No-Code · head to head
OutSystems vs Softr

OutSystems
No-Code
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Softr
No-Code
No-code platform for building web apps, client portals and directories from data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Softr has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OutSystems application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.; Softr pricing scales with the number of app users, which can get expensive for consumer-facing apps.
- They diverge on capability: OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Softr covers Data source connectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OutSystems and Softr actually diverge.
| Attribute | OutSystems | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (No-Code).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OutSystems
- Visual application modelling
- Generated deployable code
- One-click deployment
- AI-assisted development
- Application Object governance
- Prebuilt integrations
Only in Softr
- Data source connectors
- Pre-built blocks
- User authentication & permissions
- Client portals
- Payments
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OutSystems
- An enterprise replacing custom .NET or Java application development with a governed low-code platform at scalenot Softr
- A company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal usersnot Softr
- An IT department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtimenot Softr
- An organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teamsnot Softr
Softr
- Client and partner portalsnot OutSystems
- Internal tools on top of Airtablenot OutSystems
- Directory and marketplace websitesnot OutSystems
- MVP prototypes for startupsnot OutSystems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OutSystems
- Application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.
- Internal users are sold in packs of 100 and external users in packs of 10,000, so a company just over a pack boundary in either category pays for a full additional pack rather than a handful of extra seats.
- Entry-level ODC pricing starts around 36,300 US dollars a year before any AO overage or extra user packs, which puts it out of reach for smaller teams evaluating low-code options.
- Cloud infrastructure and hosting costs are frequently separate from the platform licence, so the all-in bill is higher than the headline subscription figure suggests.
- Migrating a large application portfolio off OutSystems once built is difficult, since the generated code and platform-specific patterns are not designed for a clean export to standard frameworks.
Softr
- Pricing scales with the number of app users, which can get expensive for consumer-facing apps.
- Complex custom logic requires workarounds since it lacks a full scripting layer.
- Deep customization of UI beyond provided blocks is limited compared to code-based builders.
- Performance depends heavily on the connected data source, e.g. Airtable API limits.
Pricing, plan by plan
OutSystems
On request- ODC Entry$undefined/year
- Entry-level Application Object allowance included
- Internal users sold in packs of 100
- External users sold in packs of 10,000
- ODC Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom AO, user pack and environment volumes
- Negotiated multi-year enterprise agreements
- Premium support and dedicated infrastructure options
Softr
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 app builders
- 5 combined app users
- No custom domain
- Basic$25/month
- 1 app builder
- 5 Team + 5 Client users
- 1 custom domain
- Pro$119/month
- 2 app builders
- Up to 50 Team + 250 Client users
- 1 custom domain
- Business$395/month
- 3 app builders
- Up to 100 Team + 500 Client users
- 1 custom domain
Which should you pick?
Choose OutSystems if
- You need visual application modelling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want generated deployable code.
Choose Softr if
- You need data source connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want pre-built blocks.
Questions people ask
- Is OutSystems or Softr better?
- Neither clearly leads. OutSystems starts at On request and Softr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OutSystems or Softr?
- Softr has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OutSystems and Free for Softr.
- Does OutSystems or Softr run on more platforms?
- OutSystems runs on Web, iOS, Android. Softr runs on web.
- Can I use Softr for free?
- Yes. Softr has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OutSystems starts at On request.
- What is OutSystems best used for?
- OutSystems is most often used for an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale, a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users, an it department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtime, an organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teams. Of those, an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale and a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users are not what Softr is typically brought in for.
- What can OutSystems do that Softr cannot?
- OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Generated deployable code, One-click deployment, AI-assisted development. Softr covers Data source connectors, Pre-built blocks, User authentication & permissions, Client portals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OutSystems: What is an Application Object?
A unit OutSystems uses to measure application complexity, counting elements such as screens, database tables and exposed APIs; more AOs mean a bigger licence requirement.
Softr: What does Softr cost?
Softr offers Free, Basic ($25/mo), Pro ($119/mo), Business ($395/mo), and custom Enterprise plans, with annual billing giving roughly two months free.
SourceOutSystems: Is there a free tier?
OutSystems has offered free or trial tiers historically for evaluation, but production use at any scale runs on paid ODC plans.
Softr: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan allows up to 3 app builders and 5 combined app users, with no custom domain included.
SourceOutSystems: How does external user pricing work?
External users, typically customers or partners, are sold in packs of 10,000 at roughly a hundredth of the per-seat cost of internal (employee) user packs.
Softr: How is usage metered?
Softr charges based on the number of app builders and app users (Team and Client), not on the number of apps published; extra users and domains cost additional monthly fees.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OutSystems vs Mendix
- OutSystems vs FlutterFlow
- OutSystems vs Appian
- OutSystems vs Superblocks
- OutSystems vs Caspio
- OutSystems vs Zoho Creator
- OutSystems vs Thunkable
- OutSystems vs Momen
- OutSystems vs Adalo
- OutSystems vs Bubble
- OutSystems vs Quickbase
- OutSystems vs ToolJet
- OutSystems vs Directual
- OutSystems vs Draftbit
- OutSystems vs Pabbly Connect
- OutSystems vs Stacker
- OutSystems vs Noloco
- OutSystems vs Glide
- OutSystems vs WeWeb
- OutSystems vs Appsmith
- OutSystems vs Whalesync
- OutSystems vs AppSheet
- OutSystems vs Corteza
- Softr vs Mendix
- Softr vs FlutterFlow
- Softr vs Appian
- Softr vs Superblocks
- Softr vs Caspio
- Softr vs Zoho Creator
- Softr vs Thunkable
- Softr vs Momen
- Softr vs Adalo
- Softr vs Bubble
- Softr vs Quickbase
- Softr vs ToolJet
- Softr vs Directual
- Softr vs Draftbit
- Softr vs Pabbly Connect
- Softr vs Stacker
- Softr vs Noloco
- Softr vs Glide
- Softr vs WeWeb
- Softr vs Appsmith
- Softr vs Whalesync
- Softr vs AppSheet
- Softr vs Corteza
