Databases · head to head
Timeplus vs Windmill

Timeplus
Databases
Streaming SQL engine built on ClickHouse internals, shipping as one small binary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Timeplus proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: Timeplus covers Streaming SQL, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Timeplus and Windmill actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Timeplus
- Streaming SQL
- Unified streaming and historical
- ClickHouse-based engine
- Single binary deployment
- External streams
- Materialised views
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Timeplus
- Real-time alerting on Kafka topics where standing up a Flink cluster is more work than the use case justifiesnot Windmill
- Fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one querynot Windmill
- Streaming ETL from Kafka or MySQL change data capture into ClickHouse without writing Javanot Windmill
- A small data team that needs continuous aggregation but has no platform engineers to operate JVM infrastructurenot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Timeplus
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Timeplus
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Timeplus
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Timeplus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Timeplus
- Proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- It is a young project against Apache Flink’s decade of production history, so the hiring pool, the connector library and the body of known failure modes are all much smaller.
- Inheriting ClickHouse internals also inherits ClickHouse constraints: memory-hungry queries, awkward updates and a SQL dialect that is not portable to other engines.
- Exactly-once semantics and state recovery guarantees are less battle-tested than Flink checkpointing, which matters if the pipeline moves money.
- Cloud pricing is by provisioned instance size rather than usage, so a bursty workload pays for peak capacity around the clock or has to be resized by hand.
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Timeplus
Free- Timeplus ProtonFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Single node only
- Full streaming SQL engine
- Timeplus Cloud$199/month
- One to thirty-two CPUs
- 4 GB to 128 GB memory
- From 250 GB SSD storage
- Self-hosted or BYOC$undefined/year
- Multi-node clustering
- Kubernetes or bare metal
- Customisable compute and storage
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Timeplus if
- You need streaming sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want unified streaming and historical.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Timeplus or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Timeplus starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Timeplus or Windmill?
- Timeplus starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does Timeplus or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Timeplus runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Timeplus for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Timeplus best used for?
- Timeplus is most often used for real-time alerting on kafka topics where standing up a flink cluster is more work than the use case justifies, fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one query, streaming etl from kafka or mysql change data capture into clickhouse without writing java, a small data team that needs continuous aggregation but has no platform engineers to operate jvm infrastructure. Of those, real-time alerting on kafka topics where standing up a flink cluster is more work than the use case justifies and fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one query are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Timeplus do that Windmill cannot?
- Timeplus covers Streaming SQL, Unified streaming and historical, ClickHouse-based engine, Single binary deployment. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Timeplus: Is Timeplus open source?
The core engine, Timeplus Proton, is Apache 2.0. Timeplus Enterprise and Cloud are commercial.
Windmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceTimeplus: What is the difference from Flink?
Timeplus is one binary with SQL as the only interface; Flink is a JVM cluster with a Java and SQL API and far more operational surface.
Windmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceTimeplus: Can Proton run in production?
It can, but it is single-node only, so there is no high availability without the commercial edition.
Windmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceTimeplus: How much is the cloud?
From 199 US dollars a month, sized by CPU and memory, with a fourteen day trial.
Windmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Timeplus vs Apache Flink
- Timeplus vs ClickHouse
- Timeplus vs Materialize
- Timeplus vs Redpanda
- Timeplus vs NATS
- Timeplus vs DuckDB
- Timeplus vs Estuary
- Timeplus vs RisingWave
- Timeplus vs Meilisearch
- Timeplus vs Neo4j
- Timeplus vs OpenSearch
- Timeplus vs Qdrant
- Timeplus vs SingleStore
- Timeplus vs TiDB
- Timeplus vs Tinybird
- Timeplus vs Apache Kafka
- Timeplus vs Apache Pulsar
- Timeplus vs Apache Druid
- Timeplus vs n8n
- Timeplus vs Nango
- Timeplus vs Airbyte
- Timeplus vs Flowable
- Timeplus vs Meltano
- Timeplus vs RudderStack
- Timeplus vs Grouparoo
- Timeplus vs Activiti
- Timeplus vs jBPM
- Timeplus vs Merge
- Timeplus vs Camunda
- Timeplus vs Flowise
- Timeplus vs Automate.io
- Timeplus vs Autonoly
- Timeplus vs Boomi
- Timeplus vs Browser Use
- Timeplus vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs Apache Flink
- Windmill vs ClickHouse
- Windmill vs Materialize
- Windmill vs Redpanda
- Windmill vs NATS
- Windmill vs DuckDB
- Windmill vs Estuary
- Windmill vs RisingWave
- Windmill vs Meilisearch
- Windmill vs Neo4j
- Windmill vs OpenSearch
- Windmill vs Qdrant
- Windmill vs SingleStore
- Windmill vs TiDB
- Windmill vs Tinybird
- Windmill vs Apache Kafka
- Windmill vs Apache Pulsar
- Windmill vs Apache Druid
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
