Agriculture · head to head
Gallagher eShepherd vs Tend

Gallagher eShepherd
Agriculture
Virtual fencing where you own the solar collars outright and pay only a small monthly connectivity fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tend
Agriculture
Crop planning and record keeping for small diversified market farms, priced in flat tiers rather than by acre
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tend has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Gallagher eShepherd gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.; Tend the free tier keeps only three years of history and 500 MB of storage, so a grower who stays on it loses the multi-season comparison that makes crop planning software worth having in the first place.
- They diverge on capability: Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks, Tend covers Visual crop planning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gallagher eShepherd and Tend actually diverge.
| Attribute | Gallagher eShepherd | Tend |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month by user count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gallagher eShepherd
- Map-drawn virtual paddocks
- Audio cue then pulse
- Solar neckband
- Cellular or LoRa connectivity
- Animal location tracking
- Grazing rotation management
- Exclusion zones
- Behaviour alerts
Only in Tend
- Visual crop planning
- Growing templates
- Crop library
- Task management
- Harvest and inventory tracking
- CSA and sales storefront
- Financial reporting
- AI credits
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gallagher eShepherd
- A ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wirenot Tend
- A grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fencenot Tend
- An operation on leased ground where permanent fencing is not permitted or not recoverablenot Tend
- A farm short of labour that needs paddock moves done from a phone rather than a quad bikenot Tend
Tend
- A three-acre market garden running weekly lettuce successions that needs the seeding calendar to generate itself from the harvest targetnot Gallagher eShepherd
- A cut-flower farm planning bed space against wedding orders months aheadnot Gallagher eShepherd
- A CSA operation managing 150 member shares alongside the planting plan that has to fill themnot Gallagher eShepherd
- A two-person farm replacing a spreadsheet and a whiteboard without paying a per-acre platform's minimumnot Gallagher eShepherd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gallagher eShepherd
- Gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.
- A minimum of about 20 animals is needed to train a mob, which rules out smallholders and makes the system awkward for operations that run many small separate groups.
- It is cattle only: sheep, goats and deer are not supported, so a mixed grazing enterprise still needs conventional fencing for everything else.
- The connectivity fee is per active neckband and continues indefinitely, so the collars are yours but the system stops fencing if you stop paying, which is the same dependency as a subscription with a different label.
- Virtual fencing is regulated inconsistently: some jurisdictions restrict or have not yet ruled on aversive-stimulus containment, and welfare-scheme or organic certifier acceptance varies, so eligibility should be checked locally before ordering.
Tend
- The free tier keeps only three years of history and 500 MB of storage, so a grower who stays on it loses the multi-season comparison that makes crop planning software worth having in the first place.
- Data retention is a paid feature at every level below Ultimate, which is an unusual thing to meter: a farm that downgrades from Pro to Free after a bad year risks losing records it may need for organic certification audits.
- There is no machinery, telematics, soil sampling or variable-rate capability at all, so any operation that adds broadacre ground has to run a second platform rather than extend this one.
- AI features are metered in credits rather than included, and the allowances are small at the lower tiers, so the assistant becomes something you ration rather than rely on.
- The company is small and privately held with a narrow customer base, which means integrations outside payments and basic accounting are thin and a request for a connector to a regional distributor or certifier is unlikely to be built.
Pricing, plan by plan
Gallagher eShepherd
On request- eShepherd neckband$undefined/year
- Neckbands purchased outright, not leased per head
- Small fixed monthly connectivity fee per active neckband
- Fees charged only on active bands
Tend
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 25 AI credits per month
- 3 years data retention
- Pro$30/month
- 5 users
- 500 AI credits per month
- 7 years data retention
- Ultimate$75/month
- Unlimited users
- 2,500 AI credits per month
- Unlimited data retention
- Enterprise$400/month
- Unlimited users
- 10,000+ AI credits per month
- 250 GB storage and up
Which should you pick?
Choose Gallagher eShepherd if
- You need map-drawn virtual paddocks.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want audio cue then pulse.
Choose Tend if
- You need visual crop planning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want growing templates.
Questions people ask
- Is Gallagher eShepherd or Tend better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gallagher eShepherd starts at On request and Tend at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gallagher eShepherd or Tend?
- Tend has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Gallagher eShepherd and Free for Tend.
- Does Gallagher eShepherd or Tend run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Tend for free?
- Yes. Tend has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Gallagher eShepherd starts at On request.
- What is Gallagher eShepherd best used for?
- Gallagher eShepherd is most often used for a ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wire, a grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fence, an operation on leased ground where permanent fencing is not permitted or not recoverable, a farm short of labour that needs paddock moves done from a phone rather than a quad bike. Of those, a ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wire and a grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fence are not what Tend is typically brought in for.
- What can Gallagher eShepherd do that Tend cannot?
- Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks, Audio cue then pulse, Solar neckband, Cellular or LoRa connectivity. Tend covers Visual crop planning, Growing templates, Crop library, Task management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I lease the collars or own them?
You buy them outright. The ongoing cost is a small monthly connectivity fee per active neckband, not a per-head lease.
Tend: Does Tend charge by the acre?
No. Pricing is flat by user count, and there are no acreage or crop limits on any tier including the free one. That is the main reason small growers pick it over broadacre platforms.
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I need base stations?
Not with the cellular version, which uses existing mobile networks. The LoRa version needs small on-property base stations and suits areas with poor coverage.
Tend: Can Tend handle a CSA?
Yes, including member share management and a farm-stand storefront, though payment processing runs through a third party.
Gallagher eShepherd: How many cattle do I need?
At least 20 to train a mob, after which groups can be split into smaller mobs as long as each contains leaders and followers.
Tend: Is it suitable for a 500 acre grain farm?
No. There is no machinery data, no prescription writing and no as-applied reporting. It is built for high-crop-count, low-acreage operations.
Gallagher eShepherd: Does it work for sheep?
No. eShepherd is a cattle system.
Tend: What happens to my records if I cancel?
Export before you cancel. Retention limits apply per tier, and the free tier keeps three years, so downgrading is not a safe archive strategy.
Related pages
More on Gallagher eShepherd
Other head to heads
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWebb
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Farmbrite
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nofence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Halter
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CattleMax
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Herdwatch
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Gallagher eShepherd vs GEA DairyNet
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Datamars Livestock
- Gallagher eShepherd vs fieldmargin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Lely Horizon
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWater
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Agronomic
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Bushel Farm
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CeresAI
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Cropin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Agrivi
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CropTracker Pro
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Agworld
- Gallagher eShepherd vs John Deere Operations Center
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Conservis
- Gallagher eShepherd vs FarmERP
- Gallagher eShepherd vs 365FarmNet
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Granular
- Gallagher eShepherd vs OneSoil
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Pix4Dfields
- Gallagher eShepherd vs PrecisionHawk
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Proagrica
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Produce Pro
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Raven Slingshot
- Tend vs AgriWebb
- Tend vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Tend vs Farmbrite
- Tend vs Nofence
- Tend vs Halter
- Tend vs CattleMax
- Tend vs Herdwatch
- Tend vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Tend vs GEA DairyNet
- Tend vs Datamars Livestock
- Tend vs fieldmargin
- Tend vs Lely Horizon
- Tend vs AgriWater
- Tend vs Agronomic
- Tend vs Bushel Farm
- Tend vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Tend vs CeresAI
- Tend vs Cropin
- Tend vs Agrivi
- Tend vs CropTracker Pro
- Tend vs Agworld
- Tend vs John Deere Operations Center
- Tend vs Conservis
- Tend vs FarmERP
- Tend vs 365FarmNet
- Tend vs Granular
- Tend vs OneSoil
- Tend vs Pix4Dfields
- Tend vs PrecisionHawk
- Tend vs Proagrica
- Tend vs Produce Pro
- Tend vs Raven Slingshot
