Cybersecurity · head to head
RoboForm vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: RoboForm free plan is restricted to a single device; syncing across multiple devices requires the Premium plan; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which RoboForm and Syft actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in RoboForm
Nothing recorded that Syft does not also cover.
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
RoboForm
- Auto-filling passwords across multiple devices and websitesnot Syft
- Sharing family passwords securely with household membersnot Syft
- Receiving alerts when credentials appear in data breachesnot Syft
- Granting emergency access to trusted contacts for account recoverynot Syft
- Enforcing multi-factor authentication across online accountsnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot RoboForm
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot RoboForm
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot RoboForm
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot RoboForm
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
RoboForm
- Free plan is restricted to a single device; syncing across multiple devices requires the Premium plan
- Premium's advertised $2.49 per month rate is a first-year discount that renews at $29.88 per year
- Family plan covers only up to 5 accounts and likewise renews at a higher $47.75 per year after the first-year discount
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
RoboForm
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited passwords on single device
- Advanced 2FA
- Password breach monitoring 5 emails
- Premium$2.49/month
- Billed annually
- All Free features
- Unlimited devices
- Family$3.98/month
- Billed annually
- Up to 5 Premium accounts
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is RoboForm or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. RoboForm starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, RoboForm or Syft?
- RoboForm starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does RoboForm or Syft run on more platforms?
- RoboForm runs on Web. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use RoboForm for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is RoboForm best used for?
- RoboForm is most often used for auto-filling passwords across multiple devices and websites, sharing family passwords securely with household members, receiving alerts when credentials appear in data breaches, granting emergency access to trusted contacts for account recovery. Of those, auto-filling passwords across multiple devices and websites and sharing family passwords securely with household members are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can RoboForm do that Syft cannot?
- Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
RoboForm: How much does RoboForm cost?
Premium plan is $2.49 per month when billed annually ($29.88/year renewal rate). Family plan supports up to 5 Premium accounts at $3.98 per month annual. Free plan is available with basic password management.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
RoboForm: Is there a money-back guarantee?
Yes, RoboForm offers a 30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- RoboForm vs LastPass
- RoboForm vs 1Password
- RoboForm vs Norton 360
- RoboForm vs Bitdefender Total Security
- RoboForm vs NordPass
- RoboForm vs McAfee Total Protection
- RoboForm vs Authy
- RoboForm vs Enpass
- RoboForm vs Bitwarden
- RoboForm vs Sticky Password
- RoboForm vs Cisco Duo
- RoboForm vs Clerk
- RoboForm vs Securiti
- RoboForm vs Sigstore
- RoboForm vs Speakeasy
- RoboForm vs Sysdig
- RoboForm vs Tenable
- RoboForm vs Trend Micro Vision One
- RoboForm vs Cosign
- RoboForm vs Trivy
- RoboForm vs Chainguard
- RoboForm vs Metasploit
- RoboForm vs Wireshark
- RoboForm vs Semgrep
- RoboForm vs Legit Security
- RoboForm vs OWASP ZAP
- RoboForm vs HashiCorp Vault
- RoboForm vs Infisical
- RoboForm vs Tenable Nessus
- RoboForm vs Transmit Security
- RoboForm vs TrustArc
- RoboForm vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- RoboForm vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs NordPass
- Syft vs McAfee Total Protection
- Syft vs Authy
- Syft vs Enpass
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Sticky Password
- Syft vs Cisco Duo
- Syft vs Clerk
- Syft vs Securiti
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Speakeasy
- Syft vs Sysdig
- Syft vs Tenable
- Syft vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

