APIs · head to head
Toqio vs Yapily

Toqio
APIs
No code platform for building embedded finance products on your own providers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yapily
APIs
Open banking API infrastructure for account data and pay-by-bank payments across Europe
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Yapily has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Toqio toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.; Yapily production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Toqio covers No code product builder, Yapily covers Unified open banking API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Toqio and Yapily actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Toqio
- No code product builder
- Provider orchestration
- Account and card modules
- Embedded financing
- Back office tooling
- Multi entity and multi brand
- White label mobile apps
- Marketplace of providers
Only in Yapily
- Unified open banking API
- Account information access
- Payment initiation
- Free sandbox
- Multi-country bank coverage
- Webhooks and reconciliation tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Toqio
- A manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer networknot Yapily
- A B2B marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itselfnot Yapily
- A corporate that wants to switch card issuer without rebuilding its customer facing productnot Yapily
- A group launching the same embedded finance product across several markets with different local providersnot Yapily
Yapily
- A merchant wanting a lower-cost payment method alongside card acceptancenot Toqio
- A lending or budgeting product needing bank account data for affordability checksnot Toqio
- A business wanting one API instead of separate integrations to each bank's own open banking standardnot Toqio
- A company prototyping open banking features for free in sandbox before committing budgetnot Toqio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Toqio
- Toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- Because it orchestrates rather than provides, the customer experience is only as good as the underlying bank or issuer, and Toqio cannot fix a partner's settlement delays or outages.
- Pricing is quoted with no public rate card, so comparing it against building in house or against a bundled banking as a service provider requires a full sales process.
- With around EUR 30 million raised in total it is a small supplier to underpin a financial product a large corporate expects to run for a decade, which raises real continuity questions in procurement.
- No code configuration covers standard patterns well but bespoke customer journeys eventually require custom development, at which point the main advantage over building directly on provider APIs narrows.
Yapily
- Production pricing itself is not published; only the resulting typical merchant transaction cost is publicly known, so the underlying platform fee still requires a sales conversation.
- Consumer adoption of pay-by-bank still lags card payments, so merchants offering it as a checkout option typically see it used as a secondary rather than primary payment method.
- Coverage depends on the banks in each country maintaining reliable open banking APIs, and inconsistent bank-side reliability across markets is a known category-wide weakness, not unique to Yapily but not solved by it either.
- As infrastructure for both account data and payments, a company only needing one of those two capabilities is still evaluating a broader platform than it may need.
- Regulatory dependence on PSD2 and UK open banking rules means the underlying legal framework, not just Yapily's product, could shift and affect what is possible on the platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Toqio
On request- Toqio platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically setup plus recurring platform fee
- Regulated provider fees are separate and contracted by you
- Card interchange and lending economics belong to your provider agreements
Yapily
Free- SandboxFree
- Free testing environment
- UK and European bank connections for development
- Production$undefined/month
- Pay-as-you-go pricing, exact rates not published
- Typical pay-by-bank cost of 0.1 to 0.5% or a flat 5 to 30 pence per transaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Toqio if
- You need no code product builder.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want provider orchestration.
Choose Yapily if
- You need unified open banking api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want account information access.
Questions people ask
- Is Toqio or Yapily better?
- Neither clearly leads. Toqio starts at On request and Yapily at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Toqio or Yapily?
- Yapily has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Toqio and Free for Yapily.
- Does Toqio or Yapily run on more platforms?
- Toqio runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Yapily runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Yapily for free?
- Yes. Yapily has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Toqio starts at On request.
- What is Toqio best used for?
- Toqio is most often used for a manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer network, a b2b marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itself, a corporate that wants to switch card issuer without rebuilding its customer facing product, a group launching the same embedded finance product across several markets with different local providers. Of those, a manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer network and a b2b marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itself are not what Yapily is typically brought in for.
- What can Toqio do that Yapily cannot?
- Toqio covers No code product builder, Provider orchestration, Account and card modules, Embedded financing. Yapily covers Unified open banking API, Account information access, Payment initiation, Free sandbox.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Toqio: Does Toqio provide the banking licence?
No, deliberately. You contract your own bank, issuer or lender, which is why you can replace them without rebuilding the product.
Yapily: Is there a free way to try it?
Yes, sandbox access is free for development and testing.
Toqio: Who is it aimed at?
Large corporates and B2B ecosystem operators embedding finance for suppliers, dealers or marketplace sellers, not consumer fintech startups.
Yapily: How much cheaper is pay-by-bank than card payments?
Typically 0.1 to 0.5% of transaction value, or a flat 5 to 30 pence, against 1.5 to 3.5% for card scheme fees.
Toqio: How much does it cost?
Not published. Expect a setup fee plus a recurring platform fee, with all regulated provider costs on top and separately contracted.
Yapily: Is production pricing published?
No, production access is pay-as-you-go but exact rates require a sales conversation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Toqio vs Highnote
- Toqio vs Unit
- Toqio vs Solaris
- Toqio vs Thredd
- Toqio vs Swan
- Toqio vs Weavr
- Toqio vs Fintech Farm
- Toqio vs Lithic
- Toqio vs Vodeno
- Toqio vs Column
- Toqio vs Synctera
- Toqio vs Astra
- Toqio vs Marqeta
- Toqio vs Meniga
- Toqio vs Moov
- Toqio vs MX Technologies
- Toqio vs PubNub
- Toqio vs Skaleet
- Toqio vs Trustly
- Toqio vs Aiia
- Toqio vs Token.io
- Toqio vs Tink
- Toqio vs Volt
- Toqio vs TrueLayer
- Toqio vs Tribe Payments
- Toqio vs Method Financial
- Toqio vs Dwolla
- Toqio vs Brite Payments
- Toqio vs Salt Edge
- Toqio vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Toqio vs Stainless
- Toqio vs Strapi
- Toqio vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Yapily vs Highnote
- Yapily vs Unit
- Yapily vs Solaris
- Yapily vs Thredd
- Yapily vs Swan
- Yapily vs Weavr
- Yapily vs Fintech Farm
- Yapily vs Lithic
- Yapily vs Vodeno
- Yapily vs Column
- Yapily vs Synctera
- Yapily vs Astra
- Yapily vs Marqeta
- Yapily vs Meniga
- Yapily vs Moov
- Yapily vs MX Technologies
- Yapily vs PubNub
- Yapily vs Skaleet
- Yapily vs Trustly
- Yapily vs Aiia
- Yapily vs Token.io
- Yapily vs Tink
- Yapily vs Volt
- Yapily vs TrueLayer
- Yapily vs Tribe Payments
- Yapily vs Method Financial
- Yapily vs Dwolla
- Yapily vs Brite Payments
- Yapily vs Salt Edge
- Yapily vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Yapily vs Stainless
- Yapily vs Strapi
- Yapily vs Swagger/OpenAPI
