Developer Tools · head to head
Soketi vs Unit21

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Unit21
Cybersecurity
No-code fraud and AML risk operations platform for fintechs and neobanks
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Soketi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.; Unit21 it is built for fintech scale rather than card issuer scale, so organisations reaching very high transaction volumes generally re-evaluate against heavier platforms and face a migration.
- They diverge on capability: Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Unit21 covers No-code rule builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Soketi and Unit21 actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
Only in Unit21
- No-code rule builder
- Case management
- SAR filing
- Backtesting
- Identity and device signals
- Data ingestion API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Unit21
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Unit21
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Unit21
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Unit21
Unit21
- A neobank whose sponsor bank requires a documented monitoring programme before it will keep the BIN sponsorshipnot Soketi
- A crypto exchange needing SAR filing and case management without building an internal compliance engineering teamnot Soketi
- A payments startup where the fraud lead needs to ship a new rule the same day a new attack pattern appearsnot Soketi
- A lender consolidating fraud alerts from three point tools into one investigator queue with a single audit trailnot Soketi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Unit21
- It is built for fintech scale rather than card issuer scale, so organisations reaching very high transaction volumes generally re-evaluate against heavier platforms and face a migration.
- No-code rule authoring shifts power to the risk team, which is the point, but without governance it produces rule sprawl that nobody can explain to an examiner two years later.
- Detection quality depends on the signals you feed it, so a thin integration produces thin results and the platform cannot compensate with proprietary consortium data the way larger vendors do.
- Pricing is quoted by volume with an annual commitment, so a fintech whose growth stalls pays for headroom it did not use.
- SAR filing coverage is oriented to United States FinCEN reporting, so firms filing in the United Kingdom, European Union or Asia handle those submissions outside the tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Unit21
On request- Unit21 Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by monitored volume and modules, annual contract
- Fraud, AML and case management packaged separately
- Implementation and historical data backfill quoted with the subscription
Which should you pick?
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Soketi or Unit21 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Soketi starts at Free and Unit21 at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Soketi or Unit21?
- Soketi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Soketi and On request for Unit21.
- Does Soketi or Unit21 run on more platforms?
- Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Unit21 runs on Web.
- Can I use Soketi for free?
- Yes. Soketi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Unit21 starts at On request.
- What is Soketi best used for?
- Soketi is most often used for a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider, realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons, a local or ci environment that needs a pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid account, a high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure bill. Of those, a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider and realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons are not what Unit21 is typically brought in for.
- What can Soketi do that Unit21 cannot?
- Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends. Unit21 covers No-code rule builder, Case management, SAR filing, Backtesting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Unit21: Do we need engineers to run it?
Only for the initial data integration. After that the design intent is that risk and compliance staff author and deploy rules themselves.
Soketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Unit21: Does it file SARs?
Yes, it generates and electronically files suspicious activity reports to FinCEN. Non-US regimes are not covered to the same depth.
Soketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Unit21: Can we test a rule before it goes live?
Yes. Backtesting against historical data to see projected alert volume is one of the more useful parts of the product, because alert volume is the real cost.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Feedzai
- Soketi vs ThetaRay
- Soketi vs Sardine
- Soketi vs NICE Actimize
- Soketi vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Soketi vs Socure
- Soketi vs Quantexa
- Soketi vs Fenergo
- Soketi vs Transmit Security
- Soketi vs Jumio
- Soketi vs Silent Eight
- Soketi vs Sumsub
- Soketi vs IDnow
- Soketi vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Soketi vs LogicManager
- Soketi vs Mullvad VPN
- Soketi vs Private Internet Access
- Unit21 vs PartyKit
- Unit21 vs Penpot
- Unit21 vs Atlantis
- Unit21 vs Coder
- Unit21 vs Backstage
- Unit21 vs Xlinesoft
- Unit21 vs Bazel
- Unit21 vs Eclipse IDE
- Unit21 vs Pants Build
- Unit21 vs Ansible
- Unit21 vs Helix
- Unit21 vs Jitsu
- Unit21 vs Avo
- Unit21 vs Azure DevOps
- Unit21 vs Bitbucket
- Unit21 vs Claude Code
- Unit21 vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Unit21 vs Feedzai
- Unit21 vs ThetaRay
- Unit21 vs Sardine
- Unit21 vs NICE Actimize
- Unit21 vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Unit21 vs Socure
- Unit21 vs Quantexa
- Unit21 vs Fenergo
- Unit21 vs Transmit Security
- Unit21 vs Jumio
- Unit21 vs Silent Eight
- Unit21 vs Sumsub
- Unit21 vs IDnow
- Unit21 vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Unit21 vs LogicManager
- Unit21 vs Mullvad VPN
- Unit21 vs Private Internet Access
