APIs · head to head
Skyflow vs Very Good Security

Skyflow
APIs
Data privacy vault that holds sensitive records outside your own systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Skyflow reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Skyflow and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Skyflow | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month |
| Platforms | API, Web, Self-hosted | Web, API |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Skyflow
- Tokenised storage
- Polymorphic encryption
- Field level access policies
- Data residency
- Secure functions
- Detokenisation gateway
- Audit trail
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
Both cover
- PCI scope reduction
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Skyflow
- A fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave PCI DSS assessment scopenot Very Good Security
- A company entering India or the EU with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operationsnot Very Good Security
- A health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reportingnot Very Good Security
- An engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every servicenot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Skyflow
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Skyflow
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Skyflow
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Skyflow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Skyflow
- Reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- Every read of a protected field becomes a network call to a third party, so latency and an external availability dependency enter paths that were previously local database reads, and outage planning has to account for a vendor you do not control.
- Analytics and joins on vaulted data are constrained; work that was a simple SQL join now happens through secure functions or on tokens, and data teams routinely discover this after the engineering team has committed.
- Unwinding the vault later is a rewrite rather than a migration because tokens are threaded through every service, so the switching cost climbs steadily and the negotiating position at renewal weakens with each release.
- Scope reduction is an architectural claim your own assessor must accept, so the audit saving is real only if the implementation genuinely keeps sensitive values off your systems, and partial implementations that leave a cache or a log line in place deliver the cost without the benefit.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Skyflow
On request- Skyflow Data Privacy Vault$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus usage by data subject count
- Priced additionally per data residency region
- PCI Level 1, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA coverage
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Skyflow if
- You need tokenised storage.
- You work on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want polymorphic encryption.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want network tokenisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Skyflow or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Skyflow starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Skyflow or Very Good Security?
- Skyflow starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month.
- Does Skyflow or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Skyflow runs on API, Web, Self-hosted. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- What is Skyflow best used for?
- Skyflow is most often used for a fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave pci dss assessment scope, a company entering india or the eu with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operations, a health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reporting, an engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every service. Of those, a fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave pci dss assessment scope and a company entering india or the eu with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operations are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Skyflow do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Polymorphic encryption, Field level access policies, Data residency. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality, Card issuing data. Both handle PCI scope reduction.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Skyflow: Does Skyflow really take my systems out of PCI scope?
It can, if card data never touches your infrastructure and the detokenisation happens at the boundary. Your QSA has to agree the design, so validate the architecture with your assessor before signing.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Skyflow: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Reported annual contracts sit around 195,000 US dollars, built from a platform fee plus usage by data subject count and additional charges per data residency region.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Skyflow: How does it help with data localisation?
Records can be pinned to a specified region, so an Indian or EU residency requirement is met by the vault rather than by you running regional databases and operations teams.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Skyflow: Can I still run analytics on vaulted data?
Partly. Aggregates and comparisons are supported through polymorphic encryption and secure functions, but arbitrary joins against other datasets are harder than they were, and this is the most common late surprise.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Skyflow vs Basis Theory
- Skyflow vs Paymentology
- Skyflow vs Akoya
- Skyflow vs Skaleet
- Skyflow vs Volt
- Skyflow vs Tink
- Skyflow vs Increase
- Skyflow vs Yodlee
- Skyflow vs Griffin
- Skyflow vs Trustly
- Skyflow vs Method Financial
- Skyflow vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Skyflow vs LiteLLM
- Skyflow vs Neonomics
- Skyflow vs Payload CMS
- Skyflow vs Portkey
- Skyflow vs Baffle
- Skyflow vs HashiCorp Vault
- Skyflow vs Feedzai
- Skyflow vs Securiti
- Skyflow vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Skyflow vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Skyflow vs LastPass
- Skyflow vs DataGrail
- Skyflow vs 1Password
- Skyflow vs Transcend
- Skyflow vs Doppler
- Skyflow vs Tuta
- Skyflow vs Delinea
- Skyflow vs Envysion
- Skyflow vs Frontegg
- Skyflow vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Basis Theory
- Very Good Security vs Paymentology
- Very Good Security vs Akoya
- Very Good Security vs Skaleet
- Very Good Security vs Volt
- Very Good Security vs Tink
- Very Good Security vs Increase
- Very Good Security vs Yodlee
- Very Good Security vs Griffin
- Very Good Security vs Trustly
- Very Good Security vs Method Financial
- Very Good Security vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Very Good Security vs LiteLLM
- Very Good Security vs Neonomics
- Very Good Security vs Payload CMS
- Very Good Security vs Portkey
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
