Softwr

Translation · head to head

Smartling vs Systran

Smartling logo

Smartling

Translation

Enterprise translation management sold alongside first-party language services priced per word

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Systran logo

Systran

Translation

Enterprise and on-premises machine translation, sold on per-user monthly plans and separate quoted API and installed-server products

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Smartling translation memory is retained for only 180 days on the Core tier, so the asset that would make a future migration cheap expires on the plan most likely to be used by a team testing the water.; Systran per-seat web pricing at $25.99 to $49.99 a user per month is far more expensive than the raw per-character cost of Google, Microsoft or Amazon’s APIs for high-volume, low-touch use cases.
  • They diverge on capability: Smartling covers Translation memory, Systran covers Systran Translate Pro.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Smartling and Systran actually diverge.

Attributes where Smartling and Systran differ
AttributeSmartlingSystran
Pricing modelquotePer user per month, or quote for Enterprise
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Windows, Linux

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Translation).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Smartling

  • Translation memory
  • Visual context CAT editor
  • Configurable workflows
  • First-party language services
  • Linguistic quality assurance
  • Connectors and API

Only in Systran

  • Systran Translate Pro
  • Systran Enterprise
  • Systran.io
  • CAT tool and TMS connectors
  • Custom model training
  • File translation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Smartling

  • A company that wants one supplier answerable for both the translation platform and the quality of the translated outputnot Systran
  • Marketing sites where a translator needs to see the rendered page, not a spreadsheet of strings, to get tone and length rightnot Systran
  • Replacing a platform vendor plus several separate agencies with a single contract and a single invoicenot Systran
  • Content operations at a volume where per-word rates are the dominant cost and the tooling fee is noisenot Systran

Systran

  • A government or defence agency needing machine translation that never leaves its own network, which rules out cloud-only APIsnot Smartling
  • A legal or financial services firm with confidentiality requirements that installs Systran Enterprise on-premisesnot Smartling
  • A localisation team wanting native CAT tool and TMS connectors rather than building raw API integration themselvesnot Smartling
  • A small team of translators using Translate Pro’s per-seat web plans for interactive, human-facing translation work rather than bulk automated contentnot Smartling

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Smartling

  • Translation memory is retained for only 180 days on the Core tier, so the asset that would make a future migration cheap expires on the plan most likely to be used by a team testing the water.
  • The platform subscription is not published while the per-word service rates are, so you can model the variable cost precisely and cannot model the fixed cost at all until you have been through a sales sizing exercise.
  • The vendor earns on words routed through it, so the commercial relationship rewards volume flowing to Smartling rather than volume being avoided through better reuse of existing memory.
  • Per-word pricing multiplies by target language, so adding a market to a product that ships in twelve languages costs a thirteenth of the current translation bill rather than a marginal amount.
  • Minimum contract term, minimum annual spend and whether individual connectors carry their own charge are all absent from the public site, so three of the numbers that determine total cost only appear inside a proposal.

Systran

  • Per-seat web pricing at $25.99 to $49.99 a user per month is far more expensive than the raw per-character cost of Google, Microsoft or Amazon’s APIs for high-volume, low-touch use cases.
  • On-premises Enterprise deployment requires infrastructure and IT resourcing that a simple cloud API call does not, adding real implementation cost and time.
  • Enterprise and Systran.io pricing is not published, so budgeting for that tier requires a sales quote before any real comparison is possible.
  • Its market share and brand recognition are smaller than Google, Microsoft or Amazon, so integration examples, community support and third-party tooling are less abundant.
  • Translation quality for common language pairs is broadly comparable to the major cloud APIs, so the main reason to pay a premium is data residency, not superior output.

Pricing, plan by plan

Smartling

On request
  • Core$undefined/year
    • Subscription price not published
    • Basic workflow, user and project management
    • Browser CAT editor with visual context
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Subscription price not published
    • Fully configurable dynamic workflows
    • Translation memory with unlimited storage
  • Language services, charged separately per word$undefined/year
    • Machine translation from 0.0075 USD per word
    • AI translation from 0.06 USD per word
    • AI translation with human review from 0.12 USD per word

Systran

On request
  • Translate Pro Plus$25.99/month
    • Per user per month
    • 55 languages, file translation, up to 10 users
  • Translate Pro Premium$49.99/month
    • Per user per month
    • CAT tool/TMS connectors, roughly 2,000 pages of text
  • Systran Enterprise / Systran.io$undefined/year
    • Quoted pricing
    • On-premises installation or hosted API
    • Custom model training and SLA-backed support

Which should you pick?

Choose Smartling if

  • You need translation memory.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want visual context cat editor.
Smartling review

Choose Systran if

  • You need systran translate pro.
  • You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
  • You also want systran enterprise.
Systran review

Questions people ask

Is Smartling or Systran better?
Neither clearly leads. Smartling starts at On request and Systran at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Smartling or Systran?
Smartling starts at On request and Systran at On request.
Does Smartling or Systran run on more platforms?
Smartling runs on Web, API. Systran runs on Web, Windows, Linux.
What is Smartling best used for?
Smartling is most often used for a company that wants one supplier answerable for both the translation platform and the quality of the translated output, marketing sites where a translator needs to see the rendered page, not a spreadsheet of strings, to get tone and length right, replacing a platform vendor plus several separate agencies with a single contract and a single invoice, content operations at a volume where per-word rates are the dominant cost and the tooling fee is noise. Of those, a company that wants one supplier answerable for both the translation platform and the quality of the translated output and marketing sites where a translator needs to see the rendered page, not a spreadsheet of strings, to get tone and length right are not what Systran is typically brought in for.
What can Smartling do that Systran cannot?
Smartling covers Translation memory, Visual context CAT editor, Configurable workflows, First-party language services. Systran covers Systran Translate Pro, Systran Enterprise, Systran.io, CAT tool and TMS connectors.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Smartling: Is there a free plan?

The Core tier is advertised as free to start, but translation memory is kept for only 180 days on it and any production deployment is a quoted subscription. Treat it as an evaluation route, not a plan.

Systran: Why would I pay more for Systran than Google’s API?

Primarily for on-premises deployment, where translation never leaves your own network, which matters for government, defence or confidentiality-bound organisations.

Smartling: What does the platform actually cost?

Smartling does not publish it. The published figures are per-word service rates. Expect an annual subscription sized against your content volume, workflows and language count, quoted after a scoping call.

Systran: Is Systran priced per character like Google or Amazon?

The Translate Pro web plans are priced per user per month; only the Enterprise and Systran.io API products are usage-based, and their pricing is quoted rather than published.

Smartling: Can I use Smartling with my own translators?

Yes, the platform works with your own vendors and freelancers. You then pay for software and forgo the services revenue the pricing model is built around, which weakens your negotiating position on the subscription.

Systran: Who owns Systran now?

It operates as part of ChapsVision, a French technology group, following a series of ownership changes.

Smartling: What happens to my translation memory if I leave?

Translation memory is exportable, but on Core it only covers the previous 180 days, so leaving after two years on the entry tier means most of the asset is already gone.

Share

Related pages

More on Smartling

More on Systran

Keep looking

Other head to heads