Technology · head to head
PostHog vs Trino

PostHog
Technology
The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trino
Technology
A distributed SQL engine that queries data where it already lives, across object storage, warehouses and operational databases.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PostHog the free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts; Trino trino stores nothing and computes no statistics of its own, so the plan it produces is only as good as the partitioning, file sizes and table statistics on the source; a Hive table of thousands of small files or a lake with no stats produces a slow query the engine cannot improve.
- They diverge on capability: PostHog covers Product analytics, Trino covers Federated querying.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PostHog and Trino actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PostHog
- Product analytics
- Session recording
- Feature flags
- A/B testing
- Heatmaps
- SQL access
- Data warehouse
- Apps platform
Only in Trino
- Federated querying
- Connector architecture
- Predicate and aggregation pushdown
- Massively parallel execution
- Fault-tolerant execution
- Resource groups
- Iceberg and Delta table support
- Standard client protocols
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PostHog
- Product analyticsnot Trino
- Feature experimentationnot Trino
- User behavior trackingnot Trino
- A/B testingnot Trino
- Debug production issuesnot Trino
Trino
- Ad hoc analysis that spans a data lake and one or more operational databases, without building an ingestion pipeline firstnot PostHog
- Serving a BI tool a single SQL endpoint over an estate that is actually several separate storage systemsnot PostHog
- Querying Iceberg or Delta tables on object storage interactively, as the compute layer of a lakehousenot PostHog
- Investigating whether a dataset is worth ingesting, by querying it in place before committing to a pipeline for itnot PostHog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PostHog
- The free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts
- Accounts without a card on file are limited to 1 project; adding one raises it to 6
- Data retention is 1 year until a card is added, which extends it to 7 years
- Support is community-only until the account is on a paid plan
- Error tracking is capped at 100K exceptions and surveys at 1500 responses per month on the free tier
Trino
- Trino stores nothing and computes no statistics of its own, so the plan it produces is only as good as the partitioning, file sizes and table statistics on the source; a Hive table of thousands of small files or a lake with no stats produces a slow query the engine cannot improve.
- Federated queries pull data out of the systems they touch, so a join between a lake table and a production Postgres can put a full table scan onto an OLTP database that other applications depend on, and the person who wrote the query will not see the incident it causes.
- Releases come roughly every one to two weeks with no community long-term support line, and deprecations arrive quickly, so you either dedicate someone to keeping current or you buy Starburst Enterprise for a supported long-term version.
- It is memory-based and disk spilling was deprecated in favour of fault-tolerant execution, so a query exceeding cluster memory fails outright rather than degrading; enabling fault-tolerant execution requires an external exchange store on object storage and makes queries measurably slower.
- It is a query engine and not a warehouse: there is no built-in job scheduling, no incremental materialised view maintenance and no transformation framework, so producing curated tables still needs dbt or an equivalent layer that somebody has to own.
- The 2020 fork split the ecosystem, so documentation, connectors, Stack Overflow answers and vendor material written before then describe PrestoDB, which is now a different project with different behaviour, and following the wrong one wastes real time.
Pricing, plan by plan
PostHog
Free- FreeFree
- 1M events/month
- 5K sessions/month
- Unlimited users
- Paid$undefined/month
- $0.00031/event
- $0.005/session
- Advanced permissions
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML SSO
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
Trino
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Trino review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PostHog if
- You need product analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want session recording.
Choose Trino if
- You need federated querying.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want connector architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is PostHog or Trino better?
- Neither clearly leads. PostHog starts at Free and Trino at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PostHog or Trino?
- PostHog starts at Free and Trino at Free.
- Does PostHog or Trino run on more platforms?
- PostHog runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Trino runs on Web.
- Can I use PostHog for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PostHog best used for?
- PostHog is most often used for product analytics, feature experimentation, user behavior tracking, a/b testing. Of those, product analytics and feature experimentation are not what Trino is typically brought in for.
- What can PostHog do that Trino cannot?
- PostHog covers Product analytics, Session recording, Feature flags, A/B testing. Trino covers Federated querying, Connector architecture, Predicate and aggregation pushdown, Massively parallel execution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PostHog: What does PostHog's free tier include per month?
PostHog free tier includes: 1M analytics events, 5K session replays, 1M feature flag requests, 100K error tracking exceptions, 1,500 survey responses, 1M data warehouse rows, 10K data pipeline events, 100K AI observability events, 500 PostHog AI credits, 10K workflow messages, and 10GB log ingestion. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceTrino: What is the difference between Trino and Presto?
They share an origin. The original creators left Meta and renamed their fork from PrestoSQL to Trino in December 2020; PrestoDB continues separately under the Linux Foundation. They have diverged in features, connectors and SQL behaviour, so material written for one may not apply to the other.
PostHog: How much data retention does PostHog provide on paid plans?
PostHog free tier provides 1-year data retention. Pay-as-you-go plans offer 7-year data retention across all projects, enabling longer historical analysis. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceTrino: Does Trino replace my data warehouse?
Not on its own. It is compute without storage, scheduling or transformation. Paired with Iceberg or Delta on object storage and something like dbt for modelling it can serve as a lakehouse; used alone it is a query layer over what you already have.
PostHog: What percentage of PostHog users stay on the free tier?
PostHog states that 97% of companies use PostHog for free, indicating extensive free tier adoption. However, specific per-unit pricing rates for overages on paid plans are not published. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceTrino: Why is my federated query slow?
Usually because a connector could not push a filter or aggregation down, so Trino is pulling whole tables across the network to join them itself. The fix is usually better source-side partitioning or statistics, or ingesting that source rather than federating it.
PostHog: When does PostHog provide priority support on paid plans?
PostHog provides email or Slack support for accounts exceeding $2,000/month on pay-as-you-go plans. Specific response times and support SLAs are not detailed on their pricing page. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceTrino: What happens when a query runs out of memory?
It fails. Disk spilling was deprecated in favour of fault-tolerant execution, which checkpoints to an external exchange store such as S3 and lets long queries survive memory pressure and worker loss, at the cost of noticeably slower execution.
Trino: Is there commercial support?
Yes, from Starburst, which offers Starburst Enterprise with long-term supported releases and Starburst Galaxy as a managed service. The open source project itself has no long-term support line.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- PostHog vs Mixpanel
- PostHog vs Amplitude
- PostHog vs LaunchDarkly
- PostHog vs Heap
- PostHog vs ClickUp
- PostHog vs Asana
- PostHog vs Figma
- PostHog vs Linear
- PostHog vs GitHub
- PostHog vs LogRocket
- PostHog vs Plane
- PostHog vs Storybook
- PostHog vs Microsoft Edge
- PostHog vs Netlify
- PostHog vs Productboard
- PostHog vs Sentry
- PostHog vs Aha!
- PostHog vs Thought Machine
- PostHog vs Apache Hadoop
- PostHog vs Safari
- PostHog vs Apache Spark
- PostHog vs etcd
- PostHog vs Honeycomb
- PostHog vs Istio
- PostHog vs Postgres
- PostHog vs Canny
- PostHog vs Close
- Trino vs Mixpanel
- Trino vs Amplitude
- Trino vs LaunchDarkly
- Trino vs Heap
- Trino vs ClickUp
- Trino vs Asana
- Trino vs Figma
- Trino vs Linear
- Trino vs GitHub
- Trino vs LogRocket
- Trino vs Plane
- Trino vs Storybook
- Trino vs Microsoft Edge
- Trino vs Netlify
- Trino vs Productboard
- Trino vs Sentry
- Trino vs Aha!
- Trino vs Thought Machine
- Trino vs Apache Hadoop
- Trino vs Safari
- Trino vs Apache Spark
- Trino vs etcd
- Trino vs Honeycomb
- Trino vs Istio
- Trino vs Postgres
- Trino vs Canny
- Trino vs Close
