Agriculture · head to head
Gallagher eShepherd vs Teralytic

Gallagher eShepherd
Agriculture
Virtual fencing where you own the solar collars outright and pay only a small monthly connectivity fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Gallagher eShepherd gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gallagher eShepherd and Teralytic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Gallagher eShepherd | Teralytic |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gallagher eShepherd
- Map-drawn virtual paddocks
- Audio cue then pulse
- Solar neckband
- Cellular or LoRa connectivity
- Animal location tracking
- Grazing rotation management
- Exclusion zones
- Behaviour alerts
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gallagher eShepherd
- A ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wirenot Teralytic
- A grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fencenot Teralytic
- An operation on leased ground where permanent fencing is not permitted or not recoverablenot Teralytic
- A farm short of labour that needs paddock moves done from a phone rather than a quad bikenot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot Gallagher eShepherd
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot Gallagher eShepherd
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot Gallagher eShepherd
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot Gallagher eShepherd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gallagher eShepherd
- Gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.
- A minimum of about 20 animals is needed to train a mob, which rules out smallholders and makes the system awkward for operations that run many small separate groups.
- It is cattle only: sheep, goats and deer are not supported, so a mixed grazing enterprise still needs conventional fencing for everything else.
- The connectivity fee is per active neckband and continues indefinitely, so the collars are yours but the system stops fencing if you stop paying, which is the same dependency as a subscription with a different label.
- Virtual fencing is regulated inconsistently: some jurisdictions restrict or have not yet ruled on aversive-stimulus containment, and welfare-scheme or organic certifier acceptance varies, so eligibility should be checked locally before ordering.
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
Gallagher eShepherd
On request- eShepherd neckband$undefined/year
- Neckbands purchased outright, not leased per head
- Small fixed monthly connectivity fee per active neckband
- Fees charged only on active bands
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose Gallagher eShepherd if
- You need map-drawn virtual paddocks.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want audio cue then pulse.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is Gallagher eShepherd or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gallagher eShepherd starts at On request and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gallagher eShepherd or Teralytic?
- Gallagher eShepherd starts at On request and Teralytic at On request.
- Does Gallagher eShepherd or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Gallagher eShepherd best used for?
- Gallagher eShepherd is most often used for a ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wire, a grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fence, an operation on leased ground where permanent fencing is not permitted or not recoverable, a farm short of labour that needs paddock moves done from a phone rather than a quad bike. Of those, a ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wire and a grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fence are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can Gallagher eShepherd do that Teralytic cannot?
- Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks, Audio cue then pulse, Solar neckband, Cellular or LoRa connectivity. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I lease the collars or own them?
You buy them outright. The ongoing cost is a small monthly connectivity fee per active neckband, not a per-head lease.
Teralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I need base stations?
Not with the cellular version, which uses existing mobile networks. The LoRa version needs small on-property base stations and suits areas with poor coverage.
Teralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
Gallagher eShepherd: How many cattle do I need?
At least 20 to train a mob, after which groups can be split into smaller mobs as long as each contains leaders and followers.
Teralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
Gallagher eShepherd: Does it work for sheep?
No. eShepherd is a cattle system.
Teralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
More on Gallagher eShepherd
Other head to heads
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWebb
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Farmbrite
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nofence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Halter
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CattleMax
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Herdwatch
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Gallagher eShepherd vs GEA DairyNet
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Datamars Livestock
- Gallagher eShepherd vs fieldmargin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Lely Horizon
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWater
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Agronomic
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Bushel Farm
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CeresAI
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Cropin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CropX
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Arable
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Gallagher eShepherd vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Soil Scout
- Gallagher eShepherd vs John Deere Operations Center
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Cropio
- Gallagher eShepherd vs FarmLogs
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Ag Leader
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Tend
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Traction
- Gallagher eShepherd vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs AgriWebb
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Farmbrite
- Teralytic vs Nofence
- Teralytic vs Halter
- Teralytic vs CattleMax
- Teralytic vs Herdwatch
- Teralytic vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Teralytic vs GEA DairyNet
- Teralytic vs Datamars Livestock
- Teralytic vs fieldmargin
- Teralytic vs Lely Horizon
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Agronomic
- Teralytic vs Bushel Farm
- Teralytic vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs Cropin
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Connecterra
