Cybersecurity · head to head
Speakeasy vs Stainless

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Stainless
APIs
Generates client SDKs, API docs, and MCP servers from an OpenAPI spec
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Stainless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.; Stainless starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- They diverge on capability: Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Stainless covers SDK generation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Speakeasy and Stainless actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
Only in Stainless
- SDK generation
- MCP server generation
- Docs site generation
- Webhooks and streaming support
- Automated unit tests
- Git integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Stainless
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Stainless
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Stainless
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Stainless
Stainless
- Generating typed SDKs for a public APInot Speakeasy
- Producing an MCP server from an existing OpenAPI specnot Speakeasy
- Building an API documentation site alongside client librariesnot Speakeasy
- Giving open-source APIs a free SDK generation pathnot Speakeasy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Stainless
- Starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- The free plan caps APIs at 25 endpoints, which excludes larger production APIs.
- Overage charges apply per SDK/endpoint/month once limits are exceeded, which can make costs unpredictable at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Stainless
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 generators (SDKs, docs, or MCP servers)
- 5 seats
- APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints
- Starter$undefined/mo
- Unlimited generators
- Expanded seats
- Private SDKs of any size
- Pro$undefined/mo
- Custom enterprise features and pricing
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Dedicated support
- SOC 2 compliance reports
- Purchase order/invoicing with negotiable terms
Which should you pick?
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Choose Stainless if
- You need sdk generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want mcp server generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Speakeasy or Stainless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Speakeasy starts at On request and Stainless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Speakeasy or Stainless?
- Stainless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Speakeasy and Free for Stainless.
- Does Speakeasy or Stainless run on more platforms?
- Both run on web, api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Stainless for free?
- Yes. Stainless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is Speakeasy best used for?
- Speakeasy is most often used for governing ai agents at enterprise scale, preventing shadow ai tool sprawl, enforcing least-privilege access for agents, auditing ai tool call activity for compliance. Of those, governing ai agents at enterprise scale and preventing shadow ai tool sprawl are not what Stainless is typically brought in for.
- What can Speakeasy do that Stainless cannot?
- Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement. Stainless covers SDK generation, MCP server generation, Docs site generation, Webhooks and streaming support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Speakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceStainless: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 5 generators, 5 seats, APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints, and 100 preview builds per month, with email support.
SourceSpeakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceStainless: Who owns the generated SDK code?
The generated SDK code is owned by the customer and published by Stainless under the Apache 2.0 license.
SourceStainless: What happens if I exceed my plan's endpoint limit?
Customers exceeding their endpoint limits are billed per SDK, per endpoint, per month for the overage.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs Swagger
- Speakeasy vs Prisma
- Speakeasy vs Asyncapi
- Speakeasy vs REST Client VSCode
- Speakeasy vs Appwrite
- Speakeasy vs TrueLayer
- Speakeasy vs Griffin
- Speakeasy vs Stoplight
- Speakeasy vs Treasury Prime
- Speakeasy vs Trustly
- Speakeasy vs Paw
- Speakeasy vs RapidAPI
- Speakeasy vs Rutter
- Speakeasy vs Sensedia
- Speakeasy vs Sila
- Speakeasy vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Stainless vs Doppler
- Stainless vs Akeyless
- Stainless vs Tenable
- Stainless vs Endor Labs
- Stainless vs Frontegg
- Stainless vs Netwrix
- Stainless vs Securiti
- Stainless vs Qualys VMDR
- Stainless vs Transcend
- Stainless vs Omada Identity
- Stainless vs Saviynt
- Stainless vs Arnica
- Stainless vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Stainless vs TunnelBear
- Stainless vs Vanta
- Stainless vs Acunetix
- Stainless vs Aikido
- Stainless vs Swagger
- Stainless vs Prisma
- Stainless vs Asyncapi
- Stainless vs REST Client VSCode
- Stainless vs Appwrite
- Stainless vs TrueLayer
- Stainless vs Griffin
- Stainless vs Stoplight
- Stainless vs Treasury Prime
- Stainless vs Trustly
- Stainless vs Paw
- Stainless vs RapidAPI
- Stainless vs Rutter
- Stainless vs Sensedia
- Stainless vs Sila
- Stainless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
