Cybersecurity · head to head
Recorded Future vs Refact

Recorded Future
Cybersecurity
Intelligence-driven cybersecurity
- From
- $25000/year
- Free plan
- No

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Refact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Recorded Future no pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Recorded Future and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | Recorded Future | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cloud | VS Code, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2009 | 2023 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Recorded Future
- Real-time threat intelligence
- Vulnerability intelligence
- Internet-wide data analysis
- Insikt group intelligence
- Brand intelligence
- API-first platform
- Alert and notification system
- Custom reporting
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Recorded Future
- Threat intelligence and monitoringnot Refact
- Dark web monitoring and brand protectionnot Refact
- Third-party risk managementnot Refact
- Security operations and incident responsenot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Recorded Future
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Recorded Future
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Recorded Future
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Recorded Future
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Recorded Future
- No pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- Pricing depends on organization size, usage levels, and services in addition to tier selection
- API usage limits vary by package but limits not specified on pricing page
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Recorded Future
$25000/year- Threat Intelligence$25000/year
- Threat feeds
- IP reputation
- Domain analysis
- Vulnerability Intelligence$35000/year
- CVE monitoring
- Patch intelligence
- Vulnerability trending
- Complete Intelligence$50000/year
- All features
- Analyst access
- Dedicated feed
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Recorded Future if
- You need real-time threat intelligence.
- You work on Web, Api, Cloud.
- You also want vulnerability intelligence.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Recorded Future or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Recorded Future starts at $25000/year and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Recorded Future or Refact?
- Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $25000/year for Recorded Future and Free for Refact.
- Does Recorded Future or Refact run on more platforms?
- Recorded Future runs on Web, Api, Cloud. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Recorded Future starts at $25000/year.
- What is Recorded Future best used for?
- Recorded Future is most often used for threat intelligence and monitoring, dark web monitoring and brand protection, third-party risk management, security operations and incident response. Of those, threat intelligence and monitoring and dark web monitoring and brand protection are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Recorded Future do that Refact cannot?
- Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Vulnerability intelligence, Internet-wide data analysis, Insikt group intelligence. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Recorded Future: What are the main pricing tiers offered by Recorded Future?
Recorded Future offers three tiers: Core (foundational intelligence), Professional (marked most-popular with automation and autonomous threat hunts), and Elite (comprehensive coverage including third-party risk assessment). Specific pricing requires contacting sales.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceRecorded Future: What is included in Recorded Future's Core pricing tier?
Core tier includes cyber operations monitoring with threat and malware insights, digital risk protection covering dark web monitoring and credential detection, and the new digital risk hub. Exact cost depends on organization size and usage.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceRecorded Future: What features does Recorded Future Professional tier add?
Professional tier adds autonomous threat hunts, continuous threat monitoring, automated threat preventions, external intelligence ingestion, and external asset discovery. Pricing is custom-quoted based on organization size and services.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRecorded Future: How does Recorded Future handle user limits and API access?
Recorded Future does not limit the number of platform users or integrations across any tier. API usage limits vary by package tier but exact limits are not specified on the public pricing page.
SourceRelated pages
More on Recorded Future
Other head to heads
- Recorded Future vs Norton 360
- Recorded Future vs 1Password
- Recorded Future vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Recorded Future vs LastPass
- Recorded Future vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Recorded Future vs IBM QRadar
- Recorded Future vs Qualys VMDR
- Recorded Future vs Tenable
- Recorded Future vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Recorded Future vs Darktrace
- Recorded Future vs Proofpoint
- Recorded Future vs NordVPN
- Recorded Future vs Omada Identity
- Recorded Future vs Ory
- Recorded Future vs ProtonVPN
- Recorded Future vs Resolver
- Recorded Future vs Saviynt
- Recorded Future vs GitHub Copilot
- Recorded Future vs Swagger UI
- Recorded Future vs Sweep
- Recorded Future vs Coder
- Recorded Future vs Deep Code
- Recorded Future vs Pieces for Developers
- Recorded Future vs CodeSandbox
- Recorded Future vs GNU Emacs
- Recorded Future vs Moonrepo
- Recorded Future vs Pants Build
- Recorded Future vs Atlantis
- Recorded Future vs Backstage
- Recorded Future vs JetBrains Rider
- Recorded Future vs Spacelift
- Recorded Future vs Argo CD
- Recorded Future vs Blacksmith
- Refact vs Norton 360
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Refact vs IBM QRadar
- Refact vs Qualys VMDR
- Refact vs Tenable
- Refact vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Refact vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Refact vs Darktrace
- Refact vs Proofpoint
- Refact vs NordVPN
- Refact vs Omada Identity
- Refact vs Ory
- Refact vs ProtonVPN
- Refact vs Resolver
- Refact vs Saviynt
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs JetBrains Rider
- Refact vs Spacelift
- Refact vs Argo CD
- Refact vs Blacksmith
