Developer Tools · head to head
Refact vs Windmill

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Refact requires configuration for optimal performance; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Refact and Windmill actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Windmill
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Windmill
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Windmill
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Refact
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Refact
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Refact
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Refact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Refact or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Refact starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Refact or Windmill?
- Refact starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does Refact or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Refact runs on VS Code, Web. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Refact best used for?
- Refact is most often used for autonomous code generation for development tasks, end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring, multi-language software development acceleration, enterprise development with data privacy requirements. Of those, autonomous code generation for development tasks and end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Refact do that Windmill cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceWindmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceWindmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceWindmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++
- Refact vs n8n
- Refact vs Nango
- Refact vs Airbyte
- Refact vs Flowable
- Refact vs Meltano
- Refact vs RudderStack
- Refact vs Grouparoo
- Refact vs Activiti
- Refact vs jBPM
- Refact vs Merge
- Refact vs Camunda
- Refact vs Flowise
- Refact vs Automate.io
- Refact vs Autonoly
- Refact vs Boomi
- Refact vs Browser Use
- Refact vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs GitHub Copilot
- Windmill vs Swagger UI
- Windmill vs Sweep
- Windmill vs Coder
- Windmill vs Pieces for Developers
- Windmill vs CodeSandbox
- Windmill vs GNU Emacs
- Windmill vs Moonrepo
- Windmill vs Pants Build
- Windmill vs Atlantis
- Windmill vs Backstage
- Windmill vs Visual Studio Code
- Windmill vs Garden
- Windmill vs GitLab CI/CD
- Windmill vs HCP Terraform
- Windmill vs Helm
- Windmill vs Jitsu
- Windmill vs Notepad++
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
