Insurance · head to head
Shift Technology vs Transmit Security

Shift Technology
Insurance
AI-native fraud detection for insurance
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Shift Technology pricing not published on vendor website, requires demo request and quotation; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: Shift Technology covers Fraud detection, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Shift Technology and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Shift Technology | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Insurance | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Shift Technology
- Fraud detection
- Claims automation
- Document intelligence
- Network analysis
- Real-time scoring
- Investigation workbench
- Predictive analytics
- Machine learning models
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Shift Technology
- Fraud detectionnot Transmit Security
- Claims automationnot Transmit Security
- SIU operationsnot Transmit Security
- Subrogationnot Transmit Security
- Underwriting risknot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Shift Technology
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Shift Technology
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Shift Technology
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Shift Technology
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Shift Technology
- Pricing not published on vendor website, requires demo request and quotation
- No self-service onboarding; dedicated sales consultation mandatory
- Solution requires on-premises deployment or custom SaaS configuration
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Shift Technology
On request- Fraud Detection$undefined/year
- Claims fraud detection
- Network analysis
- Real-time scoring
- Claims Automation$undefined/year
- Document analysis
- Automated extraction
- Workflow automation
- Enterprise Suite$undefined/year
- All modules
- Custom models
- Global deployment
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Shift Technology if
- You need fraud detection.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want claims automation.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Shift Technology or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Shift Technology starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Shift Technology or Transmit Security?
- Shift Technology starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request.
- Does Shift Technology or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Shift Technology runs on Web, Api. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Shift Technology best used for?
- Shift Technology is most often used for fraud detection, claims automation, siu operations, subrogation. Of those, fraud detection and claims automation are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Shift Technology do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Shift Technology covers Fraud detection, Claims automation, Document intelligence, Network analysis. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Shift Technology: How much does Shift Technology cost?
Shift Technology does not publish pricing on its website. The vendor requires a demo request and direct sales contact for custom quotations tailored to deployment scope and use cases. Pricing is quote-based and depends on specific implementation needs.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Shift Technology: What is Shift Technology's licensing model?
Shift Technology operates on a custom licensing model rather than standardized tiers. Pricing and licensing are determined through consultation with the vendor based on the number of users, data volume, and specific insurance processes being automated.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Shift Technology
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Shift Technology vs Duck Creek Policy
- Shift Technology vs Duck Creek
- Shift Technology vs FRISS
- Shift Technology vs Origami Risk
- Shift Technology vs Tarmika
- Shift Technology vs Insurity Suite
- Shift Technology vs Snapsheet Claims
- Shift Technology vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Shift Technology vs Applied Epic
- Shift Technology vs Splice Software
- Shift Technology vs TurboRater
- Shift Technology vs Verisk
- Shift Technology vs Vertafore Content
- Shift Technology vs AgencyBloc
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Shift Technology vs Descope
- Shift Technology vs NICE Actimize
- Shift Technology vs Beyond Identity
- Shift Technology vs Sardine
- Shift Technology vs Feedzai
- Shift Technology vs Socure
- Shift Technology vs Unit21
- Shift Technology vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Shift Technology vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Shift Technology vs Ping Identity
- Shift Technology vs Stytch
- Shift Technology vs Rhombus Systems
- Shift Technology vs Semgrep
- Shift Technology vs Spot AI
- Shift Technology vs Syft
- Shift Technology vs ThetaRay
- Shift Technology vs Trivy
- Shift Technology vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Transmit Security vs Duck Creek Policy
- Transmit Security vs Duck Creek
- Transmit Security vs FRISS
- Transmit Security vs Origami Risk
- Transmit Security vs Tarmika
- Transmit Security vs Insurity Suite
- Transmit Security vs Snapsheet Claims
- Transmit Security vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Transmit Security vs Applied Epic
- Transmit Security vs Splice Software
- Transmit Security vs TurboRater
- Transmit Security vs Verisk
- Transmit Security vs Vertafore Content
- Transmit Security vs AgencyBloc
- Transmit Security vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Transmit Security vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
