Developer Tools · head to head
Soketi vs Tuta

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Tuta
Cybersecurity
Secure, green and ad-free. Email to feel good about.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.; Tuta individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Soketi and Tuta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
Only in Tuta
Nothing recorded that Soketi does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Tuta
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Tuta
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Tuta
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Tuta
Tuta
- Private encrypted email communicationnot Soketi
- Users valuing end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge architecturenot Soketi
- Individuals seeking open-source email clientsnot Soketi
- Organizations requiring quantum-resistant encryptionnot Soketi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Tuta
- Individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site
- Family plan pricing separate (EUR 3 or EUR 8 per additional user) not included in main pricing
- Shared mailboxes require additional EUR 3-8 monthly charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Tuta
Free- Free PlanFree
- 1 GB storage
- 1 calendar
- 3 labels
- Revolutionary Plan$3/month
- 20 GB storage
- 15 email aliases
- 3 custom domains
- Legend Plan$8/month
- 500 GB storage
- 30 email aliases
- 10 custom domains
Which should you pick?
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Soketi or Tuta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Soketi starts at Free and Tuta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Soketi or Tuta?
- Soketi starts at Free and Tuta at Free.
- Does Soketi or Tuta run on more platforms?
- Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Tuta runs on Web.
- Can I use Soketi for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Soketi best used for?
- Soketi is most often used for a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider, realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons, a local or ci environment that needs a pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid account, a high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure bill. Of those, a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider and realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons are not what Tuta is typically brought in for.
- What can Soketi do that Tuta cannot?
- Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Tuta: How much does Tuta email cost?
Tuta offers a free plan with 1 GB storage. Paid plans are EUR 3/month (Revolutionary) with 20 GB storage and 15 email aliases, and EUR 8/month (Legend) with 500 GB storage and 30 email aliases. Family plan add-ons cost EUR 3-8 per additional mailbox member monthly.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Tuta: Is there a free email plan with Tuta?
Yes, Tuta's free plan includes 1 GB of storage, one calendar, three labels, and full end-to-end encryption security features with no custom domains or email aliases.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Tuta: What are the limits on Tuta's free email plan?
The free plan provides 1 GB storage, access to one calendar, three labels maximum, and no support for custom domains or additional email aliases.
SourceSoketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Proton Mail
- Soketi vs Brave Browser
- Soketi vs OneTrust
- Soketi vs Very Good Security
- Soketi vs 1Password
- Soketi vs Norton 360
- Soketi vs LastPass
- Soketi vs HashiCorp Vault
- Soketi vs Cisco Duo
- Soketi vs IDnow
- Soketi vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Soketi vs Mullvad VPN
- Soketi vs Ory Kratos
- Soketi vs OWASP ZAP
- Soketi vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Soketi vs Passbolt
- Soketi vs Ping Identity
- Soketi vs Proofpoint
- Tuta vs PartyKit
- Tuta vs Penpot
- Tuta vs Atlantis
- Tuta vs Coder
- Tuta vs Backstage
- Tuta vs Xlinesoft
- Tuta vs Bazel
- Tuta vs Eclipse IDE
- Tuta vs Pants Build
- Tuta vs Ansible
- Tuta vs Helix
- Tuta vs Jitsu
- Tuta vs Avo
- Tuta vs Azure DevOps
- Tuta vs Bitbucket
- Tuta vs Claude Code
- Tuta vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tuta vs Proton Mail
- Tuta vs Brave Browser
- Tuta vs OneTrust
- Tuta vs Very Good Security
- Tuta vs 1Password
- Tuta vs Norton 360
- Tuta vs LastPass
- Tuta vs HashiCorp Vault
- Tuta vs Cisco Duo
- Tuta vs IDnow
- Tuta vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Tuta vs Mullvad VPN
- Tuta vs Ory Kratos
- Tuta vs OWASP ZAP
- Tuta vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Tuta vs Passbolt
- Tuta vs Ping Identity
- Tuta vs Proofpoint
