APIs · head to head
Backbase vs Yapily

Backbase
APIs
Digital and AI-native engagement banking platform for customer-facing banking experiences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yapily
APIs
Open banking API infrastructure for account data and pay-by-bank payments across Europe
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Yapily has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Backbase pricing scales with assets under management and AI API calls, meaning cost grows as the bank itself grows and adopts more AI features, which is a less predictable cost curve than a flat per-seat model.; Yapily production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Backbase covers Digital banking front end, Yapily covers Unified open banking API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backbase and Yapily actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backbase
- Digital banking front end
- Digital onboarding
- Customer engagement workflows
- AI-native banking OS positioning
- Core-agnostic integration
- Small business banking modules
Only in Yapily
- Unified open banking API
- Account information access
- Payment initiation
- Free sandbox
- Multi-country bank coverage
- Webhooks and reconciliation tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backbase
- An established bank wanting to modernise its digital customer experience without replacing its core banking systemnot Yapily
- A credit union wanting purpose-built digital onboarding and servicing workflowsnot Yapily
- A newer bank wanting an engagement layer built for AI-driven interaction from the outsetnot Yapily
- A bank consolidating several separate digital banking front ends into one platform across retail and business bankingnot Yapily
Yapily
- A merchant wanting a lower-cost payment method alongside card acceptancenot Backbase
- A lending or budgeting product needing bank account data for affordability checksnot Backbase
- A business wanting one API instead of separate integrations to each bank's own open banking standardnot Backbase
- A company prototyping open banking features for free in sandbox before committing budgetnot Backbase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backbase
- Pricing scales with assets under management and AI API calls, meaning cost grows as the bank itself grows and adopts more AI features, which is a less predictable cost curve than a flat per-seat model.
- It sits above, not instead of, a core banking system, so adopting it does not reduce a bank's overall vendor count or technology complexity; it adds a specialised layer.
- As with any customer-facing banking platform, an outage or performance issue directly affects the bank's customers, so the operational stakes of vendor reliability are high.
- Implementation for a large bank spans multiple modules and integration points, and realistic timelines run well beyond a simple software rollout.
- Pricing opacity means a bank cannot benchmark Backbase against competing engagement banking platforms without engaging each vendor's own sales process separately.
Yapily
- Production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- Consumer adoption of pay-by-bank still lags card payments, so merchants offering it as a checkout option typically see it used as a secondary rather than primary payment method.
- Coverage depends on the banks in each country maintaining reliable open banking APIs, and inconsistent bank-side reliability across markets is a known category-wide weakness, not unique to Yapily but not solved by it either.
- As infrastructure for both account data and payments, a company only needing one of those two capabilities is still evaluating a broader platform than it may need.
- Regulatory dependence on PSD2 and UK open banking rules means the underlying legal framework, not just Yapily's product, could shift and affect what is possible on the platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Backbase
On request- Backbase$undefined/year
- Pricing scales with users, modules, assets under management and AI API calls
- Custom quote required, not published
Yapily
Free- SandboxFree
- Free testing environment
- UK and European bank connections for development
- Production$undefined/month
- Pay-as-you-go pricing, exact rates not published
- Typical pay-by-bank cost of 0.1 to 0.5% or a flat 5 to 30 pence per transaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Backbase if
- You need digital banking front end.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want digital onboarding.
Choose Yapily if
- You need unified open banking api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want account information access.
Questions people ask
- Is Backbase or Yapily better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backbase starts at On request and Yapily at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backbase or Yapily?
- Yapily has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Backbase and Free for Yapily.
- Does Backbase or Yapily run on more platforms?
- Backbase runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yapily runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Yapily for free?
- Yes. Yapily has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Backbase starts at On request.
- What is Backbase best used for?
- Backbase is most often used for an established bank wanting to modernise its digital customer experience without replacing its core banking system, a credit union wanting purpose-built digital onboarding and servicing workflows, a newer bank wanting an engagement layer built for ai-driven interaction from the outset, a bank consolidating several separate digital banking front ends into one platform across retail and business banking. Of those, an established bank wanting to modernise its digital customer experience without replacing its core banking system and a credit union wanting purpose-built digital onboarding and servicing workflows are not what Yapily is typically brought in for.
- What can Backbase do that Yapily cannot?
- Backbase covers Digital banking front end, Digital onboarding, Customer engagement workflows, AI-native banking OS positioning. Yapily covers Unified open banking API, Account information access, Payment initiation, Free sandbox.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backbase: Does Backbase replace our core banking system?
No, it is a customer engagement layer that sits above and integrates with an existing core banking system.
Yapily: Is there a free way to try it?
Yes, sandbox access is free for development and testing.
Backbase: How does pricing work?
It scales with factors including number of users, modules implemented, assets under management and AI API calls; exact numbers require a quote.
Yapily: How much cheaper is pay-by-bank than card payments?
Typically 0.1 to 0.5% of transaction value, or a flat 5 to 30 pence, against 1.5 to 3.5% for card scheme fees.
Backbase: Is it suited to business as well as retail banking?
Yes, it includes modules specifically for small business banking engagement alongside retail.
Yapily: Is production pricing published?
No, production access is pay-as-you-go but exact rates require a sales conversation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backbase vs Flybits
- Backbase vs Meniga
- Backbase vs Mambu
- Backbase vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Backbase vs Bud Financial
- Backbase vs Episode Six
- Backbase vs 10x Banking
- Backbase vs Svix
- Backbase vs Synctera
- Backbase vs Tribe Payments
- Backbase vs Vodeno
- Backbase vs Ozone API
- Backbase vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Backbase vs Swagger
- Backbase vs TIBCO Mashery
- Backbase vs Zeplo
- Backbase vs Pusher
- Backbase vs Salt Edge
- Backbase vs Trustly
- Backbase vs Aiia
- Backbase vs Swan
- Backbase vs Token.io
- Backbase vs Tink
- Backbase vs Volt
- Backbase vs TrueLayer
- Backbase vs Method Financial
- Backbase vs Dwolla
- Backbase vs Brite Payments
- Backbase vs Solaris
- Backbase vs Stainless
- Backbase vs Strapi
- Backbase vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Backbase vs Thredd
- Yapily vs Flybits
- Yapily vs Meniga
- Yapily vs Mambu
- Yapily vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Yapily vs Bud Financial
- Yapily vs Episode Six
- Yapily vs 10x Banking
- Yapily vs Svix
- Yapily vs Synctera
- Yapily vs Tribe Payments
- Yapily vs Vodeno
- Yapily vs Ozone API
- Yapily vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Yapily vs Swagger
- Yapily vs TIBCO Mashery
- Yapily vs Zeplo
- Yapily vs Pusher
- Yapily vs Salt Edge
- Yapily vs Trustly
- Yapily vs Aiia
- Yapily vs Swan
- Yapily vs Token.io
- Yapily vs Tink
- Yapily vs Volt
- Yapily vs TrueLayer
- Yapily vs Method Financial
- Yapily vs Dwolla
- Yapily vs Brite Payments
- Yapily vs Solaris
- Yapily vs Stainless
- Yapily vs Strapi
- Yapily vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Yapily vs Thredd
