Databases · head to head
QuestDB vs Redis

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features; Redis licensing changed from BSD to AGPL in 2025, impacting open-source usage
- They diverge on capability: QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, Redis covers In-memory data store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which QuestDB and Redis actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Only in Redis
- In-memory data store
- Data structures
- Pub/Sub messaging
- Lua scripting
- Transactions
- Persistence options
- Replication
- Clustering
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Redis
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Redis
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Redis
Redis
- Cachingnot QuestDB
- Session managementnot QuestDB
- Real-time analyticsnot QuestDB
- Message queuingnot QuestDB
- Leaderboardsnot QuestDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Redis
- Licensing changed from BSD to AGPL in 2025, impacting open-source usage
- All data must fit in memory, limiting scalability to available RAM
- No built-in support for multi-tenancy
- Limited transaction support compared to traditional databases
Pricing, plan by plan
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Redis
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Redis review.
Which should you pick?
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Choose Redis if
- You need in-memory data store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want data structures.
Questions people ask
- Is QuestDB or Redis better?
- Neither clearly leads. QuestDB starts at Free and Redis at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, QuestDB or Redis?
- QuestDB starts at Free and Redis at Free.
- Does QuestDB or Redis run on more platforms?
- QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP). Redis runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use QuestDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is QuestDB best used for?
- QuestDB is most often used for time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds, real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics, applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time sql, cold parquet archive). Of those, time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds and real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics are not what Redis is typically brought in for.
- What can QuestDB do that Redis cannot?
- QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Redis covers In-memory data store, Data structures, Pub/Sub messaging, Lua scripting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceRedis: Is Redis open source?
Redis was open source under the BSD license since its inception in 2009 and has remained open source. However, in 2024-2025, Redis Labs changed licensing to source-available and AGPL, prompting the creation of Valkey, a BSD-licensed open-source fork.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceRedis: What is Redis used for?
Redis is an in-memory data structure store used primarily as a cache, database, and message broker. It provides high-speed data access for real-time applications, sessions, leaderboards, real-time analytics, and other use cases requiring fast data retrieval.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Supabase
- QuestDB vs Sentry
- QuestDB vs Postgres
- QuestDB vs MongoDB
- QuestDB vs Notion
- QuestDB vs Apache Spark
- QuestDB vs Nagios XI
- QuestDB vs Kubernetes
- QuestDB vs PostHog
- QuestDB vs Jira
- QuestDB vs Mozilla Firefox
- QuestDB vs PagerDuty
- QuestDB vs Personetics
- QuestDB vs Plane
- QuestDB vs Postman
- QuestDB vs Raycast
- QuestDB vs Superhuman
- QuestDB vs Vim
- Redis vs TimescaleDB
- Redis vs PostgreSQL
- Redis vs Cockroach Labs
- Redis vs Amazon Aurora
- Redis vs Airtable
- Redis vs Firebolt
- Redis vs Apache Flink
- Redis vs DuckDB
- Redis vs OpenSearch
- Redis vs ClickHouse
- Redis vs NATS
- Redis vs Canary Labs
- Redis vs Chroma
- Redis vs Cloudinary
- Redis vs Convex
- Redis vs Dgraph
- Redis vs Dragonfly
- Redis vs Apache Druid
- Redis vs Supabase
- Redis vs Sentry
- Redis vs Postgres
- Redis vs MongoDB
- Redis vs Notion
- Redis vs Apache Spark
- Redis vs Nagios XI
- Redis vs Kubernetes
- Redis vs PostHog
- Redis vs Jira
- Redis vs Mozilla Firefox
- Redis vs PagerDuty
- Redis vs Personetics
- Redis vs Plane
- Redis vs Postman
- Redis vs Raycast
- Redis vs Superhuman
- Redis vs Vim

