Utilities · head to head
Syncthing vs WizTree

Syncthing
Utilities
Continuous file synchronisation between your own devices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WizTree
Utilities
Windows disk space analyser that reads the NTFS master file table, scanning a drive in seconds
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Syncthing synchronisation, not backup: a deletion propagates to every device, and versioning must be configured deliberately; WizTree it is free for personal use only, so deploying it across company machines without licences is a compliance problem rather than a saving.
- They diverge on capability: Syncthing covers Peer-to-peer sync, WizTree covers Master file table scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Syncthing and WizTree actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Syncthing
- Peer-to-peer sync
- Encrypted transport
- File versioning
- Selective sync
Only in WizTree
- Master file table scanning
- File list view
- Treemap
- Hard link handling
- Portable version
- File deletion and export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Syncthing
- Keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud accountnot WizTree
- Syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasonsnot WizTree
- Replacing a paid cloud storage subscription for sync-only needsnot WizTree
WizTree
- Clearing a full system drive quickly when someone is waiting and a multi-minute scan is unacceptablenot Syncthing
- Finding large files across a whole volume without knowing which folder to look innot Syncthing
- Repeated checks on a machine where disk space fills unpredictablynot Syncthing
- Support work where the scan must finish while you are still on the callnot Syncthing
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Syncthing
- Synchronisation, not backup: a deletion propagates to every device, and versioning must be configured deliberately
- Devices must be online simultaneously to sync, so an always-on machine is effectively required
- Initial setup involves exchanging device IDs and is less approachable than signing into a cloud service
- No web access to files, since there is no server holding them
WizTree
- It is free for personal use only, so deploying it across company machines without licences is a compliance problem rather than a saving.
- The speed advantage exists only on local NTFS volumes; network shares, exFAT, FAT32 and ReFS fall back to ordinary directory scanning and lose the advantage entirely.
- Reading the master file table requires administrator rights, so it cannot be used by standard users on managed machines without an elevation policy.
- It is Windows only, with no macOS or Linux build, so a mixed estate needs a second tool anyway.
- It analyses one machine at a time with no scheduling or central reporting, so it is a diagnostic tool rather than a way to manage storage across an organisation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Syncthing
Free- SyncthingFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
WizTree
Free- WizTree FreeFree
- Full scanning and treemap features
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- No feature limitations for home users
- WizTree Professional and Enterprise$undefined/year
- Licence required for any business use
- Per-user and site licensing tiers
- Commercial deployment rights
Which should you pick?
Choose Syncthing if
- You need peer-to-peer sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Docker.
- You also want encrypted transport.
Choose WizTree if
- You need master file table scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want file list view.
Questions people ask
- Is Syncthing or WizTree better?
- Neither clearly leads. Syncthing starts at Free and WizTree at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Syncthing or WizTree?
- Syncthing starts at Free and WizTree at Free.
- Does Syncthing or WizTree run on more platforms?
- Syncthing runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Docker. WizTree runs on Windows.
- Can I use Syncthing for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Syncthing best used for?
- Syncthing is most often used for keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud account, syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasons, replacing a paid cloud storage subscription for sync-only needs. Of those, keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud account and syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasons are not what WizTree is typically brought in for.
- What can Syncthing do that WizTree cannot?
- Syncthing covers Peer-to-peer sync, Encrypted transport, File versioning, Selective sync. WizTree covers Master file table scanning, File list view, Treemap, Hard link handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Syncthing: Is Syncthing free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee and no storage costs, because there is no server.
WizTree: Why is it so much faster than other analysers?
It reads the NTFS master file table, the index the filesystem already maintains, instead of walking directories. It is one read of a structure rather than thousands of folder operations.
Syncthing: Is Syncthing a backup tool?
No. It synchronises, so deletions propagate. Use it alongside a real backup, not instead of one.
WizTree: Can I use the free version at work?
No. The free build is licensed for personal use only, and business use requires a paid licence. WinDirStat and TreeSize Free are the no-cost options that allow commercial use.
Syncthing: Do my files pass through anyone else’s servers?
No. Transfers are peer to peer and encrypted. Discovery and relay servers can help devices find each other, and relayed traffic remains encrypted end to end.
WizTree: Is it fast on network drives?
No. Master file table access needs local NTFS. Over a network share it scans conventionally and is no faster than the alternatives.
WizTree: Does it need administrator rights?
Yes, for master file table access. Without elevation it either cannot scan or falls back to the slow method.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Syncthing vs FreeFileSync
- Syncthing vs Rclone
- Syncthing vs PeaZip
- Syncthing vs CCleaner
- Syncthing vs GParted
- Syncthing vs balenaEtcher
- Syncthing vs Rufus
- Syncthing vs Everything
- Syncthing vs Truecaller
- Syncthing vs Paste
- Syncthing vs Maccy
- Syncthing vs Hazel
- Syncthing vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- Syncthing vs Google Lens
- Syncthing vs HWiNFO
- Syncthing vs TreeSize
- Syncthing vs 7-Zip
- Syncthing vs WinDirStat
- Syncthing vs AutoHotkey
- Syncthing vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Syncthing vs McDonalds
- Syncthing vs Find My
- Syncthing vs Magnet
- Syncthing vs Sedaru
- WizTree vs FreeFileSync
- WizTree vs Rclone
- WizTree vs PeaZip
- WizTree vs CCleaner
- WizTree vs GParted
- WizTree vs balenaEtcher
- WizTree vs Rufus
- WizTree vs Everything
- WizTree vs Truecaller
- WizTree vs Paste
- WizTree vs Maccy
- WizTree vs Hazel
- WizTree vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- WizTree vs Google Lens
- WizTree vs HWiNFO
- WizTree vs TreeSize
- WizTree vs 7-Zip
- WizTree vs WinDirStat
- WizTree vs AutoHotkey
- WizTree vs CrystalDiskInfo
- WizTree vs McDonalds
- WizTree vs Find My
- WizTree vs Magnet
- WizTree vs Sedaru
