Cloud · head to head
OVHcloud vs Portworx

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OVHcloud public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OVHcloud and Portworx actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OVHcloud
- Public Cloud
- Private Cloud
- Bare Metal Servers
- Managed Kubernetes
- Object Storage
- Block Storage
- Load Balancers
- Databases
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OVHcloud
- Managed Kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applicationsnot Portworx
- Virtual machine instances with customizable CPU, RAM, and IOPSnot Portworx
- Object storage with S3-compatible API for scalable data archivalnot Portworx
- Managed databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and ClickHousenot Portworx
- Private network connectivity with vRack for multi-AZ isolationnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot OVHcloud
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot OVHcloud
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot OVHcloud
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot OVHcloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OVHcloud
- Public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date
- Free network traffic and free Object Storage API calls exclude the Asia-Pacific region
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
OVHcloud
€3.5/month- Public Cloud Starter$3.5/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1 GB RAM
- 10 GB storage
- Bare Metal$49/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full control
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose OVHcloud if
- You need public cloud.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want private cloud.
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is OVHcloud or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OVHcloud or Portworx?
- OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Portworx at $0.33/node hour.
- Does OVHcloud or Portworx run on more platforms?
- OVHcloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli. Portworx runs on Linux.
- What is OVHcloud best used for?
- OVHcloud is most often used for managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications, virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops, object storage with s3-compatible api for scalable data archival, managed databases including postgresql, mysql, mongodb, and clickhouse. Of those, managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications and virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can OVHcloud do that Portworx cannot?
- OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Bare Metal Servers, Managed Kubernetes. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OVHcloud: How does OVHcloud charge for cloud services?
OVHcloud offers pay-as-you-go pricing for compute, storage, and bandwidth. Specific per-unit costs are accessed through the pricing calculator on the vendor site.
SourcePortworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
OVHcloud: Are there savings plans for OVHcloud services?
OVHcloud mentions savings plan options on its services pages, but pricing discounts and commitment terms are not detailed on the homepage.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
OVHcloud: What is the cost of OVHcloud zero inter-AZ fees?
OVHcloud advertises zero inter-AZ (availability zone) fees for data transfers within its network. Monthly subscription rates for individual services are not published on the vendor homepage.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OVHcloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OVHcloud vs DigitalOcean
- OVHcloud vs Grafana Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Neon
- OVHcloud vs Scaleway
- OVHcloud vs Oracle Cloud
- OVHcloud vs IBM Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Lambda
- OVHcloud vs Vultr
- OVHcloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Tencent Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Chef
- OVHcloud vs Rancher
- OVHcloud vs Upstash
- OVHcloud vs Azure Functions
- OVHcloud vs Deno Deploy
- OVHcloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Infracost
- OVHcloud vs OpenEBS
- OVHcloud vs Longhorn
- OVHcloud vs Podman
- OVHcloud vs Packer
- OVHcloud vs Crossplane
- OVHcloud vs Dokku
- OVHcloud vs Encore
- OVHcloud vs Fastly
- OVHcloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- OVHcloud vs K3s
- OVHcloud vs Flux
- OVHcloud vs Vagrant
- OVHcloud vs Kustomize
- OVHcloud vs minikube
- Portworx vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Grafana Cloud
- Portworx vs Neon
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs Oracle Cloud
- Portworx vs IBM Cloud
- Portworx vs Lambda
- Portworx vs Vultr
- Portworx vs Alibaba Cloud
- Portworx vs Tencent Cloud
- Portworx vs Chef
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Upstash
- Portworx vs Azure Functions
- Portworx vs Deno Deploy
- Portworx vs Hetzner Cloud
- Portworx vs Infracost
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube

