CAD · head to head
FreeCAD vs Zoo

Zoo
CAD
Cloud CAD with a scripting language and a geometry engine exposed as an API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FreeCAD no pricing published; product is completely free and open-source; Zoo the geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- They diverge on capability: FreeCAD covers Parametric modeling, Zoo covers KCL scripting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FreeCAD and Zoo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FreeCAD
- Parametric modeling
- Part design
- Assembly
- Drafting
- FEM simulation
- Path/CAM
- Architecture
- BIM
Only in Zoo
- KCL scripting
- Design Studio
- Design API
- Zookeeper agent
- Format conversion
- Open source client
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FreeCAD
- Mechanical engineering designnot Zoo
- Architectural modellingnot Zoo
- Product design and prototypingnot Zoo
- CAM/CNC path generationnot Zoo
Zoo
- A hardware startup that wants part models reviewed in pull requests alongside firmwarenot FreeCAD
- A software team generating thousands of parametric part variants programmatically rather than by handnot FreeCAD
- A SaaS product that needs to render and convert customer CAD files without licensing a geometry kernelnot FreeCAD
- An engineer who models occasional brackets and enclosures and does not want a four figure annual seatnot FreeCAD
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FreeCAD
- No pricing published; product is completely free and open-source
- Donations are optional and voluntary for project support
Zoo
- The geometry engine runs entirely in Zoo's cloud and there is no offline mode, so an aircraft, a customer site with no guest wifi or an outage stops modelling work completely.
- STEP and SLDPRT import are still labelled experimental, which means the most common way of receiving a supplier or customer model is the least reliable path into the tool.
- Drawing production, GD&T and tolerance annotation are far behind SolidWorks, Creo and NX, so most users still need a second package to release a manufacturing drawing.
- Zookeeper is billed in reasoning minutes rather than per seat, so a team cannot forecast next month's bill from headcount the way it can with conventional CAD subscriptions.
- The open source label applies only to the Design Studio client; the kernel that does the modelling is closed and hosted, so forking the repository does not give you a product you can run yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
FreeCAD
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the FreeCAD review.
Zoo
Free- FreeFree
- Design Studio access
- About 20 minutes of Zookeeper reasoning per month
- Around $10 of API calls included
- Plus$20/month
- Roughly 400 Zookeeper minutes per month
- Pay as you go beyond the allowance
- Design Studio and API access
- Pro$99/month
- Unlimited Zookeeper reasoning
- Higher API allowance
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose FreeCAD if
- You need parametric modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want part design.
Choose Zoo if
- You need kcl scripting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- You also want design studio.
Questions people ask
- Is FreeCAD or Zoo better?
- Neither clearly leads. FreeCAD starts at Free and Zoo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FreeCAD or Zoo?
- FreeCAD starts at Free and Zoo at Free.
- Does FreeCAD or Zoo run on more platforms?
- FreeCAD runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Zoo runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, API.
- Can I use FreeCAD for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FreeCAD best used for?
- FreeCAD is most often used for mechanical engineering design, architectural modelling, product design and prototyping, cam/cnc path generation. Of those, mechanical engineering design and architectural modelling are not what Zoo is typically brought in for.
- What can FreeCAD do that Zoo cannot?
- FreeCAD covers Parametric modeling, Part design, Assembly, Drafting. Zoo covers KCL scripting, Design Studio, Design API, Zookeeper agent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FreeCAD: How much does FreeCAD cost?
FreeCAD is completely free with no licensing fees, vendor lock-in, sign-up requirements, paywalls, or restrictions. The software is open-source and available for anyone to use and adapt.
SourceZoo: Is Zoo the same company as KittyCAD?
Yes. KittyCAD renamed itself Zoo; the GitHub organisation is still KittyCAD and the scripting language KCL keeps the old initials.
FreeCAD: Does FreeCAD offer optional support or sponsorship?
FreeCAD accepts voluntary donations to support the project. Sponsorship tiers range from $1 per month (Normal Sponsor) to $200 per month (Gold Sponsor), with different visibility levels. One-time donations of any amount are also accepted.
SourceZoo: Can I use Zoo without an internet connection?
No. The geometry engine is a cloud service, so Design Studio needs a live connection to model anything.
Zoo: Is Design Studio free?
There is a genuine free tier with a small monthly allowance of AI reasoning and API calls. Paid plans start at $20 per month.
Zoo: Can I replace SolidWorks with Zoo?
Not for drawing release, large assemblies or GD&T. Teams typically use Zoo for programmatic part generation and keep an established package for production documentation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FreeCAD vs SolveSpace
- FreeCAD vs OpenSCAD
- FreeCAD vs Alibre Design
- FreeCAD vs PrusaSlicer
- FreeCAD vs Ultimaker Cura
- FreeCAD vs Creo
- FreeCAD vs KiCad
- FreeCAD vs IronCAD
- FreeCAD vs Siemens NX
- FreeCAD vs Inventor
- FreeCAD vs OnShape
- FreeCAD vs Shapr3D
- FreeCAD vs Houdini
- FreeCAD vs ZBrush
- FreeCAD vs ANSYS Fluent
- FreeCAD vs Arnold
- FreeCAD vs Bentley MicroStation
- FreeCAD vs MicroSurvey CAD
- FreeCAD vs BricsCAD
- FreeCAD vs Carlson Software
- FreeCAD vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- FreeCAD vs Nomad Sculpt
- FreeCAD vs nTop
- FreeCAD vs Octane Render
- FreeCAD vs RealityScan
- FreeCAD vs Solid Edge
- FreeCAD vs Tinkercad
- Zoo vs SolveSpace
- Zoo vs OpenSCAD
- Zoo vs Alibre Design
- Zoo vs PrusaSlicer
- Zoo vs Ultimaker Cura
- Zoo vs Creo
- Zoo vs KiCad
- Zoo vs IronCAD
- Zoo vs Siemens NX
- Zoo vs Inventor
- Zoo vs OnShape
- Zoo vs Shapr3D
- Zoo vs Houdini
- Zoo vs ZBrush
- Zoo vs ANSYS Fluent
- Zoo vs Arnold
- Zoo vs Bentley MicroStation
- Zoo vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Zoo vs BricsCAD
- Zoo vs Carlson Software
- Zoo vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Zoo vs Nomad Sculpt
- Zoo vs nTop
- Zoo vs Octane Render
- Zoo vs RealityScan
- Zoo vs Solid Edge
- Zoo vs Tinkercad

