Cybersecurity · head to head
Cisco Duo vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cisco Duo free tier limited to 10 users maximum; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cisco Duo and Syft actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cisco Duo
Nothing recorded that Syft does not also cover.
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cisco Duo
- Eliminating phishing with passwordless authnot Syft
- Implementing zero trust with device trustnot Syft
- Protecting sessions from hijacking and theftnot Syft
- Managing compliance for regulated industriesnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Cisco Duo
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Cisco Duo
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Cisco Duo
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Cisco Duo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cisco Duo
- Free tier limited to 10 users maximum
- Licenses must be purchased in 10-user increments (under 100 users) or 25-user increments (100+ users)
- Pricing is per-user per-month with minimum purchase increments
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cisco Duo
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Seamless integrations
- Authenticator app
- Essentials$3/month
- All Free features
- Duo Directory
- Phishing-resistant MFA
- Advantage$6/month
- All Essentials features
- Identity intelligence
- Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR)
- Premier$9/month
- All Advantage features
- Complete device trust
- VPN-less remote access
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Cisco Duo or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cisco Duo starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cisco Duo or Syft?
- Cisco Duo starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does Cisco Duo or Syft run on more platforms?
- Cisco Duo runs on Web. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Cisco Duo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cisco Duo best used for?
- Cisco Duo is most often used for eliminating phishing with passwordless auth, implementing zero trust with device trust, protecting sessions from hijacking and theft, managing compliance for regulated industries. Of those, eliminating phishing with passwordless auth and implementing zero trust with device trust are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Cisco Duo do that Syft cannot?
- Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cisco Duo: How much does Cisco Duo cost?
Cisco Duo Free is $0/user/month (up to 10 users). Paid plans start at $3/user/month (Essentials), $6/user/month (Advantage), and $9/user/month (Premier). Billing is per-user per-month.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Cisco Duo: Is Cisco Duo free to try?
Yes, Duo Free offers multi-factor authentication and seamless integrations at $0/user/month for up to 10 users.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Cisco Duo: What is the minimum purchase for Cisco Duo?
Organizations must buy licenses in 10-user increments for under 100 users, or 25-user increments for 100 or more users. Plans are modifiable at any time.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Cisco Duo: What does the Advantage plan add over Essentials?
Advantage ($6/user/month) adds identity intelligence, Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR), Duo Passport, session theft protection, Active Directory Defense, and risk-based authentication.
SourceSyft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cisco Duo vs Beyond Identity
- Cisco Duo vs HID Global
- Cisco Duo vs 1Password
- Cisco Duo vs Norton 360
- Cisco Duo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cisco Duo vs LastPass
- Cisco Duo vs Authy
- Cisco Duo vs Stytch
- Cisco Duo vs Descope
- Cisco Duo vs Google Authenticator
- Cisco Duo vs Sardine
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne
- Cisco Duo vs Shufti Pro
- Cisco Duo vs Signicat
- Cisco Duo vs Silent Eight
- Cisco Duo vs Socket
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cisco Duo vs Cosign
- Cisco Duo vs Sigstore
- Cisco Duo vs Trivy
- Cisco Duo vs Chainguard
- Cisco Duo vs Metasploit
- Cisco Duo vs Wireshark
- Cisco Duo vs Semgrep
- Cisco Duo vs Legit Security
- Cisco Duo vs OWASP ZAP
- Cisco Duo vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cisco Duo vs Bitwarden
- Cisco Duo vs Infisical
- Cisco Duo vs Tenable Nessus
- Cisco Duo vs Transmit Security
- Cisco Duo vs TrustArc
- Cisco Duo vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Cisco Duo vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Syft vs Beyond Identity
- Syft vs HID Global
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs Authy
- Syft vs Stytch
- Syft vs Descope
- Syft vs Google Authenticator
- Syft vs Sardine
- Syft vs SentinelOne
- Syft vs Shufti Pro
- Syft vs Signicat
- Syft vs Silent Eight
- Syft vs Socket
- Syft vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

