Translation · head to head
DeepL vs Smartling

Smartling
Translation
Enterprise translation management sold alongside first-party language services priced per word
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only DeepL has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DeepL pricing details not displayed on homepage; requires visiting separate pricing page; Smartling translation memory is retained for only 180 days on the Core tier, so the asset that would make a future migration cheap expires on the plan most likely to be used by a team testing the water.
- They diverge on capability: DeepL covers 30+ languages, Smartling covers Translation memory.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DeepL and Smartling actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Translation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DeepL
- 30+ languages
- Document translation
- Glossary
- Formal/informal toggle
- Browser extension
- API access
- Desktop app
- Web support
Only in Smartling
- Translation memory
- Visual context CAT editor
- Configurable workflows
- First-party language services
- Linguistic quality assurance
- Connectors and API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DeepL
- ai tools managementnot Smartling
- Workflow automationnot Smartling
- Reportingnot Smartling
Smartling
- A company that wants one supplier answerable for both the translation platform and the quality of the translated outputnot DeepL
- Marketing sites where a translator needs to see the rendered page, not a spreadsheet of strings, to get tone and length rightnot DeepL
- Replacing a platform vendor plus several separate agencies with a single contract and a single invoicenot DeepL
- Content operations at a volume where per-word rates are the dominant cost and the tooling fee is noisenot DeepL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DeepL
- Pricing details not displayed on homepage; requires visiting separate pricing page
- Free tier limitations not specified on main site
Smartling
- Translation memory is retained for only 180 days on the Core tier, so the asset that would make a future migration cheap expires on the plan most likely to be used by a team testing the water.
- The platform subscription is not published while the per-word service rates are, so you can model the variable cost precisely and cannot model the fixed cost at all until you have been through a sales sizing exercise.
- The vendor earns on words routed through it, so the commercial relationship rewards volume flowing to Smartling rather than volume being avoided through better reuse of existing memory.
- Per-word pricing multiplies by target language, so adding a market to a product that ships in twelve languages costs a thirteenth of the current translation bill rather than a marginal amount.
- Minimum contract term, minimum annual spend and whether individual connectors carry their own charge are all absent from the public site, so three of the numbers that determine total cost only appear inside a proposal.
Pricing, plan by plan
DeepL
Free- FreeFree
- 3 document translations
- 5000 characters
- Starter$8.99/month
- 5 documents/month
- Unlimited text
- Advanced$28.99/month
- 20 documents/month
- Glossary
Smartling
On request- Core$undefined/year
- Subscription price not published
- Basic workflow, user and project management
- Browser CAT editor with visual context
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Subscription price not published
- Fully configurable dynamic workflows
- Translation memory with unlimited storage
- Language services, charged separately per word$undefined/year
- Machine translation from 0.0075 USD per word
- AI translation from 0.06 USD per word
- AI translation with human review from 0.12 USD per word
Which should you pick?
Choose DeepL if
- You need 30+ languages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile, Api.
- You also want document translation.
Choose Smartling if
- You need translation memory.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want visual context cat editor.
Questions people ask
- Is DeepL or Smartling better?
- Neither clearly leads. DeepL starts at Free and Smartling at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DeepL or Smartling?
- DeepL has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DeepL and On request for Smartling.
- Does DeepL or Smartling run on more platforms?
- DeepL runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile, Api. Smartling runs on Web, API.
- Can I use DeepL for free?
- Yes. DeepL has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Smartling starts at On request.
- What is DeepL best used for?
- DeepL is most often used for ai tools management, workflow automation, reporting. Of those, ai tools management and workflow automation are not what Smartling is typically brought in for.
- What can DeepL do that Smartling cannot?
- DeepL covers 30+ languages, Document translation, Glossary, Formal/informal toggle. Smartling covers Translation memory, Visual context CAT editor, Configurable workflows, First-party language services.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DeepL: Does DeepL offer a free version?
Yes. DeepL offers free trial access and a free API key option, plus a paid DeepL Pro subscription tier and Enterprise solutions.
SourceSmartling: Is there a free plan?
The Core tier is advertised as free to start, but translation memory is kept for only 180 days on it and any production deployment is a quoted subscription. Treat it as an evaluation route, not a plan.
DeepL: How many languages does DeepL support?
DeepL supports translation into 100+ languages including popular pairs like English-Chinese, English-French, and Chinese-English.
SourceSmartling: What does the platform actually cost?
Smartling does not publish it. The published figures are per-word service rates. Expect an annual subscription sized against your content volume, workflows and language count, quoted after a scoping call.
DeepL: Does DeepL support voice translation?
Yes. DeepL Voice enables real-time voice translation in virtual meetings and in-person conversations for instant collaboration.
SourceSmartling: Can I use Smartling with my own translators?
Yes, the platform works with your own vendors and freelancers. You then pay for software and forgo the services revenue the pricing model is built around, which weakens your negotiating position on the subscription.
Smartling: What happens to my translation memory if I leave?
Translation memory is exportable, but on Core it only covers the previous 180 days, so leaving after two years on the entry tier means most of the asset is already gone.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DeepL vs Crowdin
- DeepL vs Twine
- DeepL vs memoQ
- DeepL vs Phrase
- DeepL vs Lokalise
- DeepL vs Transifex
- DeepL vs Weglot
- DeepL vs Amazon Translate
- DeepL vs Google Translate
- DeepL vs Gengo
- DeepL vs Microsoft Translator
- DeepL vs Unbabel
- DeepL vs wxrks
- DeepL vs Localazy
- DeepL vs Pontoon
- DeepL vs SDL Trados Studio
- DeepL vs Systran
- DeepL vs XTM Cloud
- DeepL vs Smartcat
- DeepL vs Plunet
- DeepL vs XTRF
- DeepL vs Wordbee
- DeepL vs Reverso
- DeepL vs Sonix
- Smartling vs Crowdin
- Smartling vs Twine
- Smartling vs memoQ
- Smartling vs Phrase
- Smartling vs Lokalise
- Smartling vs Transifex
- Smartling vs Weglot
- Smartling vs Amazon Translate
- Smartling vs Google Translate
- Smartling vs Gengo
- Smartling vs Microsoft Translator
- Smartling vs Unbabel
- Smartling vs wxrks
- Smartling vs Localazy
- Smartling vs Pontoon
- Smartling vs SDL Trados Studio
- Smartling vs Systran
- Smartling vs XTM Cloud
- Smartling vs Smartcat
- Smartling vs Plunet
- Smartling vs XTRF
- Smartling vs Wordbee
- Smartling vs Reverso
- Smartling vs Sonix

