Cloud · head to head
Thanos vs UrBackup

Thanos
Cloud
Highly available Prometheus with long-term object storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Thanos several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Thanos covers Global query, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Thanos and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Thanos
- Global query
- Object storage retention
- Deduplication
- Downsampling
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Thanos
- Querying metrics across many clusters or regions from one placenot UrBackup
- Retaining metrics for years without local disk growthnot UrBackup
- Removing the gap that appears when a single Prometheus instance restartsnot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Thanos
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Thanos
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Thanos
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Thanos
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Thanos
- Several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes
- The compactor is a common source of operational trouble and must not run twice against the same bucket
- Query latency over object storage is meaningfully higher than local Prometheus
- Object storage costs and API request charges become real at high volume
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Thanos
Free- ThanosFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Thanos if
- You need global query.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker.
- You also want object storage retention.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Thanos or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Thanos starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Thanos or UrBackup?
- Thanos starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Thanos or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Thanos runs on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Thanos for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Thanos best used for?
- Thanos is most often used for querying metrics across many clusters or regions from one place, retaining metrics for years without local disk growth, removing the gap that appears when a single prometheus instance restarts. Of those, querying metrics across many clusters or regions from one place and retaining metrics for years without local disk growth are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Thanos do that UrBackup cannot?
- Thanos covers Global query, Object storage retention, Deduplication, Downsampling. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Thanos: Is Thanos free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-incubating. Costs are the object storage it uses.
UrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Thanos: Does Thanos replace Prometheus?
No. It runs alongside existing Prometheus servers, adding global query, deduplication and long-term storage.
UrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
Thanos: Thanos or VictoriaMetrics?
Thanos layers onto Prometheus using object storage and is the more established multi-cluster answer. VictoriaMetrics is a separate store aiming at lower resource use and fewer moving parts.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Thanos vs VictoriaMetrics
- Thanos vs Grafana Cloud
- Thanos vs Zipkin
- Thanos vs Proxmox VE
- Thanos vs Vultr
- Thanos vs Koyeb
- Thanos vs Scaleway
- Thanos vs Tencent Cloud
- Thanos vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Thanos vs Neon
- Thanos vs Pulumi
- Thanos vs Portworx
- Thanos vs K3s
- Thanos vs Upstash
- Thanos vs Azure Functions
- Thanos vs Deno Deploy
- Thanos vs Rancher
- Thanos vs Bacula
- Thanos vs Velero
- Thanos vs Kopia
- Thanos vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Thanos vs Clonezilla
- Thanos vs Amanda Enterprise
- Thanos vs rustic
- Thanos vs BDRShield
- Thanos vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Thanos vs Borg Backup
- Thanos vs Restic
- Thanos vs Clumio
- Thanos vs Cohesity
- Thanos vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Thanos vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs VictoriaMetrics
- UrBackup vs Grafana Cloud
- UrBackup vs Zipkin
- UrBackup vs Proxmox VE
- UrBackup vs Vultr
- UrBackup vs Koyeb
- UrBackup vs Scaleway
- UrBackup vs Tencent Cloud
- UrBackup vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- UrBackup vs Neon
- UrBackup vs Pulumi
- UrBackup vs Portworx
- UrBackup vs K3s
- UrBackup vs Upstash
- UrBackup vs Azure Functions
- UrBackup vs Deno Deploy
- UrBackup vs Rancher
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise
