APIs · head to head
Tyk vs VerneMQ

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tyk professional and Enterprise plan pricing not published; contact required; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: Tyk covers API Gateway, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tyk and VerneMQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tyk
- API Gateway
- Rate Limiting
- Authentication
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- AWS
- Azure
- Linux support
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tyk
- API gateway and API management platformsnot VerneMQ
- Microservices architecture orchestrationnot VerneMQ
- High-growth teams standardizing on API platformsnot VerneMQ
- Enterprises requiring advanced security and governancenot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Tyk
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Tyk
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Tyk
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Tyk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tyk
- Professional and Enterprise plan pricing not published; contact required
- Core plan uses consumption-based model with variable costs
- No upfront pricing transparency for production deployments
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Tyk
Free- Free TrialFree
- Fully featured 48-hour trial
- No credit card required
- Tyk Cloud access
- Core Plan$null/month
- Usage-based flexible pricing
- Cloud, Hybrid, or Self-managed deployment
- Unlimited API gateways
- Professional Plan$null/month
- One fixed price with unlimited access
- All deployment options
- Unlimited APIs and requests
- Enterprise Plan$null/month
- Custom pricing required
- Advanced governance and security
- Premium support with custom SLAs
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Tyk if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want rate limiting.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is Tyk or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tyk starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tyk or VerneMQ?
- Tyk starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does Tyk or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- Tyk runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Tyk for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Tyk best used for?
- Tyk is most often used for api gateway and api management platforms, microservices architecture orchestration, high-growth teams standardizing on api platforms, enterprises requiring advanced security and governance. Of those, api gateway and api management platforms and microservices architecture orchestration are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Tyk do that VerneMQ cannot?
- Tyk covers API Gateway, Rate Limiting, Authentication, Kubernetes. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tyk: How much does Tyk cost?
Tyk offers a free 48-hour trial with no credit card required. The Core plan uses usage-based pricing on a flexible model. Professional plan offers unlimited access at a fixed price (amount not published). Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
Tyk: Is there a free trial of Tyk?
Yes, Tyk provides a fully featured 48-hour free trial of Tyk Cloud that requires no credit card to start.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
Tyk: What deployment options are included in Tyk pricing?
All Tyk plans support Cloud, Hybrid, or Self-managed deployment options without feature restrictions, allowing flexible infrastructure choices across pricing tiers.
SourceVerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
VerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tyk vs Kong Gateway
- Tyk vs Appwrite
- Tyk vs PocketBase
- Tyk vs Hasura
- Tyk vs Sanity
- Tyk vs Convoy
- Tyk vs Gravitee
- Tyk vs Janus Gateway
- Tyk vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Tyk vs Bruno
- Tyk vs Directus
- Tyk vs Svix
- Tyk vs Synctera
- Tyk vs Treblle
- Tyk vs Tribe Payments
- Tyk vs Trustly
- Tyk vs Tuum
- Tyk vs Kong
- Tyk vs EMQX
- Tyk vs RabbitMQ
- Tyk vs NATS
- Tyk vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Tyk vs Canary Labs
- Tyk vs Solace PubSub+
- Tyk vs TimescaleDB
- Tyk vs Apache Pulsar
- Tyk vs Presto
- Tyk vs StarRocks
- Tyk vs Timeplus
- Tyk vs PostgreSQL
- Tyk vs Chroma
- Tyk vs Cloudinary
- Tyk vs Convex
- Tyk vs Dgraph
- Tyk vs Dragonfly
- Tyk vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs Kong Gateway
- VerneMQ vs Appwrite
- VerneMQ vs PocketBase
- VerneMQ vs Hasura
- VerneMQ vs Sanity
- VerneMQ vs Convoy
- VerneMQ vs Gravitee
- VerneMQ vs Janus Gateway
- VerneMQ vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- VerneMQ vs Bruno
- VerneMQ vs Directus
- VerneMQ vs Svix
- VerneMQ vs Synctera
- VerneMQ vs Treblle
- VerneMQ vs Tribe Payments
- VerneMQ vs Trustly
- VerneMQ vs Tuum
- VerneMQ vs Kong
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio

