CAD · head to head
Carlson Software vs Zoo

Carlson Software
CAD
Survey and civil design CAD sold as a perpetual licence with optional maintenance
- From
- $4450/one-time
- Rated
- -

Zoo
CAD
Cloud CAD with a scripting language and a geometry engine exposed as an API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Zoo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Carlson Software the perpetual licence is a larger upfront cost than a first-year subscription, which is harder to approve for a practice with tight cash flow even though it is cheaper over five years.; Zoo the geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- They diverge on capability: Carlson Software covers Survey data reduction, Zoo covers KCL scripting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Carlson Software and Zoo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Carlson Software | Zoo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4450/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Carlson Software
- Survey data reduction
- Civil design
- Hydrology
- GIS module
- Earthwork takeoff
- IntelliCAD engine included
- AutoCAD compatibility
- SurvCE field software
Only in Zoo
- KCL scripting
- Design Studio
- Design API
- Zookeeper agent
- Format conversion
- Open source client
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Carlson Software
- A small surveying practice that wants to stop paying an annual Civil 3D subscription and own its CAD outrightnot Zoo
- A firm running mixed instrument brands in the field that needs data collector software not tied to one manufacturernot Zoo
- A civil consultancy doing road, site grading and stormwater design without needing an enterprise BIM environmentnot Zoo
- A land development office that renews maintenance only in years when a release actually adds something it needsnot Zoo
Zoo
- A hardware startup that wants part models reviewed in pull requests alongside firmwarenot Carlson Software
- A software team generating thousands of parametric part variants programmatically rather than by handnot Carlson Software
- A SaaS product that needs to render and convert customer CAD files without licensing a geometry kernelnot Carlson Software
- An engineer who models occasional brackets and enclosures and does not want a four figure annual seatnot Carlson Software
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Carlson Software
- The perpetual licence is a larger upfront cost than a first-year subscription, which is harder to approve for a practice with tight cash flow even though it is cheaper over five years.
- It is Windows only, so a practice on macOS has to run virtualisation, and there is no browser or mobile design client.
- Carlson is a smaller ecosystem than Autodesk, so hiring staff who already know it is harder and training time is a real cost when a new surveyor joins.
- Skipping maintenance saves money but leaves you on an old release, and when a client eventually sends a file from a much newer version the compatibility gap becomes your problem to solve.
- Pricing is largely sold through resellers with figures varying by dealer and region, so the published $4,450 Civil Suite price is a reference point rather than a firm quote.
Zoo
- The geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- STEP and SLDPRT import are still labelled experimental, which means the most common way of receiving a supplier or customer model is the least reliable path into the tool.
- Drawing production, GD&T and tolerance annotation are far behind SolidWorks, Creo and NX, so most users still need a second package to release a manufacturing drawing.
- Zookeeper is billed in reasoning minutes rather than per seat, so a team cannot forecast next month's bill from headcount the way it can with conventional CAD subscriptions.
- The open source label applies only to the Design Studio client; the kernel that does the modelling is closed and hosted, so forking the repository does not give you a product you can run yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Carlson Software
$4450/one-time- Civil Suite$4450/one-time
- Survey, Civil, Hydrology and GIS modules
- Perpetual licence
- IntelliCAD engine included
- Individual modules$undefined/one-time
- Survey, Civil, Hydrology, GIS or Takeoff purchased separately
- Perpetual licence
- Pricing varies by module and reseller
- Annual maintenance$undefined/year
- Approximately 10 per cent of purchase price
- Optional, software continues running without it
- Provides version updates and support
Zoo
Free- FreeFree
- Design Studio access
- About 20 minutes of Zookeeper reasoning per month
- Around $10 of API calls included
- Plus$20/month
- Roughly 400 Zookeeper minutes per month
- Pay as you go beyond the allowance
- Design Studio and API access
- Pro$99/month
- Unlimited Zookeeper reasoning
- Higher API allowance
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Carlson Software if
- You need survey data reduction.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want civil design.
Choose Zoo if
- You need kcl scripting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- You also want design studio.
Questions people ask
- Is Carlson Software or Zoo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Carlson Software starts at $4450/one-time and Zoo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Carlson Software or Zoo?
- Zoo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $4450/one-time for Carlson Software and Free for Zoo.
- Does Carlson Software or Zoo run on more platforms?
- Carlson Software runs on Windows. Zoo runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- Can I use Zoo for free?
- Yes. Zoo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Carlson Software starts at $4450/one-time.
- What is Carlson Software best used for?
- Carlson Software is most often used for a small surveying practice that wants to stop paying an annual civil 3d subscription and own its cad outright, a firm running mixed instrument brands in the field that needs data collector software not tied to one manufacturer, a civil consultancy doing road, site grading and stormwater design without needing an enterprise bim environment, a land development office that renews maintenance only in years when a release actually adds something it needs. Of those, a small surveying practice that wants to stop paying an annual civil 3d subscription and own its cad outright and a firm running mixed instrument brands in the field that needs data collector software not tied to one manufacturer are not what Zoo is typically brought in for.
- What can Carlson Software do that Zoo cannot?
- Carlson Software covers Survey data reduction, Civil design, Hydrology, GIS module. Zoo covers KCL scripting, Design Studio, Design API, Zookeeper agent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Carlson Software: Is Carlson a perpetual licence?
Yes. You buy it once and it keeps running. Annual maintenance at roughly ten per cent is optional and only affects updates and support.
Zoo: Is Zoo the same company as KittyCAD?
Yes. KittyCAD renamed itself Zoo; the GitHub organisation is still KittyCAD and the scripting language KCL keeps the old initials.
Carlson Software: Do I need AutoCAD as well?
No. An IntelliCAD engine is included. You can alternatively run Carlson on top of AutoCAD if your practice already licenses it.
Zoo: Can I use Zoo without an internet connection?
No. The geometry engine is a cloud service, so Design Studio needs a live connection to model anything.
Carlson Software: Does Carlson field software work with other brands of instrument?
Yes. SurvCE supports total stations and GNSS receivers from several manufacturers, which is one of the main reasons firms choose it.
Zoo: Is Design Studio free?
There is a genuine free tier with a small monthly allowance of AI reasoning and API calls. Paid plans start at $20 per month.
Carlson Software: What does the Civil Suite include?
Survey, Civil, Hydrology and GIS, listed at $4,450.
Zoo: Can I replace SolidWorks with Zoo?
Not for drawing release, large assemblies or GD&T. Teams typically use Zoo for programmatic part generation and keep an established package for production documentation.
Related pages
More on Carlson Software
Other head to heads
- Carlson Software vs Bentley MicroStation
- Carlson Software vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Carlson Software vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Carlson Software vs SolveSpace
- Carlson Software vs Creo
- Carlson Software vs Inventor
- Carlson Software vs Alibre Design
- Carlson Software vs BricsCAD
- Carlson Software vs IronCAD
- Carlson Software vs RealityScan
- Carlson Software vs ZBrush
- Carlson Software vs ANSYS Fluent
- Carlson Software vs Tinkercad
- Carlson Software vs Arnold
- Carlson Software vs Mudbox
- Carlson Software vs FreeCAD
- Carlson Software vs OnShape
- Carlson Software vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Carlson Software vs Nomad Sculpt
- Carlson Software vs nTop
- Carlson Software vs Octane Render
- Carlson Software vs Solid Edge
- Zoo vs Bentley MicroStation
- Zoo vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Zoo vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Zoo vs SolveSpace
- Zoo vs Creo
- Zoo vs Inventor
- Zoo vs Alibre Design
- Zoo vs BricsCAD
- Zoo vs IronCAD
- Zoo vs RealityScan
- Zoo vs ZBrush
- Zoo vs ANSYS Fluent
- Zoo vs Tinkercad
- Zoo vs Arnold
- Zoo vs Mudbox
- Zoo vs FreeCAD
- Zoo vs OnShape
- Zoo vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Zoo vs Nomad Sculpt
- Zoo vs nTop
- Zoo vs Octane Render
- Zoo vs Solid Edge
