Cybersecurity · head to head
Sigstore vs Surfshark

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sigstore has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.; Surfshark smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- They diverge on capability: Sigstore covers Fulcio, Surfshark covers Unlimited devices.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sigstore and Surfshark actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
Only in Surfshark
- Unlimited devices
- CleanWeb ad blocker
- MultiHop
- Camouflage Mode
- NoBorders mode
- Kill Switch
- Bypasser split tunneling
- Rotating IP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Surfshark
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Surfshark
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Surfshark
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Surfshark
Surfshark
- Vpnnot Sigstore
- Privacynot Sigstore
- Security Suitenot Sigstore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Surfshark
- Smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Lower brand recognition compared to established VPN providers
- Limited customer service availability in some time zones
Pricing, plan by plan
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Surfshark
$1.78/month- Starter$1.78/month
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 4,500+ servers
- Basic VPN
- One$3.59/month
- VPN
- Antivirus
- Personal data leak alert
- One+$4/month
- All One features
- Incogi included
Which should you pick?
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Choose Surfshark if
- You need unlimited devices.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want cleanweb ad blocker.
Questions people ask
- Is Sigstore or Surfshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sigstore starts at Free and Surfshark at $1.78/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sigstore or Surfshark?
- Sigstore has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Sigstore and $1.78/month for Surfshark.
- Does Sigstore or Surfshark run on more platforms?
- Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Surfshark runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Yes. Sigstore has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Surfshark starts at $1.78/month.
- What is Sigstore best used for?
- Sigstore is most often used for open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority, organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product, publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of you, self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptable. Of those, open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority and organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product are not what Surfshark is typically brought in for.
- What can Sigstore do that Surfshark cannot?
- Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients. Surfshark covers Unlimited devices, CleanWeb ad blocker, MultiHop, Camouflage Mode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Surfshark: Does Surfshark maintain a no-logs policy?
Yes. Surfshark does not log browsing history, visited IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or network traffic. This policy was independently verified by Deloitte in 2025.
SourceSigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Surfshark: How many simultaneous device connections does Surfshark allow?
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all subscription plans, enabling protection of every device in a household with a single subscription.
SourceSigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs CyberGhost VPN
- Sigstore vs ProtonVPN
- Sigstore vs NordVPN
- Sigstore vs Avast One
- Sigstore vs McAfee Total Protection
- Sigstore vs Norton 360
- Sigstore vs IVPN
- Sigstore vs Mullvad VPN
- Sigstore vs Windscribe
- Sigstore vs TunnelBear
- Sigstore vs Private Internet Access
- Sigstore vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Sigstore vs iDenfy
- Sigstore vs IDnow
- Sigstore vs Jumio
- Sigstore vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Sigstore vs LogicManager
- Sigstore vs ExpressVPN
- Surfshark vs Cosign
- Surfshark vs Syft
- Surfshark vs Logto
- Surfshark vs Infisical
- Surfshark vs Chainguard
- Surfshark vs Ory
- Surfshark vs OWASP ZAP
- Surfshark vs Bitwarden
- Surfshark vs Semgrep
- Surfshark vs Trivy
- Surfshark vs authentik
- Surfshark vs Authelia
- Surfshark vs Resolver
- Surfshark vs Saviynt
- Surfshark vs Securiti
- Surfshark vs Speakeasy
- Surfshark vs Sysdig
- Surfshark vs Tenable
- Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN
- Surfshark vs ProtonVPN
- Surfshark vs NordVPN
- Surfshark vs Avast One
- Surfshark vs McAfee Total Protection
- Surfshark vs Norton 360
- Surfshark vs IVPN
- Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Surfshark vs Windscribe
- Surfshark vs TunnelBear
- Surfshark vs Private Internet Access
- Surfshark vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Surfshark vs iDenfy
- Surfshark vs IDnow
- Surfshark vs Jumio
- Surfshark vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Surfshark vs LogicManager
- Surfshark vs ExpressVPN

