Agriculture · head to head
AgriWebb vs Teralytic

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only AgriWebb has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: AgriWebb priced per head of livestock, so the bill scales with the herd rather than with the features used; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: AgriWebb covers Animal inventory management, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AgriWebb and Teralytic actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AgriWebb
- Animal inventory management
- Mob & paddock management
- Grazing rotation planning
- Treatment & health records
- Weight & performance tracking
- Compliance reporting
- Financial analysis
- Offline mobile access
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AgriWebb
- Livestock records and mob management for grazing operationsnot Teralytic
- Audit-ready compliance records on the Compliance tiernot Teralytic
- Paddock and grazing rotation planningnot Teralytic
- Weight gain and performance trackingnot Teralytic
- Recording treatments and chemical applications in the fieldnot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot AgriWebb
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot AgriWebb
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot AgriWebb
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot AgriWebb
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AgriWebb
- Priced per head of livestock, so the bill scales with the herd rather than with the features used
- Available in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and South Africa only
- Movement planning and grazing planning are $300 a year each on top of the subscription
- The Cibo Labs PastureKey add-on starts at $1,000 a year
- Payments already made are non-refundable on cancellation
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
AgriWebb
Free- FreeFree
- Basic animal records
- Movement tracking
- Simple reporting
- Core$79/month
- Unlimited animals
- Mob management
- Grazing management
- Pro$149/month
- Everything in Core
- Advanced analytics
- Financial tracking
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Everything in Pro
- Multi-property management
- Custom integrations
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose AgriWebb if
- You need animal inventory management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want mob & paddock management.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is AgriWebb or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. AgriWebb starts at Free and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AgriWebb or Teralytic?
- AgriWebb has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for AgriWebb and On request for Teralytic.
- Does AgriWebb or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- AgriWebb runs on Web, Ios, Android. Teralytic runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use AgriWebb for free?
- Yes. AgriWebb has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Teralytic starts at On request.
- What is AgriWebb best used for?
- AgriWebb is most often used for livestock records and mob management for grazing operations, audit-ready compliance records on the compliance tier, paddock and grazing rotation planning, weight gain and performance tracking. Of those, livestock records and mob management for grazing operations and audit-ready compliance records on the compliance tier are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can AgriWebb do that Teralytic cannot?
- AgriWebb covers Animal inventory management, Mob & paddock management, Grazing rotation planning, Treatment & health records. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AgriWebb: How does AgriWebb pricing work?
AgriWebb uses variable pricing based on livestock numbers managed (cattle and sheep head count). Pricing is calculated per animal, offering monthly and yearly payment options with discounts for annual billing. No long-term contracts are required.
SourceTeralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
AgriWebb: What are AgriWebb's three subscription tiers?
Essentials includes interactive farm map and basic records. Compliance (marked Most Popular) adds audit compliance, biosecurity tools, treatment records, and NLIS integration. Performance adds weight projections, grazing management, breeding records, financial reporting, and stocking rate analysis.
SourceTeralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
AgriWebb: What add-ons does AgriWebb offer?
Movement Planning costs $300/year on Essentials. Grazing Planning costs $300/year on Performance. Cibo Labs PastureKey starts at $1,000/year on Performance. Pricing is variable based on livestock count across all tiers and add-ons.
SourceTeralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
Teralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- AgriWebb vs Farmbrite
- AgriWebb vs Gallagher eShepherd
- AgriWebb vs Granular
- AgriWebb vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- AgriWebb vs Nedap Livestock Management
- AgriWebb vs Lely Horizon
- AgriWebb vs CropX
- AgriWebb vs AgriSync
- AgriWebb vs Bushel
- AgriWebb vs Connecterra
- AgriWebb vs Herdwatch
- AgriWebb vs CropTracker Pro
- AgriWebb vs Ag-Analytics
- AgriWebb vs Ag Leader
- AgriWebb vs AgCode
- AgriWebb vs AgriWater
- AgriWebb vs Agronomic
- AgriWebb vs Bushel Farm
- AgriWebb vs Arable
- AgriWebb vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- AgriWebb vs METER Group ZENTRA
- AgriWebb vs Soil Scout
- AgriWebb vs John Deere Operations Center
- AgriWebb vs CeresAI
- AgriWebb vs Lindsay FieldNET
- AgriWebb vs Cropio
- AgriWebb vs FarmLogs
- AgriWebb vs Reinke ReinCloud
- AgriWebb vs Tend
- AgriWebb vs Traction
- AgriWebb vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Farmbrite
- Teralytic vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Teralytic vs Granular
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Teralytic vs Lely Horizon
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs AgriSync
- Teralytic vs Bushel
- Teralytic vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs Herdwatch
- Teralytic vs CropTracker Pro
- Teralytic vs Ag-Analytics
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs AgCode
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Agronomic
- Teralytic vs Bushel Farm
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming

