Cybersecurity · head to head
Sardine vs Tilt

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Tilt
Developer Tools
Local Kubernetes development loop that rebuilds and live-updates containers on save
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Tilt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.; Tilt docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- They diverge on capability: Sardine covers Device intelligence, Tilt covers Live update.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sardine and Tilt actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
Only in Tilt
- Live update
- Tiltfile as code
- Unified web UI
- Selective rebuilds
- Local and remote clusters
- Resource dependencies
- Extensions registry
- Custom buttons and triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot Tilt
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot Tilt
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot Tilt
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot Tilt
Tilt
- A team of ten or more engineers whose application is fifteen microservices on Kubernetes and who currently wait on CI to test a changenot Sardine
- An organisation onboarding new developers who want a single command that stands up the whole stack from a committed Tiltfilenot Sardine
- A platform team giving product engineers a consistent local environment against a shared remote development clusternot Sardine
- A codebase where one repository contains several services and rebuilding all of them on every edit is the main source of lost timenot Sardine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Tilt
- Docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- The Tiltfile is Starlark, a Python dialect, so non-trivial setups become real programs that need reviewing and maintaining, and the person who wrote yours becomes a single point of failure.
- Live update only works when the running container can accept synced files and restart the process; compiled languages, distroless images and read-only filesystems often force you back to a full image rebuild, which removes the main benefit.
- It assumes Kubernetes. If your development target is plain Docker Compose or serverless functions, Tilt adds a cluster you did not need and a layer of abstraction with no payoff.
- There is no commercial support contract, no SLA and no paid tier, so when a Kubernetes version upgrade breaks something you are dependent on GitHub issues and a Slack channel rather than a vendor you can escalate to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Tilt
Free- TiltFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All features, no paid tier
- Community support via the Kubernetes Slack #tilt channel
Which should you pick?
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Choose Tilt if
- You need live update.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want tiltfile as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Sardine or Tilt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sardine starts at On request and Tilt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sardine or Tilt?
- Tilt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Sardine and Free for Tilt.
- Does Sardine or Tilt run on more platforms?
- Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tilt runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Tilt for free?
- Yes. Tilt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sardine starts at On request.
- What is Sardine best used for?
- Sardine is most often used for a neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfer, a crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their owner, a fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristics, a lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not contain. Of those, a neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfer and a crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their owner are not what Tilt is typically brought in for.
- What can Sardine do that Tilt cannot?
- Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring. Tilt covers Live update, Tiltfile as code, Unified web UI, Selective rebuilds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
Tilt: Is Tilt free?
Yes, entirely. It is Apache 2.0 open source with no paid tier and no licence fee.
Sardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
Tilt: Who owns Tilt now?
Docker, which acquired it in May 2022. It remains open source and the repository is still actively maintained.
Sardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
Tilt: Do I need a remote cluster?
No. It works against a local cluster such as kind, minikube or Docker Desktop, and also against a shared remote development cluster if your services are too heavy to run locally.
Tilt: How is it different from Skaffold?
Both automate the build-deploy loop. Tilt puts more weight on the live-update path and a multi-service dashboard; Skaffold is more configuration-driven and closer to Google's tooling.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Acunetix
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Authelia
- Sardine vs Okteto
- Sardine vs Dagger
- Sardine vs Bazel
- Sardine vs Backstage
- Sardine vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Sardine vs Pants Build
- Sardine vs Atlantis
- Sardine vs Garden
- Sardine vs Jitsu
- Sardine vs Visual Studio Code
- Sardine vs Penpot
- Sardine vs Eclipse IDE
- Sardine vs Hookdeck
- Sardine vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sardine vs Namespace
- Sardine vs Nix
- Sardine vs Nixpacks
- Sardine vs Octopus Deploy
- Tilt vs Unit21
- Tilt vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tilt vs Feedzai
- Tilt vs NICE Actimize
- Tilt vs Socure
- Tilt vs ThetaRay
- Tilt vs Transmit Security
- Tilt vs Jumio
- Tilt vs iDenfy
- Tilt vs Silent Eight
- Tilt vs Sumsub
- Tilt vs Quantexa
- Tilt vs TunnelBear
- Tilt vs Vanta
- Tilt vs Acunetix
- Tilt vs Aikido
- Tilt vs Arnica
- Tilt vs Authelia
- Tilt vs Okteto
- Tilt vs Dagger
- Tilt vs Bazel
- Tilt vs Backstage
- Tilt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tilt vs Pants Build
- Tilt vs Atlantis
- Tilt vs Garden
- Tilt vs Jitsu
- Tilt vs Visual Studio Code
- Tilt vs Penpot
- Tilt vs Eclipse IDE
- Tilt vs Hookdeck
- Tilt vs JFrog Artifactory
- Tilt vs Namespace
- Tilt vs Nix
- Tilt vs Nixpacks
- Tilt vs Octopus Deploy
