No-Code · head to head
OutSystems vs WeWeb

OutSystems
No-Code
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

WeWeb
No-Code
Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only WeWeb has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OutSystems application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.; WeWeb there is no database, authentication provider or server-side logic layer, so a WeWeb project is always at least two subscriptions and the total cost is never the price on the pricing page.
- They diverge on capability: OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, WeWeb covers Backend agnostic.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OutSystems and WeWeb actually diverge.
| Attribute | OutSystems | WeWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs | quote |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (No-Code).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OutSystems
- Visual application modelling
- Generated deployable code
- One-click deployment
- AI-assisted development
- Application Object governance
- Prebuilt integrations
Only in WeWeb
- Backend agnostic
- Vue output
- Data binding and workflows
- Custom code
- White labelling
- Staging and publishing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OutSystems
- An enterprise replacing custom .NET or Java application development with a governed low-code platform at scalenot WeWeb
- A company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal usersnot WeWeb
- An IT department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtimenot WeWeb
- An organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teamsnot WeWeb
WeWeb
- Building an interface over data that already lives in Supabase or PostgreSQLnot OutSystems
- Agency work where the client contract requires an application that runs without the vendornot OutSystems
- Replacing the front end of a no-code application that has outgrown its original platformnot OutSystems
- Internal tools for staff where the database and its permissions already exist and must not be duplicatednot OutSystems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OutSystems
- Application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.
- Internal users are sold in packs of 100 and external users in packs of 10,000, so a company just over a pack boundary in either category pays for a full additional pack rather than a handful of extra seats.
- Entry-level ODC pricing starts around 36,300 US dollars a year before any AO overage or extra user packs, which puts it out of reach for smaller teams evaluating low-code options.
- Cloud infrastructure and hosting costs are frequently separate from the platform licence, so the all-in bill is higher than the headline subscription figure suggests.
- Migrating a large application portfolio off OutSystems once built is difficult, since the generated code and platform-specific patterns are not designed for a clean export to standard frameworks.
WeWeb
- There is no database, authentication provider or server-side logic layer, so a WeWeb project is always at least two subscriptions and the total cost is never the price on the pricing page.
- Self-hosting and the more useful delivery options sit on higher tiers, so on entry plans you are hosting with WeWeb and depending on its uptime for a production application.
- The learning curve is closer to a front-end framework than to a drag and drop builder; collections, bindings and state assume you understand how data flows through an interface, which defeats non-technical buyers.
- Output is web only. There is no native mobile build, so anything that must appear in the App Store needs a wrapper or a different tool entirely.
- It is a small European vendor competing against far larger platforms, so procurement teams that assess supplier viability, support depth and long-term roadmap will need convincing before signing.
Pricing, plan by plan
OutSystems
On request- ODC Entry$undefined/year
- Entry-level Application Object allowance included
- Internal users sold in packs of 100
- External users sold in packs of 10,000
- ODC Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom AO, user pack and environment volumes
- Negotiated multi-year enterprise agreements
- Premium support and dedicated infrastructure options
WeWeb
Free- WeWeb$undefined/year
- Free tier for building and previewing before publishing
- Paid tiers add custom domains, white labelling and higher usage
- Self-hosting the generated application offered on higher tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose OutSystems if
- You need visual application modelling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want generated deployable code.
Choose WeWeb if
- You need backend agnostic.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want vue output.
Questions people ask
- Is OutSystems or WeWeb better?
- Neither clearly leads. OutSystems starts at On request and WeWeb at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OutSystems or WeWeb?
- WeWeb has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OutSystems and Free for WeWeb.
- Does OutSystems or WeWeb run on more platforms?
- OutSystems runs on Web, iOS, Android. WeWeb runs on Web.
- Can I use WeWeb for free?
- Yes. WeWeb has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OutSystems starts at On request.
- What is OutSystems best used for?
- OutSystems is most often used for an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale, a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users, an it department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtime, an organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teams. Of those, an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale and a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users are not what WeWeb is typically brought in for.
- What can OutSystems do that WeWeb cannot?
- OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Generated deployable code, One-click deployment, AI-assisted development. WeWeb covers Backend agnostic, Vue output, Data binding and workflows, Custom code.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OutSystems: What is an Application Object?
A unit OutSystems uses to measure application complexity, counting elements such as screens, database tables and exposed APIs; more AOs mean a bigger licence requirement.
WeWeb: Do I need another product to use WeWeb?
Yes. It builds the front end only. You need a backend such as Supabase, an existing database or an API before the application does anything useful.
OutSystems: Is there a free tier?
OutSystems has offered free or trial tiers historically for evaluation, but production use at any scale runs on paid ODC plans.
WeWeb: Can I host the app myself?
On the higher tiers, yes. That is one of the main reasons agencies choose it, because the delivered application can run without the vendor in the path.
OutSystems: How does external user pricing work?
External users, typically customers or partners, are sold in packs of 10,000 at roughly a hundredth of the per-seat cost of internal (employee) user packs.
WeWeb: Is it suitable for someone who cannot code?
Less so than most no-code builders. You do not have to write code, but you do have to think like a front-end developer about state, collections and bindings.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OutSystems vs Mendix
- OutSystems vs FlutterFlow
- OutSystems vs Appian
- OutSystems vs Superblocks
- OutSystems vs Caspio
- OutSystems vs Zoho Creator
- OutSystems vs Thunkable
- OutSystems vs Momen
- OutSystems vs Adalo
- OutSystems vs Bubble
- OutSystems vs Quickbase
- OutSystems vs ToolJet
- OutSystems vs Directual
- OutSystems vs Draftbit
- OutSystems vs Pabbly Connect
- OutSystems vs Stacker
- OutSystems vs Glide
- OutSystems vs Softr
- OutSystems vs Noloco
- OutSystems vs Whalesync
- WeWeb vs Mendix
- WeWeb vs FlutterFlow
- WeWeb vs Appian
- WeWeb vs Superblocks
- WeWeb vs Caspio
- WeWeb vs Zoho Creator
- WeWeb vs Thunkable
- WeWeb vs Momen
- WeWeb vs Adalo
- WeWeb vs Bubble
- WeWeb vs Quickbase
- WeWeb vs ToolJet
- WeWeb vs Directual
- WeWeb vs Draftbit
- WeWeb vs Pabbly Connect
- WeWeb vs Stacker
- WeWeb vs Glide
- WeWeb vs Softr
- WeWeb vs Noloco
- WeWeb vs Whalesync
