File Storage & Backup · head to head
Tresorit vs Wasabi

Tresorit
File Storage & Backup
Store, sync, and share sensitive files with end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Wasabi
Cloud & Infrastructure
Hot cloud storage without egress fees
- From
- $7.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tresorit business plan requires a minimum of 3 users and Business Pro requires a minimum of 5 users; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tresorit and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tresorit
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tresorit
No use cases recorded yet. See the Tresorit review.
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Tresorit
- Media storagenot Tresorit
- Archive replacementnot Tresorit
- Ransomware protectionnot Tresorit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tresorit
- Business plan requires a minimum of 3 users and Business Pro requires a minimum of 5 users
- The Professional plan is single-user only, so a solo account cannot invite teammates without upgrading to a multi-seat tier
- None of the four tiers publish an exact price on the pricing page itself; all show per-month placeholders with the figure omitted and require going through checkout to see a number
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Tresorit
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Tresorit review.
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Tresorit if
Nothing in the data separates Tresorit from Wasabi on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Tresorit or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tresorit starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tresorit or Wasabi?
- Tresorit starts at On request and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Tresorit or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Tresorit runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What can Tresorit do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tresorit vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Tresorit vs Carbonite
- Tresorit vs Backblaze
- Tresorit vs Barracuda Backup
- Tresorit vs Arq Backup
- Tresorit vs CrashPlan
- Tresorit vs Duplicati
- Tresorit vs Zerto
- Tresorit vs Box
- Tresorit vs IDrive
- Tresorit vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Tresorit vs Nextcloud
- Tresorit vs pCloud
- Tresorit vs Sync.com
- Tresorit vs TrueNAS
- Tresorit vs Veritas NetBackup
- Tresorit vs Grafana Cloud
- Tresorit vs Neon
- Tresorit vs DigitalOcean
- Tresorit vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Tresorit vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Tresorit vs Deno Deploy
- Tresorit vs Heroku
- Tresorit vs Hetzner Cloud
- Tresorit vs Linode
- Tresorit vs Packer
- Tresorit vs Pulumi
- Tresorit vs Render
- Tresorit vs Upstash
- Tresorit vs Vagrant
- Tresorit vs Vultr
- Tresorit vs Akamai
- Tresorit vs Alibaba Cloud
- Tresorit vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs Backblaze
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Duplicati
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs Box
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Veritas NetBackup
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef
