No-Code · head to head
Quickbase vs Windmill

Quickbase
No-Code
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Windmill has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Quickbase both paid tiers carry an enforced minimum seat count, 20 for Team and 40 for Business, so a small team pays for seats it does not have people to fill.; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: Quickbase covers Relational app builder, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Quickbase and Windmill actually diverge.
| Attribute | Quickbase | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month, billed annually, with an enforced minimum seat count per tier | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | web, api, linux, windows, mac |
| Category | No-Code | Automation Integration |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Quickbase
- Relational app builder
- Workflow automation
- Reporting and dashboards
- Pipelines integration engine
- Mobile apps
- App governance
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Quickbase
- An operations team of at least 20 people replacing spreadsheet-based process tracking with a structured, auditable appnot Windmill
- A mid-sized company wanting published, comparable per-user pricing rather than an opaque quote-only processnot Windmill
- A project management office standardising workflow automation and reporting across several departmentsnot Windmill
- A business that already knows it needs 40 or more seats, where the Business tier's minimum is not a real constraintnot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Quickbase
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Quickbase
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Quickbase
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Quickbase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Quickbase
- Both paid tiers carry an enforced minimum seat count, 20 for Team and 40 for Business, so a small team pays for seats it does not have people to fill.
- Integration Reads packages, support tier upgrades and professional services are not publicly priced, so the visible per-user rate is only part of the real annual cost.
- It sits in an awkward middle ground: more structure than a spreadsheet or simple form tool, but less process automation depth than Appian or OutSystems for genuinely complex workflows.
- Reporting and dashboarding are capable but not as visually sophisticated as a dedicated business intelligence tool, so heavy analytics users often still export data elsewhere.
- App complexity that grows significantly over time can hit performance and design limitations common to no-code relational tools, requiring a rebuild on a more code-first platform.
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Quickbase
On request- Team$35/month
- Minimum 20 users required (roughly $8,400/year floor)
- Core app building, workflow automation and reporting
- Standard support
- Business$55/month
- Minimum 40 users required (roughly $26,400/year floor)
- Advanced automation, governance and integration features
- Priority support
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom quote
- Advanced governance, security and integration read package volumes
- Dedicated account management
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Quickbase if
- You need relational app builder.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want workflow automation.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Quickbase or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Quickbase starts at On request and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Quickbase or Windmill?
- Windmill has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Quickbase and Free for Windmill.
- Does Quickbase or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Quickbase runs on Web, iOS, Android. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Windmill for free?
- Yes. Windmill has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Quickbase starts at On request.
- What is Quickbase best used for?
- Quickbase is most often used for an operations team of at least 20 people replacing spreadsheet-based process tracking with a structured, auditable app, a mid-sized company wanting published, comparable per-user pricing rather than an opaque quote-only process, a project management office standardising workflow automation and reporting across several departments, a business that already knows it needs 40 or more seats, where the business tier's minimum is not a real constraint. Of those, an operations team of at least 20 people replacing spreadsheet-based process tracking with a structured, auditable app and a mid-sized company wanting published, comparable per-user pricing rather than an opaque quote-only process are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Quickbase do that Windmill cannot?
- Quickbase covers Relational app builder, Workflow automation, Reporting and dashboards, Pipelines integration engine. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Quickbase: Can I buy fewer than 20 seats?
No. The Team plan enforces a 20-user minimum and Business enforces 40, so smaller teams pay for the floor regardless of actual headcount.
Windmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceQuickbase: Is per-user pricing genuinely published?
Yes, unlike most enterprise low-code vendors, Quickbase publishes real per-user monthly rates for Team and Business; Enterprise remains quote-only.
Windmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceQuickbase: What is not included in the per-user price?
Integration Reads packages, support tier upgrades and professional services are priced separately and are not publicly listed.
Windmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Quickbase vs Caspio
- Quickbase vs Zoho Creator
- Quickbase vs Mendix
- Quickbase vs Directual
- Quickbase vs Bubble
- Quickbase vs Appian
- Quickbase vs FlutterFlow
- Quickbase vs Whalesync
- Quickbase vs Thunkable
- Quickbase vs OutSystems
- Quickbase vs Draftbit
- Quickbase vs Momen
- Quickbase vs Noloco
- Quickbase vs Superblocks
- Quickbase vs ToolJet
- Quickbase vs WeWeb
- Quickbase vs n8n
- Quickbase vs Nango
- Quickbase vs Airbyte
- Quickbase vs Flowable
- Quickbase vs Meltano
- Quickbase vs RudderStack
- Quickbase vs Grouparoo
- Quickbase vs Activiti
- Quickbase vs jBPM
- Quickbase vs Merge
- Quickbase vs Camunda
- Quickbase vs Flowise
- Quickbase vs Automate.io
- Quickbase vs Autonoly
- Quickbase vs Boomi
- Quickbase vs Browser Use
- Quickbase vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs Caspio
- Windmill vs Zoho Creator
- Windmill vs Mendix
- Windmill vs Directual
- Windmill vs Bubble
- Windmill vs Appian
- Windmill vs FlutterFlow
- Windmill vs Whalesync
- Windmill vs Thunkable
- Windmill vs OutSystems
- Windmill vs Draftbit
- Windmill vs Momen
- Windmill vs Noloco
- Windmill vs Superblocks
- Windmill vs ToolJet
- Windmill vs WeWeb
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
