APIs · head to head
Ozone API vs Solaris

Ozone API
APIs
Standards-compliant open banking API layer for banks and regulators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Solaris
APIs
German banking as a service with a full banking licence and a live regulatory problem
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ozone API it provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.; Solaris baFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.
- They diverge on capability: Ozone API covers Multi-standard support, Solaris covers German banking licence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ozone API and Solaris actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ozone API
- Multi-standard support
- Consent management
- Developer portal
- Regulatory reporting
- Premium API monetisation
- Deployment flexibility
Only in Solaris
- German banking licence
- IBAN accounts
- Card issuing
- Lending as a service
- Digital assets and custody
- SEPA payments
- KYC and onboarding
- Deposit protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ozone API
- A building society facing an open banking compliance deadline with no API team of its ownnot Solaris
- A bank operating in several jurisdictions that must satisfy different open banking standards at oncenot Solaris
- A regulator or standards body building national open finance infrastructurenot Solaris
- A bank wanting to sell premium APIs beyond the regulatory minimum without building entitlement plumbingnot Solaris
Solaris
- A retailer or platform launching a German current account or card product without applying for its own licencenot Ozone API
- A fintech that needs deposit taking and lending, which an e-money licence cannot providenot Ozone API
- A European business needing German IBANs because customers reject foreign IBANs for salary and direct debitnot Ozone API
- A company requiring German statutory deposit protection on customer balances as a product claimnot Ozone API
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ozone API
- It provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.
- Value is driven by regulatory obligation, so an institution not under a mandate struggles to build a business case for the spend.
- It is a small UK vendor selling to large regulated institutions, which raises procurement and vendor viability questions during bank due diligence.
- Premium API monetisation is a genuine capability but few banks have found real demand, so revenue projections used to justify the purchase often do not materialise.
- Standards evolve continuously and each revision means a change programme in your own systems, even where Ozone absorbs the specification work at the API edge.
Solaris
- BaFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.
- BaFin fined Solaris EUR 6.5 million in March 2024 for systematically late suspicious activity reports and EUR 500,000 for breaching large exposure limits between January 2022 and March 2024, which is a track record a partner inherits reputationally.
- Solaris has previously needed BaFin approval before onboarding new corporate clients, which can turn a commercial decision to launch into a regulatory timetable outside your control.
- The 2024 restructuring involved job cuts and the closure of parts of a business unit, so product lines a partner depends on may not have the engineering behind them that the sales process implies.
- SBI Holdings acquired majority control in 2025, so strategic direction now sits with a Japanese financial group whose priorities for the European business may differ from the roadmap you were sold.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ozone API
On request- Ozone API$undefined/year
- Annual licence or managed service subscription, quoted
- Scaling by institution size, standards in scope and API call volume
- Implementation and core integration charged separately
Solaris
On request- Solaris banking as a service$undefined/year
- Quoted per partner, typically setup fee plus monthly platform fee
- Per account, per card and per transaction charges on top
- Interchange sharing arrangements negotiated per programme
Which should you pick?
Choose Ozone API if
- You need multi-standard support.
- You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
- You also want consent management.
Choose Solaris if
- You need german banking licence.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want iban accounts.
Questions people ask
- Is Ozone API or Solaris better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ozone API starts at On request and Solaris at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ozone API or Solaris?
- Ozone API starts at On request and Solaris at On request.
- Does Ozone API or Solaris run on more platforms?
- Ozone API runs on Web, REST API, Linux. Solaris runs on Web, API.
- What is Ozone API best used for?
- Ozone API is most often used for a building society facing an open banking compliance deadline with no api team of its own, a bank operating in several jurisdictions that must satisfy different open banking standards at once, a regulator or standards body building national open finance infrastructure, a bank wanting to sell premium apis beyond the regulatory minimum without building entitlement plumbing. Of those, a building society facing an open banking compliance deadline with no api team of its own and a bank operating in several jurisdictions that must satisfy different open banking standards at once are not what Solaris is typically brought in for.
- What can Ozone API do that Solaris cannot?
- Ozone API covers Multi-standard support, Consent management, Developer portal, Regulatory reporting. Solaris covers German banking licence, IBAN accounts, Card issuing, Lending as a service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ozone API: Is this a competitor to Plaid or TrueLayer?
No, the opposite side. Ozone is bought by the bank exposing data; Plaid and TrueLayer consume it on behalf of third parties.
Solaris: Does Solaris have a real banking licence?
Yes. Solaris SE is a German credit institution, which is why it can offer deposits and lending, unlike e-money based competitors.
Ozone API: Does it connect to my core banking system?
It provides the standards-compliant API surface and adapters, but connecting your core is an integration project you scope separately.
Solaris: Is the BaFin action still live?
The special representative appointed in 2022 had the mandate extended in July 2024, and fines were issued in March 2024. Treat supervisory oversight as an active condition in your diligence.
Ozone API: Which standards does it support?
UK Open Banking, Berlin Group, FDX, Consumer Data Right and Gulf regional standards, among others, from one platform.
Solaris: Who owns Solaris now?
SBI Holdings of Japan agreed in December 2024 and January 2025 to take a majority stake of over seventy per cent for around EUR 100 million.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ozone API vs TrueLayer
- Ozone API vs Salt Edge
- Ozone API vs Enable Banking
- Ozone API vs Temenos Transact
- Ozone API vs Tink
- Ozone API vs MX Technologies
- Ozone API vs Akoya
- Ozone API vs Sensedia
- Ozone API vs Tribe Payments
- Ozone API vs Bud Financial
- Ozone API vs Synctera
- Ozone API vs Yodlee
- Ozone API vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Ozone API vs Thredd
- Ozone API vs Thunder Client
- Ozone API vs Toqio
- Ozone API vs Tyk
- Ozone API vs Volt
- Ozone API vs Unit
- Ozone API vs Griffin
- Ozone API vs Vodeno
- Ozone API vs Weavr
- Ozone API vs Swan
- Ozone API vs Treasury Prime
- Ozone API vs Fintech Farm
- Ozone API vs Astra
- Ozone API vs Codat
- Ozone API vs Sila
- Ozone API vs LiteLLM
- Ozone API vs Method Financial
- Ozone API vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Ozone API vs Neonomics
- Ozone API vs Payload CMS
- Ozone API vs Portkey
- Solaris vs TrueLayer
- Solaris vs Salt Edge
- Solaris vs Enable Banking
- Solaris vs Temenos Transact
- Solaris vs Tink
- Solaris vs MX Technologies
- Solaris vs Akoya
- Solaris vs Sensedia
- Solaris vs Tribe Payments
- Solaris vs Bud Financial
- Solaris vs Synctera
- Solaris vs Yodlee
- Solaris vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Solaris vs Thredd
- Solaris vs Thunder Client
- Solaris vs Toqio
- Solaris vs Tyk
- Solaris vs Volt
- Solaris vs Unit
- Solaris vs Griffin
- Solaris vs Vodeno
- Solaris vs Weavr
- Solaris vs Swan
- Solaris vs Treasury Prime
- Solaris vs Fintech Farm
- Solaris vs Astra
- Solaris vs Codat
- Solaris vs Sila
- Solaris vs LiteLLM
- Solaris vs Method Financial
- Solaris vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Solaris vs Neonomics
- Solaris vs Payload CMS
- Solaris vs Portkey
