Cybersecurity · head to head
Qualys VMDR vs WarpBuild

Qualys VMDR
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered vulnerability management licensed per asset, using scanner appliances and a lightweight agent.
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No

WarpBuild
Developer Tools
2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Qualys VMDR licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- They diverge on capability: Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qualys VMDR and WarpBuild actually diverge.
| Attribute | Qualys VMDR | WarpBuild |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Usage-based per minute, varies by runner configuration |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Api | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qualys VMDR
- Cloud Agent
- Scanner appliances
- Authenticated scanning
- TruRisk scoring
- Asset inventory
- Patch Management
- Cloud connectors
- Container sensor
Only in WarpBuild
- Optimized runner infrastructure
- Intelligent caching
- Incremental builds
- Multi-architecture support
- Unlimited concurrency
- Autoscaling
- BYOC support
- Docker builders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qualys VMDR
- A hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coveragenot WarpBuild
- PCI DSS external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirementnot WarpBuild
- An estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three toolsnot WarpBuild
- Organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landednot WarpBuild
WarpBuild
- Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Qualys VMDR
- Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Qualys VMDR
- Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Qualys VMDR
- Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Qualys VMDR
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qualys VMDR
- Licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.
- Ephemeral cloud instances consume asset entitlement until they age out of inventory, so an autoscaling group that creates and destroys hosts hourly can burn licence capacity on machines that existed for minutes, and controlling that means tuning purge policies rather than tuning the cloud.
- Authenticated scanning produces materially better results than unauthenticated, but it requires storing and rotating privileged credentials for every target platform, which is a security project in its own right, and teams that skip it receive reports full of unconfirmed potential findings that nobody trusts.
- The console is a set of modules with separate interfaces, search syntaxes and report engines, so an analyst moving between vulnerability management, policy compliance and web application scanning learns each one, and cross-module reporting usually ends in a spreadsheet or a script against the API.
- The tool surfaces findings far faster than any organisation can remediate them, and it does not solve the ownership problem: without an agreed prioritisation policy and a named owner in IT operations, a first scan producing tens of thousands of findings becomes a dashboard that everyone learns to ignore.
WarpBuild
- Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
- macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
- BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer
Pricing, plan by plan
Qualys VMDR
$3/month- VMDR$3/month
- Per asset
- Vulnerability scanning
- Detection
- VMDR+$5/month
- All VMDR features
- Advanced analytics
- Cloud integration
- VMDR Complete$7/month
- All VMDR+ features
- Threat intel
- Response automation
WarpBuild
On request- Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- Standard performance
- Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- Increased performance
- Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
- 8 vCPU
- 32 GB RAM
- High performance
- Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
- 16 vCPU
- 64 GB RAM
- Enterprise performance
Which should you pick?
Choose Qualys VMDR if
- You need cloud agent.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Api.
- You also want scanner appliances.
Choose WarpBuild if
- You need optimized runner infrastructure.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want intelligent caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Qualys VMDR or WarpBuild better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qualys VMDR or WarpBuild?
- Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month and WarpBuild at On request.
- Does Qualys VMDR or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
- Qualys VMDR runs on Web, Cloud, Api. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- What is Qualys VMDR best used for?
- Qualys VMDR is most often used for a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage, pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement, an estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three tools, organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landed. Of those, a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage and pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
- What can Qualys VMDR do that WarpBuild cannot?
- Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, Scanner appliances, Authenticated scanning, TruRisk scoring. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qualys VMDR: Agent or scanner: which do I need?
Usually both. The agent covers endpoints and servers you control and gives continuous data; scanners cover devices you cannot install an agent on, such as network gear, printers and appliances, and provide the external perimeter view.
WarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?
WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.
SourceQualys VMDR: Does it patch as well as detect?
Yes, through the Patch Management module, which is a separate subscription using the same agent. Core VMDR detects and prioritises but does not deploy fixes.
WarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.
SourceQualys VMDR: How are assets counted for licensing?
By the number of assets in inventory, which includes cloud instances and containers depending on the modules in use. Short-lived cloud assets count until they are purged, so purge settings directly affect what you consume.
WarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?
Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.
SourceQualys VMDR: Can I keep the data in a specific region?
Yes. Qualys operates several regional platform instances and you choose which one your subscription lives on. Moving between them later is not trivial, so decide before onboarding.
Qualys VMDR: Does it scan web applications?
Web Application Scanning is a separate module licensed per application, not part of core VMDR, and it is a dynamic scanner with the usual limits around authenticated flows in single-page applications.
Related pages
More on Qualys VMDR
Other head to heads
- Qualys VMDR vs LastPass
- Qualys VMDR vs 1Password
- Qualys VMDR vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Qualys VMDR vs Norton 360
- Qualys VMDR vs Tenable
- Qualys VMDR vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Qualys VMDR vs Aikido
- Qualys VMDR vs Proofpoint
- Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Qualys VMDR vs Recorded Future
- Qualys VMDR vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Qualys VMDR vs Falco
- Qualys VMDR vs Fenergo
- Qualys VMDR vs Google Authenticator
- Qualys VMDR vs Grype
- Qualys VMDR vs Hanwha Vision
- Qualys VMDR vs Idira
- Qualys VMDR vs Nessus
- Qualys VMDR vs Blacksmith
- Qualys VMDR vs Depot
- Qualys VMDR vs Namespace
- Qualys VMDR vs Earthly
- Qualys VMDR vs Nx Cloud
- Qualys VMDR vs Garden
- Qualys VMDR vs ConfigCat
- Qualys VMDR vs Dagger
- Qualys VMDR vs Nix
- Qualys VMDR vs Rust
- Qualys VMDR vs Ansible
- Qualys VMDR vs Nixpacks
- Qualys VMDR vs PhpStorm
- Qualys VMDR vs Pieces for Developers
- Qualys VMDR vs RAD Studio
- Qualys VMDR vs Refact
- Qualys VMDR vs Restate
- Qualys VMDR vs RubyMine
- WarpBuild vs LastPass
- WarpBuild vs 1Password
- WarpBuild vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WarpBuild vs Norton 360
- WarpBuild vs Tenable
- WarpBuild vs Trend Micro Vision One
- WarpBuild vs Aikido
- WarpBuild vs Proofpoint
- WarpBuild vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- WarpBuild vs Recorded Future
- WarpBuild vs Zscaler Internet Access
- WarpBuild vs Falco
- WarpBuild vs Fenergo
- WarpBuild vs Google Authenticator
- WarpBuild vs Grype
- WarpBuild vs Hanwha Vision
- WarpBuild vs Idira
- WarpBuild vs Nessus
- WarpBuild vs Blacksmith
- WarpBuild vs Depot
- WarpBuild vs Namespace
- WarpBuild vs Earthly
- WarpBuild vs Nx Cloud
- WarpBuild vs Garden
- WarpBuild vs ConfigCat
- WarpBuild vs Dagger
- WarpBuild vs Nix
- WarpBuild vs Rust
- WarpBuild vs Ansible
- WarpBuild vs Nixpacks
- WarpBuild vs PhpStorm
- WarpBuild vs Pieces for Developers
- WarpBuild vs RAD Studio
- WarpBuild vs Refact
- WarpBuild vs Restate
- WarpBuild vs RubyMine
