Utilities · head to head
Syncthing vs TreeSize

Syncthing
Utilities
Continuous file synchronisation between your own devices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TreeSize
Utilities
Windows disk space analyser whose free edition may be used commercially, with paid tiers for scheduled reporting
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Syncthing synchronisation, not backup: a deletion propagates to every device, and versioning must be configured deliberately; TreeSize it traverses directories rather than reading the NTFS master file table, so a local drive scan takes noticeably longer than the fastest alternatives.
- They diverge on capability: Syncthing covers Peer-to-peer sync, TreeSize covers Free edition licensed for business.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Syncthing and TreeSize actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Syncthing
- Peer-to-peer sync
- Encrypted transport
- File versioning
- Selective sync
Only in TreeSize
- Free edition licensed for business
- Network share scanning
- Reports by age and owner
- Duplicate file search
- Scheduled scans
- Exports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Syncthing
- Keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud accountnot TreeSize
- Syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasonsnot TreeSize
- Replacing a paid cloud storage subscription for sync-only needsnot TreeSize
TreeSize
- Deploying one free disk analyser across a company without a personal-use licence problemnot Syncthing
- Reporting on a file server by owner and file age before an archiving or quota decisionnot Syncthing
- Finding duplicate files spread across departmental network sharesnot Syncthing
- Producing a storage report for someone who will read a PDF but not run a scannot Syncthing
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Syncthing
- Synchronisation, not backup: a deletion propagates to every device, and versioning must be configured deliberately
- Devices must be online simultaneously to sync, so an always-on machine is effectively required
- Initial setup involves exchanging device IDs and is less approachable than signing into a cloud service
- No web access to files, since there is no server holding them
TreeSize
- It traverses directories rather than reading the NTFS master file table, so a local drive scan takes noticeably longer than the fastest alternatives.
- It is Windows only, so file servers running Linux or a NAS appliance need a different tool or a share mounted from a Windows machine.
- Useful features are spread across three paid tiers, so the single capability a buyer needs frequently sits two tiers above the one they were considering.
- Scanning large network shares generates significant traffic and takes hours, which means it has to be scheduled rather than run when someone asks the question.
- Pricing is per licence with separate maintenance, so an accurate total for a team requires a quote rather than a figure from the website.
Pricing, plan by plan
Syncthing
Free- SyncthingFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
TreeSize
Free- TreeSize FreeFree
- Folder size analysis and treemap
- Licensed for private and commercial use
- Basic exports
- TreeSize Personal, Professional and Enterprise$undefined/year
- File search, duplicate detection and full exports
- Network share and file server scanning
- Scheduled unattended scans and stored reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Syncthing if
- You need peer-to-peer sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Docker.
- You also want encrypted transport.
Choose TreeSize if
- You need free edition licensed for business.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want network share scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Syncthing or TreeSize better?
- Neither clearly leads. Syncthing starts at Free and TreeSize at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Syncthing or TreeSize?
- Syncthing starts at Free and TreeSize at Free.
- Does Syncthing or TreeSize run on more platforms?
- Syncthing runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Docker. TreeSize runs on Windows.
- Can I use Syncthing for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Syncthing best used for?
- Syncthing is most often used for keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud account, syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasons, replacing a paid cloud storage subscription for sync-only needs. Of those, keeping files in step across personal machines without a cloud account and syncing data that must not sit on a third-party server for policy reasons are not what TreeSize is typically brought in for.
- What can Syncthing do that TreeSize cannot?
- Syncthing covers Peer-to-peer sync, Encrypted transport, File versioning, Selective sync. TreeSize covers Free edition licensed for business, Network share scanning, Reports by age and owner, Duplicate file search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Syncthing: Is Syncthing free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee and no storage costs, because there is no server.
TreeSize: Is TreeSize Free really free for business use?
Yes. JAM Software licenses the free edition for private and commercial use, which is the main reason it appears on corporate machines where other free analysers are not permitted.
Syncthing: Is Syncthing a backup tool?
No. It synchronises, so deletions propagate. Use it alongside a real backup, not instead of one.
TreeSize: Why is it slower than WizTree?
Method. WizTree reads the NTFS master file table; TreeSize walks the directory tree, which is slower but works on network shares and non-NTFS volumes.
Syncthing: Do my files pass through anyone else’s servers?
No. Transfers are peer to peer and encrypted. Discovery and relay servers can help devices find each other, and relayed traffic remains encrypted end to end.
TreeSize: Can it scan a NAS or Linux file server?
It scans them as network shares over SMB, with the speed penalty that implies. There is no agent that runs on the server itself.
TreeSize: What does the Enterprise tier add?
Scheduled unattended scans, stored historical results and reporting across servers, which is the difference between a cleanup tool and a storage reporting system.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Syncthing vs FreeFileSync
- Syncthing vs Rclone
- Syncthing vs PeaZip
- Syncthing vs CCleaner
- Syncthing vs GParted
- Syncthing vs balenaEtcher
- Syncthing vs Rufus
- Syncthing vs Everything
- Syncthing vs Truecaller
- Syncthing vs Paste
- Syncthing vs Maccy
- Syncthing vs Hazel
- Syncthing vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- Syncthing vs Google Lens
- Syncthing vs HWiNFO
- Syncthing vs WinDirStat
- Syncthing vs WizTree
- Syncthing vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Syncthing vs AutoHotkey
- Syncthing vs Shottr
- Syncthing vs Calsense
- Syncthing vs BetterTouchTool
- Syncthing vs Starbucks
- Syncthing vs Transmission
- Syncthing vs Find My
- Syncthing vs Magnet
- TreeSize vs FreeFileSync
- TreeSize vs Rclone
- TreeSize vs PeaZip
- TreeSize vs CCleaner
- TreeSize vs GParted
- TreeSize vs balenaEtcher
- TreeSize vs Rufus
- TreeSize vs Everything
- TreeSize vs Truecaller
- TreeSize vs Paste
- TreeSize vs Maccy
- TreeSize vs Hazel
- TreeSize vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- TreeSize vs Google Lens
- TreeSize vs HWiNFO
- TreeSize vs WinDirStat
- TreeSize vs WizTree
- TreeSize vs CrystalDiskInfo
- TreeSize vs AutoHotkey
- TreeSize vs Shottr
- TreeSize vs Calsense
- TreeSize vs BetterTouchTool
- TreeSize vs Starbucks
- TreeSize vs Transmission
- TreeSize vs Find My
- TreeSize vs Magnet
