Software · head to head
Redash vs Apache Spark MLlib
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Redash a basic self-hosted deployment needs a minimum of 4GB of RAM, and more RAM and CPU as background workers and API processes grow; Apache Spark MLlib apache Spark MLlib is Apache 2.0 licensed and free with no paid tier from the Apache project itself; SLA-backed support has to be sourced from a third party such as a managed Spark vendor rather than from Apache.
- They diverge on capability: Redash covers SQL Query Editor, Apache Spark MLlib covers Classification.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Redash and Apache Spark MLlib actually diverge.
| Attribute | Redash | Apache Spark MLlib |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, Self-hosted, Cloud | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | 2013 | 1999 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Redash
- SQL Query Editor
- Multiple Data Sources
- Visualizations
- Dashboards
- Alerts
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- BigQuery
Only in Apache Spark MLlib
- Classification
- Regression
- Clustering
- Collaborative filtering
- Feature engineering
- Apache Spark
- Hadoop
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Redash
- Self-hosted SQL query editor and dashboarding over existing databasesnot Apache Spark MLlib
- Sharing scheduled query results with a team without buying a BI licencenot Apache Spark MLlib
Apache Spark MLlib
- Large-scale distributed machine learning on Spark clustersnot Redash
- Classification and regression with decision trees, random forests, gradient-boosted treesnot Redash
- Clustering with K-means and Gaussian Mixture Modelsnot Redash
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Redash
- A basic self-hosted deployment needs a minimum of 4GB of RAM, and more RAM and CPU as background workers and API processes grow
- The official Docker images were not updated for V10, so the documented route is to deploy a V8 instance and then upgrade it
- Anyone not using a provided cloud image has to configure the environment variables and secrets by hand
Apache Spark MLlib
- Apache Spark MLlib is Apache 2.0 licensed and free with no paid tier from the Apache project itself; SLA-backed support has to be sourced from a third party such as a managed Spark vendor rather than from Apache.
Pricing, plan by plan
Redash
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full Features
- Self-hosted
- Community Support
- Cloud$49/month
- Managed Hosting
- Automatic Updates
- Support
Apache Spark MLlib
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache Spark MLlib review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Redash if
- You need sql query editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want multiple data sources.
Choose Apache Spark MLlib if
- You need classification.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want regression.
Questions people ask
- Is Redash or Apache Spark MLlib better?
- Neither clearly leads. Redash starts at Free and Apache Spark MLlib at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Redash or Apache Spark MLlib?
- Redash starts at Free and Apache Spark MLlib at Free.
- Does Redash or Apache Spark MLlib run on more platforms?
- Redash runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud. Apache Spark MLlib runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Redash for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Redash best used for?
- Redash is most often used for self-hosted sql query editor and dashboarding over existing databases, sharing scheduled query results with a team without buying a bi licence. Of those, self-hosted sql query editor and dashboarding over existing databases and sharing scheduled query results with a team without buying a bi licence are not what Apache Spark MLlib is typically brought in for.
- What can Redash do that Apache Spark MLlib cannot?
- Redash covers SQL Query Editor, Multiple Data Sources, Visualizations, Dashboards. Apache Spark MLlib covers Classification, Regression, Clustering, Collaborative filtering.
Related pages
More on Apache Spark MLlib
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Redash vs Tableau
- Redash vs Looker
- Redash vs Metabase
- Redash vs Fibery
- Redash vs Apache Superset
- Redash vs Baserow
- Redash vs Budibase
- Redash vs NocoDB
- Redash vs AWS SageMaker
- Redash vs Google Vertex AI
- Redash vs Azure Machine Learning
- Redash vs DataRobot
- Redash vs Snowflake
- Redash vs TensorFlow
- Redash vs Comet ML
- Redash vs Keras
- Redash vs MLflow
- Redash vs Jupyter
- Redash vs PyTorch
- Redash vs scikit-learn
- Redash vs Weights & Biases
- Redash vs Alteryx
- Redash vs Anaconda
- Redash vs Databricks
- Redash vs Dataiku
- Redash vs DVC
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Tableau
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Looker
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Metabase
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Fibery
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Apache Superset
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Baserow
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Budibase
- Apache Spark MLlib vs NocoDB
- Apache Spark MLlib vs AWS SageMaker
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Google Vertex AI
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Azure Machine Learning
- Apache Spark MLlib vs DataRobot
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Snowflake
- Apache Spark MLlib vs TensorFlow
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Comet ML
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Keras
- Apache Spark MLlib vs MLflow
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Jupyter
- Apache Spark MLlib vs PyTorch
- Apache Spark MLlib vs scikit-learn
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Weights & Biases
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Alteryx
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Anaconda
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Databricks
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Dataiku
- Apache Spark MLlib vs DVC


