Software · head to head
Qwilr vs Strikedeck
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only; Strikedeck product is discontinued and no longer supported or developed
- They diverge on capability: Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Strikedeck covers AI churn prediction.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qwilr and Strikedeck actually diverge.
| Attribute | Qwilr | Strikedeck |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $35/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- E-signatures
- Analytics
- Video embedding
- HubSpot
- Stripe
Only in Strikedeck
- AI churn prediction
- Health scores
- Automated playbooks
- Sentiment analysis
- Usage analytics
- Medallia
- Zendesk
Both cover
- Salesforce
- Slack
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Strikedeck
Strikedeck
- Customer Successnot Qwilr
- Ai Powerednot Qwilr
- Predictive Analyticsnot Qwilr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Strikedeck
- Product is discontinued and no longer supported or developed
- Limited integration options compared to modern customer success platforms
- No longer receiving feature updates or security patches
Pricing, plan by plan
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Strikedeck
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Strikedeck review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Qwilr or Strikedeck better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qwilr starts at $35/month and Strikedeck at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qwilr or Strikedeck?
- Qwilr starts at $35/month and Strikedeck at On request.
- Does Qwilr or Strikedeck run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Qwilr best used for?
- Qwilr is most often used for sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billing. Of those, sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billing is not what Strikedeck is typically brought in for.
- What can Qwilr do that Strikedeck cannot?
- Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Strikedeck covers AI churn prediction, Health scores, Automated playbooks, Sentiment analysis. Both handle Salesforce, Slack, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Strikedeck: What is Strikedeck?
Strikedeck was a customer success platform that used machine learning and predictive analytics to identify customer health risks, sentiment, and engagement opportunities. The platform was acquired by Medallia in May 2019 and has since been discontinued.
SourceStrikedeck: What happened to Strikedeck?
Medallia acquired Strikedeck on May 16, 2019, for $11 million. The platform was subsequently discontinued as Medallia consolidated its customer experience offerings.
SourceStrikedeck: What were Strikedeck's key features?
Strikedeck offered workflow automation, machine learning for customer health scoring, predictive analytics, usage tracking, and instant surveys. It provided real-time customer health dashboards and personalization capabilities.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Bigtincan
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Webex
- Qwilr vs Aviso
- Qwilr vs ChurnZero
- Qwilr vs Planhat
- Qwilr vs Catalyst
- Qwilr vs Custify
- Qwilr vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Qwilr vs SmartKarrot
- Qwilr vs Vitally
- Qwilr vs Akita
- Qwilr vs Amity
- Qwilr vs Apttus
- Qwilr vs Better Proposals
- Qwilr vs Chorus.ai
- Qwilr vs ClientPoint
- Qwilr vs ClientSuccess
- Qwilr vs Conga
- Qwilr vs Kapta
- Qwilr vs Lessonly
- Strikedeck vs Allego
- Strikedeck vs Highspot
- Strikedeck vs Salesloft
- Strikedeck vs PandaDoc
- Strikedeck vs Bigtincan
- Strikedeck vs Brainshark
- Strikedeck vs DealHub
- Strikedeck vs DocuSign
- Strikedeck vs Proposify
- Strikedeck vs Showpad
- Strikedeck vs ZoomInfo
- Strikedeck vs DocuSign CLM
- Strikedeck vs Gainsight
- Strikedeck vs Mindtickle
- Strikedeck vs People.ai
- Strikedeck vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Strikedeck vs Webex
- Strikedeck vs Aviso
- Strikedeck vs ChurnZero
- Strikedeck vs Planhat
- Strikedeck vs Catalyst
- Strikedeck vs Custify
- Strikedeck vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Strikedeck vs SmartKarrot
- Strikedeck vs Vitally
- Strikedeck vs Akita
- Strikedeck vs Amity
- Strikedeck vs Apttus
- Strikedeck vs Better Proposals
- Strikedeck vs Chorus.ai
- Strikedeck vs ClientPoint
- Strikedeck vs ClientSuccess
- Strikedeck vs Conga
- Strikedeck vs Kapta
- Strikedeck vs Lessonly

