Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

LogRhythm SIEM vs Syft

LogRhythm SIEM logo

LogRhythm SIEM

Cybersecurity

AI-powered SIEM platform for modern security operations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Syft logo

Syft

Cybersecurity

Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: LogRhythm SIEM no pricing published; sales contact required; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
  • They diverge on capability: LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics, Syft covers Multi-format output.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which LogRhythm SIEM and Syft actually diverge.

Attributes where LogRhythm SIEM and Syft differ
AttributeLogRhythm SIEMSyft
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionOpen source, no licence fee
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, ApimacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker
Founded2003Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in LogRhythm SIEM

  • AI-driven analytics
  • UEBA
  • NDR integration
  • SOAR automation
  • Threat lifecycle management
  • Case management
  • Compliance reporting
  • Embedded playbooks

Only in Syft

  • Multi-format output
  • Broad ecosystem coverage
  • Binary classifiers
  • In-toto attestations
  • Library and CLI
  • Pairs with Grype

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

LogRhythm SIEM

  • Security information and event managementnot Syft
  • Threat detection and incident responsenot Syft
  • Compliance monitoring and reportingnot Syft
  • User and entity behavior analyticsnot Syft

Syft

  • Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot LogRhythm SIEM
  • Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot LogRhythm SIEM
  • Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot LogRhythm SIEM
  • Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot LogRhythm SIEM

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

LogRhythm SIEM

  • No pricing published; sales contact required
  • No public information on licensing model or per-unit costs

Syft

  • Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
  • Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
  • Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
  • Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
  • An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.

Pricing, plan by plan

LogRhythm SIEM

On request
  • LogRhythm SIEMFree
    • Threat detection
    • Log management
    • Compliance
  • LogRhythm AxonFree
    • Cloud-native SIEM
    • Self-service deployment
    • Elastic scaling
  • Managed Detection & ResponseFree
    • 24/7 monitoring
    • Expert analysts
    • Threat hunting

Syft

Free
  • SyftFree
    • Apache-2.0
    • No usage limits
    • Community support
  • Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Policy enforcement and reporting
    • Federal and commercial tiers
    • Pricing not published, quoted on request

Which should you pick?

Choose LogRhythm SIEM if

  • You need ai-driven analytics.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want ueba.
LogRhythm SIEM review

Choose Syft if

  • You need multi-format output.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
  • You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Syft review

Questions people ask

Is LogRhythm SIEM or Syft better?
Neither clearly leads. LogRhythm SIEM starts at On request and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, LogRhythm SIEM or Syft?
Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for LogRhythm SIEM and Free for Syft.
Does LogRhythm SIEM or Syft run on more platforms?
LogRhythm SIEM runs on Web, Api. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
Can I use Syft for free?
Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LogRhythm SIEM starts at On request.
What is LogRhythm SIEM best used for?
LogRhythm SIEM is most often used for security information and event management, threat detection and incident response, compliance monitoring and reporting, user and entity behavior analytics. Of those, security information and event management and threat detection and incident response are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
What can LogRhythm SIEM do that Syft cannot?
LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics, UEBA, NDR integration, SOAR automation. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

LogRhythm SIEM: How does Exabeam (formerly LogRhythm SIEM) handle pricing?

Exabeam does not publish pricing on its website. To obtain pricing information, request a demo through the website or contact Exabeam's sales team directly for a personalized quote based on your deployment size and requirements.

Source
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?

No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.

LogRhythm SIEM: Is there a free trial or freemium version of Exabeam?

Exabeam does not advertise a free trial or freemium tier on its homepage. Interested buyers must contact the sales team to discuss trial availability and pricing options.

Source
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?

No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.

Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?

No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.

Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?

Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.

Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?

You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.

Share

Related pages

More on LogRhythm SIEM

More on Syft

Keep looking

Other head to heads