Cybersecurity · head to head
SentinelOne Singularity vs Syft

SentinelOne Singularity
Cybersecurity
Autonomous AI-powered endpoint security
- From
- $5.83/month
- Rated
- -

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: SentinelOne Singularity deployment and configuration requires professional services ($5,000 to $25,000); Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: SentinelOne Singularity covers Behavioral AI, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SentinelOne Singularity and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | SentinelOne Singularity | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5.83/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Cloud, Mobile | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SentinelOne Singularity
- Behavioral AI
- Autonomous response
- ActiveEDR
- Storyline technology
- Rollback remediation
- Ranger IoT
- Cloud workload protection
- Identity security
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SentinelOne Singularity
- Endpoint Securitynot Syft
- Edrnot Syft
- Xdrnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot SentinelOne Singularity
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot SentinelOne Singularity
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot SentinelOne Singularity
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot SentinelOne Singularity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SentinelOne Singularity
- Deployment and configuration requires professional services ($5,000 to $25,000)
- Optional modules like Ranger and Vigilance add to total cost of ownership
- Complex pricing tiers make budgeting difficult for large deployments
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
SentinelOne Singularity
$5.83/month- Singularity Core$5.83/month per endpoint
- Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
- Malware prevention
- Threat isolation
- Singularity Control$6.67/month per endpoint
- All Core features
- Device control
- Firewall control
- Singularity Complete$8.25/month per endpoint
- All Control features
- Endpoint Detection and Response
- XDR capabilities
- Singularity Commercial$17.5/month per endpoint
- All Complete features
- Identity protection
- Cloud protection
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose SentinelOne Singularity if
- You need behavioral ai.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Cloud, Mobile.
- You also want autonomous response.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is SentinelOne Singularity or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. SentinelOne Singularity starts at $5.83/month and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SentinelOne Singularity or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $5.83/month for SentinelOne Singularity and Free for Syft.
- Does SentinelOne Singularity or Syft run on more platforms?
- SentinelOne Singularity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Cloud, Mobile. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SentinelOne Singularity starts at $5.83/month.
- What is SentinelOne Singularity best used for?
- SentinelOne Singularity is most often used for endpoint security, edr, xdr. Of those, endpoint security and edr are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can SentinelOne Singularity do that Syft cannot?
- SentinelOne Singularity covers Behavioral AI, Autonomous response, ActiveEDR, Storyline technology. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SentinelOne Singularity: What does SentinelOne Singularity XDR cover?
Singularity XDR unifies detection and response across endpoints, cloud, identity, network, and mobile, providing centralized visibility and automated response across all attack surfaces.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
SentinelOne Singularity: How does SentinelOne correlate data across security tools?
Singularity normalizes data from endpoints, identity, cloud, and third-party security tools into a unified data layer, enabling automatic correlation of signals without manual integration.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
SentinelOne Singularity: Can SentinelOne integrate with existing security tools?
Yes, Singularity Marketplace provides pre-built, one-click integrations with email, network, firewall, and SaaS security tools, avoiding vendor lock-in while extending detection capabilities.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
SentinelOne Singularity: What is the pricing model for SentinelOne Singularity?
SentinelOne pricing ranges from $5.83 to $17.50 per endpoint per month across five tiers, with optional add-on modules and enterprise pricing available on request.
SourceSyft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on SentinelOne Singularity
Other head to heads
- SentinelOne Singularity vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- SentinelOne Singularity vs VMware Carbon Black
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Sophos Intercept X
- SentinelOne Singularity vs IBM QRadar
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Tanium
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Darktrace
- SentinelOne Singularity vs LogRhythm SIEM
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Fortinet FortiGate
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Jamf Pro
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Keeper Password Manager
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Keygen
- SentinelOne Singularity vs KnowBe4
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Legit Security
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Microsoft Sentinel
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Cosign
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Sigstore
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Trivy
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Chainguard
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Metasploit
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Wireshark
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Semgrep
- SentinelOne Singularity vs OWASP ZAP
- SentinelOne Singularity vs HashiCorp Vault
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Bitwarden
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Infisical
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Tenable Nessus
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Transmit Security
- SentinelOne Singularity vs TrustArc
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Syft vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Syft vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Syft vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Sophos Intercept X
- Syft vs IBM QRadar
- Syft vs Tanium
- Syft vs Darktrace
- Syft vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Syft vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Syft vs Jamf Pro
- Syft vs Keeper Password Manager
- Syft vs Keygen
- Syft vs KnowBe4
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
