Mining · head to head
FLAC3D vs UDEC
FLAC3D
Mining
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
UDEC
Mining
Universal distinct element code for mining analysis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store; UDEC the UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, UDEC covers Distinct element modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FLAC3D and UDEC actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows, Linux), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining), founded (1981).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- Python scripting
Only in UDEC
- Distinct element modeling
- Joint network modeling
- Block interaction analysis
- Support interaction
- FLAC3D
- 3DEC
Both cover
- Dynamic analysis
- AutoCAD
- Leapfrog
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot UDEC
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot UDEC
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot UDEC
UDEC
- Geotechnical engineering simulationsnot FLAC3D
- Discrete element modeling and analysisnot FLAC3D
- Mining and tunneling software analysisnot FLAC3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
UDEC
- The UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Fluid Flow, Barton-Bandis joint analysis, Creep, Thermal and User Defined Models are optional add ons charged on top of the base licence
- Writing custom constitutive models requires the separately licensed UDM option and C++ programming
- Purchases through the Buy Now route are prepaid annual subscriptions rather than a permanent licence
Pricing, plan by plan
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
UDEC
On request- UDEC Professional$19000/year
- Distinct element analysis
- Joint modeling
- Block interaction
Which should you pick?
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Choose UDEC if
- You need distinct element modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want joint network modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is FLAC3D or UDEC better?
- Neither clearly leads. FLAC3D starts at On request and UDEC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FLAC3D or UDEC?
- FLAC3D starts at On request and UDEC at On request.
- Does FLAC3D or UDEC run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, Linux, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is FLAC3D best used for?
- FLAC3D is most often used for three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour, analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving, coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structures. Of those, three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour and analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving are not what UDEC is typically brought in for.
- What can FLAC3D do that UDEC cannot?
- FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Coupled flow analysis, Mining-specific features. UDEC covers Distinct element modeling, Joint network modeling, Block interaction analysis, Support interaction. Both handle Dynamic analysis, AutoCAD, Leapfrog, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FLAC3D: What licensing models does FLAC3D offer?
FLAC3D offers perpetual licenses (one-time purchase) and subscription licenses (recurring payments). Web-based license management allows central organizational control.
SourceUDEC: How much does UDEC cost?
UDEC pricing is not published on the product page. The vendor directs inquiries through an 'Ask an Expert' contact option at [email protected] or a 'Request a Quote' option through the itascasoftware.com store.
SourceFLAC3D: Can I run multiple instances of FLAC3D with one license?
Yes. FLAC3D licenses allow two instances to run simultaneously on the same computer.
SourceUDEC: What is UDEC's pricing model?
UDEC is available through a subscription model rather than one-time licensing. Prepaid annual subscriptions are available through the software store, and pricing is customized based on quote requests.
SourceFLAC3D: How do I get a free trial or demo of FLAC3D?
FLAC3D offers a free software demo download. Visitors can request the demo through the product page or contact the company directly.
SourceFLAC3D: What is the pricing for FLAC3D?
Specific pricing is not listed on the product page. Users must request a quote through the 'REQUEST A QUOTE' button or purchase through the FastSpring payment processor.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs GeoStudio
- FLAC3D vs PLAXIS
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- FLAC3D vs Geoscience ANALYST
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs OptiMine
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs RS2
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs GEOVIA GEMS
- FLAC3D vs IHS Markit Petra
- FLAC3D vs Snowden Supervisor
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- FLAC3D vs Wenco
- FLAC3D vs Seequent Central
- FLAC3D vs Whittle
- UDEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- UDEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- UDEC vs Deswik Suite
- UDEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- UDEC vs GeoStudio
- UDEC vs PLAXIS
- UDEC vs Maptek I-Site
- UDEC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- UDEC vs Geoscience ANALYST
- UDEC vs Datamine
- UDEC vs Minemax
- UDEC vs OptiMine
- UDEC vs Promine
- UDEC vs Surpac
- UDEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- UDEC vs RS2
- UDEC vs Vulcan
- UDEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- UDEC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- UDEC vs IHS Markit Petra
- UDEC vs Snowden Supervisor
- UDEC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- UDEC vs Wenco
- UDEC vs Seequent Central
- UDEC vs Whittle
