CAD · head to head
Plasticity vs Zoo

Zoo
CAD
Cloud CAD with a scripting language and a geometry engine exposed as an API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Zoo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Plasticity limited plugin ecosystem compared to Rhino; fewer third-party extensions available; Zoo the geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- They diverge on capability: Plasticity covers Smooth surface modeling, Zoo covers KCL scripting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Plasticity and Zoo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Plasticity | Zoo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API |
| Founded | 2023 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Plasticity
- Smooth surface modeling
- Fillet operations
- Boolean operations
- Mesh export
- Fast workflow
- Artist-friendly
- Blender
- Game engines
Only in Zoo
- KCL scripting
- Design Studio
- Design API
- Zookeeper agent
- Format conversion
- Open source client
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Plasticity
- Concept designnot Zoo
- Hard surface modelingnot Zoo
Zoo
- A hardware startup that wants part models reviewed in pull requests alongside firmwarenot Plasticity
- A software team generating thousands of parametric part variants programmatically rather than by handnot Plasticity
- A SaaS product that needs to render and convert customer CAD files without licensing a geometry kernelnot Plasticity
- An engineer who models occasional brackets and enclosures and does not want a four figure annual seatnot Plasticity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Plasticity
- Limited plugin ecosystem compared to Rhino; fewer third-party extensions available
- Young product with shorter track record; fewer industry case studies and community resources
- No parametric history tree; may require different workflow for some users accustomed to feature-based modeling
- Premium pricing for Indie users despite being positioned as affordable alternative
Zoo
- The geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- STEP and SLDPRT import are still labelled experimental, which means the most common way of receiving a supplier or customer model is the least reliable path into the tool.
- Drawing production, GD&T and tolerance annotation are far behind SolidWorks, Creo and NX, so most users still need a second package to release a manufacturing drawing.
- Zookeeper is billed in reasoning minutes rather than per seat, so a team cannot forecast next month's bill from headcount the way it can with conventional CAD subscriptions.
- The open source label applies only to the Design Studio client; the kernel that does the modelling is closed and hosted, so forking the repository does not give you a product you can run yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Plasticity
On request- Indie$149/one-time
Zoo
Free- FreeFree
- Design Studio access
- About 20 minutes of Zookeeper reasoning per month
- Around $10 of API calls included
- Plus$20/month
- Roughly 400 Zookeeper minutes per month
- Pay as you go beyond the allowance
- Design Studio and API access
- Pro$99/month
- Unlimited Zookeeper reasoning
- Higher API allowance
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Plasticity if
- You need smooth surface modeling.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu.
- You also want fillet operations.
Choose Zoo if
- You need kcl scripting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- You also want design studio.
Questions people ask
- Is Plasticity or Zoo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Plasticity starts at On request and Zoo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Plasticity or Zoo?
- Zoo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Plasticity and Free for Zoo.
- Does Plasticity or Zoo run on more platforms?
- Plasticity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu. Zoo runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- Can I use Zoo for free?
- Yes. Zoo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Plasticity starts at On request.
- What is Plasticity best used for?
- Plasticity is most often used for concept design, hard surface modeling. Of those, concept design and hard surface modeling are not what Zoo is typically brought in for.
- What can Plasticity do that Zoo cannot?
- Plasticity covers Smooth surface modeling, Fillet operations, Boolean operations, Mesh export. Zoo covers KCL scripting, Design Studio, Design API, Zookeeper agent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Plasticity: What is Plasticity designed for?
Plasticity is a NURBS-based 3D modeler designed for concept and product design, prioritizing an artist-friendly workflow over parametric history-based modeling.
SourceZoo: Is Zoo the same company as KittyCAD?
Yes. KittyCAD renamed itself Zoo; the GitHub organisation is still KittyCAD and the scripting language KCL keeps the old initials.
Plasticity: What platforms does Plasticity support?
Plasticity runs on Windows, macOS (Intel and M-Series), Linux, and Ubuntu using Parasolid's geometric modeling kernel.
SourceZoo: Can I use Zoo without an internet connection?
No. The geometry engine is a cloud service, so Design Studio needs a live connection to model anything.
Plasticity: What is the pricing model for Plasticity?
Plasticity is a one-time purchase: Indie tier costs $149 and Studio tier is available at a higher price point. A 30-day free trial is available.
SourceZoo: Is Design Studio free?
There is a genuine free tier with a small monthly allowance of AI reasoning and API calls. Paid plans start at $20 per month.
Plasticity: Does Plasticity integrate with Blender?
Yes. Plasticity includes a Blender Bridge add-on that enables live-linking between Plasticity and Blender, allowing you to preview Plasticity models inside Blender with proper materials and lighting.
SourceZoo: Can I replace SolidWorks with Zoo?
Not for drawing release, large assemblies or GD&T. Teams typically use Zoo for programmatic part generation and keep an established package for production documentation.
Plasticity: What key features distinguish Plasticity from other CAD tools?
Plasticity features streamlined UI with context-sensitive widgets, chordal fillets, key bindings familiar to Blender users, radial menus, Dimension and Measure commands for absolute constraints, and handles complex Boolean operations on dense geometry.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Plasticity vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Plasticity vs Rhino 3D
- Plasticity vs V-Ray
- Plasticity vs 3D-Coat
- Plasticity vs FreeCAD
- Plasticity vs PrusaSlicer
- Plasticity vs Siemens NX
- Plasticity vs Lumion
- Plasticity vs Twinmotion
- Plasticity vs Shapr3D
- Plasticity vs ZBrush
- Plasticity vs Mudbox
- Plasticity vs Vectorworks
- Plasticity vs Houdini
- Plasticity vs OnShape
- Plasticity vs Inventor
- Plasticity vs IronCAD
- Plasticity vs Bentley MicroStation
- Plasticity vs SolveSpace
- Plasticity vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Plasticity vs BricsCAD
- Plasticity vs Creo
- Plasticity vs Carlson Software
- Plasticity vs Alibre Design
- Plasticity vs Nomad Sculpt
- Plasticity vs nTop
- Plasticity vs Octane Render
- Plasticity vs RealityScan
- Plasticity vs Solid Edge
- Plasticity vs Tinkercad
- Zoo vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Zoo vs Rhino 3D
- Zoo vs V-Ray
- Zoo vs 3D-Coat
- Zoo vs FreeCAD
- Zoo vs PrusaSlicer
- Zoo vs Siemens NX
- Zoo vs Lumion
- Zoo vs Twinmotion
- Zoo vs Shapr3D
- Zoo vs ZBrush
- Zoo vs Mudbox
- Zoo vs Vectorworks
- Zoo vs Houdini
- Zoo vs OnShape
- Zoo vs Inventor
- Zoo vs IronCAD
- Zoo vs Bentley MicroStation
- Zoo vs SolveSpace
- Zoo vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Zoo vs BricsCAD
- Zoo vs Creo
- Zoo vs Carlson Software
- Zoo vs Alibre Design
- Zoo vs Nomad Sculpt
- Zoo vs nTop
- Zoo vs Octane Render
- Zoo vs RealityScan
- Zoo vs Solid Edge
- Zoo vs Tinkercad

