Developer Tools · head to head
Soketi vs Speakeasy

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Soketi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Soketi and Speakeasy actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Speakeasy
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Speakeasy
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Speakeasy
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Soketi
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Soketi
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Soketi
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Soketi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Soketi or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Soketi starts at Free and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Soketi or Speakeasy?
- Soketi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Soketi and On request for Speakeasy.
- Does Soketi or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- Can I use Soketi for free?
- Yes. Soketi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is Soketi best used for?
- Soketi is most often used for a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider, realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons, a local or ci environment that needs a pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid account, a high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure bill. Of those, a laravel application that already uses echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime provider and realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasons are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can Soketi do that Speakeasy cannot?
- Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Speakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Speakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Doppler
- Soketi vs Akeyless
- Soketi vs Tenable
- Soketi vs Endor Labs
- Soketi vs Frontegg
- Soketi vs Netwrix
- Soketi vs Securiti
- Soketi vs Qualys VMDR
- Soketi vs Transcend
- Soketi vs Omada Identity
- Soketi vs Saviynt
- Soketi vs Arnica
- Soketi vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Soketi vs TunnelBear
- Soketi vs Vanta
- Soketi vs Acunetix
- Soketi vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs PartyKit
- Speakeasy vs Penpot
- Speakeasy vs Atlantis
- Speakeasy vs Coder
- Speakeasy vs Backstage
- Speakeasy vs Xlinesoft
- Speakeasy vs Bazel
- Speakeasy vs Eclipse IDE
- Speakeasy vs Pants Build
- Speakeasy vs Ansible
- Speakeasy vs Helix
- Speakeasy vs Jitsu
- Speakeasy vs Avo
- Speakeasy vs Azure DevOps
- Speakeasy vs Bitbucket
- Speakeasy vs Claude Code
- Speakeasy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
