Cybersecurity · head to head
Sigstore vs Sweep

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.; Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- They diverge on capability: Sigstore covers Fulcio, Sweep covers Autocomplete.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sigstore and Sweep actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Sweep
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Sweep
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Sweep
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Sweep
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot Sigstore
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot Sigstore
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot Sigstore
- Code review and quality assurancenot Sigstore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Pricing, plan by plan
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Which should you pick?
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Questions people ask
- Is Sigstore or Sweep better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sigstore starts at Free and Sweep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sigstore or Sweep?
- Sigstore starts at Free and Sweep at Free.
- Does Sigstore or Sweep run on more platforms?
- Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Sigstore best used for?
- Sigstore is most often used for open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority, organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product, publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of you, self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptable. Of those, open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority and organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product are not what Sweep is typically brought in for.
- What can Sigstore do that Sweep cannot?
- Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients. Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceSigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceSigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceSigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs GitHub Copilot
- Sigstore vs Refact
- Sigstore vs PhpStorm
- Sigstore vs JetBrains Rider
- Sigstore vs Pieces for Developers
- Sigstore vs Cody
- Sigstore vs Deep Code
- Sigstore vs Pants Build
- Sigstore vs Fig
- Sigstore vs Namespace
- Sigstore vs Nix
- Sigstore vs Nixpacks
- Sigstore vs Octopus Deploy
- Sigstore vs Okteto
- Sigstore vs OpsLevel
- Sigstore vs RubyMine
- Sigstore vs Sourcegraph
- Sigstore vs GoLand
- Sweep vs Cosign
- Sweep vs Syft
- Sweep vs Logto
- Sweep vs Infisical
- Sweep vs Chainguard
- Sweep vs Ory
- Sweep vs OWASP ZAP
- Sweep vs Bitwarden
- Sweep vs Semgrep
- Sweep vs Trivy
- Sweep vs authentik
- Sweep vs Authelia
- Sweep vs Resolver
- Sweep vs Saviynt
- Sweep vs Securiti
- Sweep vs Speakeasy
- Sweep vs Sysdig
- Sweep vs Tenable
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand

