Cybersecurity · head to head
Keygen vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keygen specific Active Licensed User (ALU) pricing not listed; requires interactive pricing calculator; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keygen and Syft actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keygen
Nothing recorded that Syft does not also cover.
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keygen
- Software licensing and distributionnot Syft
- Product release managementnot Syft
- API-based license verificationnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Keygen
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Keygen
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Keygen
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Keygen
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keygen
- Specific Active Licensed User (ALU) pricing not listed; requires interactive pricing calculator
- Whitelabel API add-on costs $995/year per domain
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keygen
Free- DevFree
- Up to 100 Active Licensed Users
- 10 product releases
- Core licensing API only
- Std$null/month
- Scaling with licensing volume
- Distribution API (OCI/Docker, npm, Rubygems, PyPI, Tauri)
- Flat monthly/yearly fees
- Enterprise$null/month
- Audit logs
- SAML/SSO
- IP filtering
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Keygen or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keygen starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keygen or Syft?
- Keygen starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does Keygen or Syft run on more platforms?
- Keygen runs on Web. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Keygen for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keygen best used for?
- Keygen is most often used for software licensing and distribution, product release management, api-based license verification. Of those, software licensing and distribution and product release management are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Keygen do that Syft cannot?
- Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keygen: Does Keygen have a free tier?
Yes, the Dev tier is free and supports up to 100 Active Licensed Users with 10 product releases and core licensing API access.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Keygen: How is Keygen pricing calculated?
Keygen uses scalable, flat monthly or yearly fees based on your licensing volume (Active Licensed Users). No revenue share or transaction fees are charged.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Keygen: Does Keygen charge for additional features like SSO?
SAML/SSO is included in Enterprise tiers. Whitelabel API support costs $995/year per domain. Premium Support SLA is $995/month for Enterprise.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Keygen vs LastPass
- Keygen vs 1Password
- Keygen vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keygen vs Norton 360
- Keygen vs Infisical
- Keygen vs Logto
- Keygen vs Teleport
- Keygen vs Snyk
- Keygen vs Bitwarden
- Keygen vs Brave Browser
- Keygen vs WireGuard
- Keygen vs Semgrep
- Keygen vs Enpass
- Keygen vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Keygen vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Keygen vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Keygen vs HID Global
- Keygen vs IBM QRadar
- Keygen vs Cosign
- Keygen vs Sigstore
- Keygen vs Trivy
- Keygen vs Chainguard
- Keygen vs Metasploit
- Keygen vs Wireshark
- Keygen vs Legit Security
- Keygen vs OWASP ZAP
- Keygen vs HashiCorp Vault
- Keygen vs Tenable Nessus
- Keygen vs Transmit Security
- Keygen vs TrustArc
- Keygen vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Keygen vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Logto
- Syft vs Teleport
- Syft vs Snyk
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Brave Browser
- Syft vs WireGuard
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Enpass
- Syft vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Syft vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Syft vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Syft vs HID Global
- Syft vs IBM QRadar
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

