Agriculture · head to head
Proagrica vs Teralytic

Proagrica
Agriculture
Data integration for agriculture supply chains
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proagrica proagrica's own domain (proagrica.com) now redirects through telusagriculture.com to telus.com/agriculture, and the destination site confirms the product line now operates under TELUS Agriculture branding rather than as an independent Proagrica product.; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: Proagrica covers EDI integration, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proagrica and Teralytic actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proagrica
- EDI integration
- Product data management
- E-commerce platforms
- Order management
- Market analytics
- SAP
- Oracle
- Major retailers
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proagrica
- Data integrationnot Teralytic
- E-commercenot Teralytic
- Supply chainnot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot Proagrica
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot Proagrica
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot Proagrica
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot Proagrica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proagrica
- Proagrica's own domain (proagrica.com) now redirects through telusagriculture.com to telus.com/agriculture, and the destination site confirms the product line now operates under TELUS Agriculture branding rather than as an independent Proagrica product.
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proagrica
$29/month- StandardFree
- Custom pricing
- Data integration
- Basic analytics
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom pricing
- Full suite
- Dedicated support
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose Proagrica if
- You need edi integration.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want product data management.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is Proagrica or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proagrica starts at $29/month and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proagrica or Teralytic?
- Proagrica starts at $29/month and Teralytic at On request.
- Does Proagrica or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- Proagrica runs on Web, Api. Teralytic runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Proagrica best used for?
- Proagrica is most often used for data integration, e-commerce, supply chain. Of those, data integration and e-commerce are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can Proagrica do that Teralytic cannot?
- Proagrica covers EDI integration, Product data management, E-commerce platforms, Order management. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Teralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
Teralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
Teralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
Teralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Proagrica vs Bushel
- Proagrica vs AgriSync
- Proagrica vs CropX
- Proagrica vs Granular
- Proagrica vs Traction
- Proagrica vs DTN Agriculture
- Proagrica vs DJI Agriculture
- Proagrica vs PrecisionHawk
- Proagrica vs DroneDeploy
- Proagrica vs Farmbrite
- Proagrica vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Proagrica vs FarmLogs
- Proagrica vs 365FarmNet
- Proagrica vs Ag-Analytics
- Proagrica vs Ag Leader
- Proagrica vs AgCode
- Proagrica vs AgriWater
- Proagrica vs Agronomic
- Proagrica vs Arable
- Proagrica vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Proagrica vs Soil Scout
- Proagrica vs John Deere Operations Center
- Proagrica vs CeresAI
- Proagrica vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Proagrica vs Cropio
- Proagrica vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Proagrica vs Tend
- Proagrica vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Proagrica vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Proagrica vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs Bushel
- Teralytic vs AgriSync
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs Granular
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs DTN Agriculture
- Teralytic vs DJI Agriculture
- Teralytic vs PrecisionHawk
- Teralytic vs DroneDeploy
- Teralytic vs Farmbrite
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs 365FarmNet
- Teralytic vs Ag-Analytics
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs AgCode
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Agronomic
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Connecterra
