Cybersecurity · head to head
Qualys VMDR vs Syft

Qualys VMDR
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered vulnerability management licensed per asset, using scanner appliances and a lightweight agent.
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Qualys VMDR licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qualys VMDR and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Qualys VMDR | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Api | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qualys VMDR
- Cloud Agent
- Scanner appliances
- Authenticated scanning
- TruRisk scoring
- Asset inventory
- Patch Management
- Cloud connectors
- Container sensor
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qualys VMDR
- A hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coveragenot Syft
- PCI DSS external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirementnot Syft
- An estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three toolsnot Syft
- Organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landednot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Qualys VMDR
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Qualys VMDR
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Qualys VMDR
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Qualys VMDR
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qualys VMDR
- Licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.
- Ephemeral cloud instances consume asset entitlement until they age out of inventory, so an autoscaling group that creates and destroys hosts hourly can burn licence capacity on machines that existed for minutes, and controlling that means tuning purge policies rather than tuning the cloud.
- Authenticated scanning produces materially better results than unauthenticated, but it requires storing and rotating privileged credentials for every target platform, which is a security project in its own right, and teams that skip it receive reports full of unconfirmed potential findings that nobody trusts.
- The console is a set of modules with separate interfaces, search syntaxes and report engines, so an analyst moving between vulnerability management, policy compliance and web application scanning learns each one, and cross-module reporting usually ends in a spreadsheet or a script against the API.
- The tool surfaces findings far faster than any organisation can remediate them, and it does not solve the ownership problem: without an agreed prioritisation policy and a named owner in IT operations, a first scan producing tens of thousands of findings becomes a dashboard that everyone learns to ignore.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Qualys VMDR
$3/month- VMDR$3/month
- Per asset
- Vulnerability scanning
- Detection
- VMDR+$5/month
- All VMDR features
- Advanced analytics
- Cloud integration
- VMDR Complete$7/month
- All VMDR+ features
- Threat intel
- Response automation
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Qualys VMDR if
- You need cloud agent.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Api.
- You also want scanner appliances.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Qualys VMDR or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qualys VMDR or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Qualys VMDR and Free for Syft.
- Does Qualys VMDR or Syft run on more platforms?
- Qualys VMDR runs on Web, Cloud, Api. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month.
- What is Qualys VMDR best used for?
- Qualys VMDR is most often used for a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage, pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement, an estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three tools, organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landed. Of those, a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage and pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Qualys VMDR do that Syft cannot?
- Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, Scanner appliances, Authenticated scanning, TruRisk scoring. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qualys VMDR: Agent or scanner: which do I need?
Usually both. The agent covers endpoints and servers you control and gives continuous data; scanners cover devices you cannot install an agent on, such as network gear, printers and appliances, and provide the external perimeter view.
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Qualys VMDR: Does it patch as well as detect?
Yes, through the Patch Management module, which is a separate subscription using the same agent. Core VMDR detects and prioritises but does not deploy fixes.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Qualys VMDR: How are assets counted for licensing?
By the number of assets in inventory, which includes cloud instances and containers depending on the modules in use. Short-lived cloud assets count until they are purged, so purge settings directly affect what you consume.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Qualys VMDR: Can I keep the data in a specific region?
Yes. Qualys operates several regional platform instances and you choose which one your subscription lives on. Moving between them later is not trivial, so decide before onboarding.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Qualys VMDR: Does it scan web applications?
Web Application Scanning is a separate module licensed per application, not part of core VMDR, and it is a dynamic scanner with the usual limits around authenticated flows in single-page applications.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Qualys VMDR
Other head to heads
- Qualys VMDR vs LastPass
- Qualys VMDR vs 1Password
- Qualys VMDR vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Qualys VMDR vs Norton 360
- Qualys VMDR vs Tenable
- Qualys VMDR vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Qualys VMDR vs Aikido
- Qualys VMDR vs Proofpoint
- Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Qualys VMDR vs Recorded Future
- Qualys VMDR vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Qualys VMDR vs Falco
- Qualys VMDR vs Fenergo
- Qualys VMDR vs Google Authenticator
- Qualys VMDR vs Grype
- Qualys VMDR vs Hanwha Vision
- Qualys VMDR vs Idira
- Qualys VMDR vs Nessus
- Qualys VMDR vs Cosign
- Qualys VMDR vs Sigstore
- Qualys VMDR vs Trivy
- Qualys VMDR vs Chainguard
- Qualys VMDR vs Metasploit
- Qualys VMDR vs Wireshark
- Qualys VMDR vs Semgrep
- Qualys VMDR vs Legit Security
- Qualys VMDR vs OWASP ZAP
- Qualys VMDR vs HashiCorp Vault
- Qualys VMDR vs Bitwarden
- Qualys VMDR vs Infisical
- Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Nessus
- Qualys VMDR vs Transmit Security
- Qualys VMDR vs TrustArc
- Qualys VMDR vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Qualys VMDR vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs Tenable
- Syft vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Syft vs Aikido
- Syft vs Proofpoint
- Syft vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Syft vs Recorded Future
- Syft vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Syft vs Falco
- Syft vs Fenergo
- Syft vs Google Authenticator
- Syft vs Grype
- Syft vs Hanwha Vision
- Syft vs Idira
- Syft vs Nessus
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
