDR vs TuneCore

LANDR
Music
AI mastering and music distribution, sold as separate mastering, distribution and bundled Studio subscriptions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

TuneCore
Music
Music distribution owned by Believe, offering both a 0%-royalty annual subscription and an older pay-per-release model side by side
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LANDR mastering and distribution are separate subscription lines, so a producer wanting both is typically paying for two products, not one, unless they specifically choose the bundled Studio plan.; TuneCore tuneCore runs two different pricing structures side by side, and it is easy for a buyer to be quoted or compare against the wrong one for their release frequency.
- They diverge on capability: LANDR covers AI mastering, TuneCore covers Unlimited uploads on subscription plans.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LANDR and TuneCore actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Music).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LANDR
- AI mastering
- Digital distribution
- 100 percent royalty retention
- Pay-per-track mastering
- Sample packs and plugins
- Collaboration tools
Only in TuneCore
- Unlimited uploads on subscription plans
- Pay-per-release legacy option
- 0% royalty commission on streaming stores
- Publishing administration
- Sync licensing marketplace
- Multiple artist profile support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LANDR
- An independent producer wanting fast, low-cost mastering for demos or lower-stakes releasesnot TuneCore
- A self-releasing artist who wants distribution to Spotify and Apple Music without a label or aggregator contractnot TuneCore
- A producer wanting to pay for a single mastered track without committing to a subscriptionnot TuneCore
- An artist who wants sample packs, mastering and distribution bundled together under one Studio plannot TuneCore
TuneCore
- A prolific artist releasing many singles a year who benefits from an unlimited-upload subscription over per-release feesnot LANDR
- An infrequent releaser who prefers paying only for the specific single or album they put out rather than an annual platform feenot LANDR
- An artist wanting publishing administration and sync licensing submission alongside distribution, from one vendornot LANDR
- A songwriter managing multiple artist identities who is willing to pay the per-name annual fee for each additional profilenot LANDR
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LANDR
- Mastering and distribution are separate subscription lines, so a producer wanting both is typically paying for two products, not one, unless they specifically choose the bundled Studio plan.
- AI mastering is generally regarded by working audio engineers as producing a less considered, more generic result than a human mastering engineer for a release meant to matter to an artist career.
- The lowest mastering tier caps output at lower-resolution MP3, so getting WAV and HD WAV masters requires the more expensive Pro tier.
- Distribution plans are billed annually, which is a less flexible commitment than platforms offering month-to-month or per-release distribution pricing.
- Frequent promotional discounting on LANDR pricing makes the real ongoing renewal price harder to predict from marketing pages alone.
TuneCore
- TuneCore runs two different pricing structures side by side, and it is easy for a buyer to be quoted or compare against the wrong one for their release frequency.
- The pay-per-release album price rises significantly on renewal, from $44.99 in year one to $56.49 in subsequent years, which is not obvious from the headline price.
- As with DistroKid, the 0%-royalty claim covers streaming stores only; social monetisation and publishing administration both carry a 20% commission.
- Ownership by Believe means TuneCore’s roadmap and priorities sit within a larger corporate group whose other artist-services brands can create channel conflicts or bundling pressure.
- Additional artist profiles carry a recurring annual fee, so an artist running several projects under different names pays materially more than the headline single-artist price suggests.
Pricing, plan by plan
LANDR
On request- Mastering Basic$4/month
- Unlimited lower-resolution MP3 masters
- Digital distribution not included
- Mastering Pro$25/month
- Unlimited WAV and HD WAV masters
- Highest mastering resolution tier
- Distribution Basic$24/year
- Distribution to major streaming platforms
- Billed separately from mastering plans
- Distribution Pro$45/year
- Higher-tier distribution features
- 100 percent royalty retention
TuneCore
On request- Rising Artist (subscription)$24.99/year
- Unlimited uploads, 0% royalty commission on streaming
- Breakout Artist (subscription)$44.99/year
- Unlimited uploads, additional distribution features
- Professional (subscription)$54.99/year
- Unlimited uploads, full feature set
- Pay-per-release: Single$24.99/year
- One track, renews annually to keep it live
Which should you pick?
Choose TuneCore if
- You need unlimited uploads on subscription plans.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pay-per-release legacy option.
Questions people ask
- Is LANDR or TuneCore better?
- Neither clearly leads. LANDR starts at On request and TuneCore at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LANDR or TuneCore?
- LANDR starts at On request and TuneCore at On request.
- Does LANDR or TuneCore run on more platforms?
- LANDR runs on Web. TuneCore runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is LANDR best used for?
- LANDR is most often used for an independent producer wanting fast, low-cost mastering for demos or lower-stakes releases, a self-releasing artist who wants distribution to spotify and apple music without a label or aggregator contract, a producer wanting to pay for a single mastered track without committing to a subscription, an artist who wants sample packs, mastering and distribution bundled together under one studio plan. Of those, an independent producer wanting fast, low-cost mastering for demos or lower-stakes releases and a self-releasing artist who wants distribution to spotify and apple music without a label or aggregator contract are not what TuneCore is typically brought in for.
- What can LANDR do that TuneCore cannot?
- LANDR covers AI mastering, Digital distribution, 100 percent royalty retention, Pay-per-track mastering. TuneCore covers Unlimited uploads on subscription plans, Pay-per-release legacy option, 0% royalty commission on streaming stores, Publishing administration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LANDR: Do mastering and distribution cost the same subscription?
No, they are billed as separate plans; a bundled Studio plan combines them along with sample packs and plugins.
TuneCore: Which pricing model should I use, subscription or pay-per-release?
If you release more than one or two records a year, the unlimited subscription is usually cheaper; infrequent releasers may prefer paying per release.
LANDR: Do I keep 100 percent of royalties through LANDR distribution?
Yes, artists retain full royalties from tracks distributed through LANDR.
TuneCore: Who owns TuneCore?
Believe, a French independent music company, has owned TuneCore since 2015.
LANDR: Can I master a single track without a subscription?
Yes, a pay-per-track option is available for around 9.99 USD per master.
TuneCore: Does TuneCore take a cut of streaming royalties?
No, on both the subscription and pay-per-release models you keep 100% of streaming store royalties; social platforms and publishing administration are commissioned separately.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- LANDR vs DistroKid
- LANDR vs Splice
- LANDR vs CD Baby
- LANDR vs Pro Tools
- LANDR vs MuseScore
- LANDR vs Soundtrap
- LANDR vs Studio One
- LANDR vs FL Studio
- LANDR vs GarageBand
- LANDR vs rekordbox
- LANDR vs iHeartRadio
- LANDR vs Mixcloud
- LANDR vs Pandora
- LANDR vs Renoise
- LANDR vs Tidal
- LANDR vs Sibelius
- LANDR vs Amazon Music
- LANDR vs Bandcamp
- LANDR vs Deezer
- LANDR vs YouTube Music
- LANDR vs Dorico
- LANDR vs Udio
- TuneCore vs DistroKid
- TuneCore vs Splice
- TuneCore vs CD Baby
- TuneCore vs Pro Tools
- TuneCore vs MuseScore
- TuneCore vs Soundtrap
- TuneCore vs Studio One
- TuneCore vs FL Studio
- TuneCore vs GarageBand
- TuneCore vs rekordbox
- TuneCore vs iHeartRadio
- TuneCore vs Mixcloud
- TuneCore vs Pandora
- TuneCore vs Renoise
- TuneCore vs Tidal
- TuneCore vs Sibelius
- TuneCore vs Amazon Music
- TuneCore vs Bandcamp
- TuneCore vs Deezer
- TuneCore vs YouTube Music
- TuneCore vs Dorico
- TuneCore vs Udio
