Networking · head to head
OpenVPN vs Visual Studio Code

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer; Visual Studio Code requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- They diverge on capability: OpenVPN covers Open source core, Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenVPN and Visual Studio Code actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenVPN | Visual Studio Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source core is free; Access Server billed per simultaneous connection | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces) |
| Category | Networking | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
Only in Visual Studio Code
- IntelliSense
- Debugging
- Built-in Git
- Extensions
- Integrated terminal
- Syntax highlighting
- Code refactoring
- Snippets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Visual Studio Code
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Visual Studio Code
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Visual Studio Code
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
- Code editingnot OpenVPN
- Web developmentnot OpenVPN
- Debuggingnot OpenVPN
- Version controlnot OpenVPN
- Remote developmentnot OpenVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Visual Studio Code
- Requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- Performance can degrade with very large codebases (100,000+ files)
- Git integration is basic; requires extensions for advanced version control workflows
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Visual Studio Code
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Visual Studio Code review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Choose Visual Studio Code if
- You need intellisense.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- You also want debugging.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenVPN or Visual Studio Code better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenVPN starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenVPN or Visual Studio Code?
- OpenVPN starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free.
- Does OpenVPN or Visual Studio Code run on more platforms?
- OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. Visual Studio Code runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenVPN best used for?
- OpenVPN is most often used for a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship, a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee, an organisation with more staff than typical concurrent vpn usage, since access server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accounts, an iot or large-scale deployment needing custom enterprise pricing above 2,000 connections. Of those, a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship and a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee are not what Visual Studio Code is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenVPN do that Visual Studio Code cannot?
- OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier. Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense, Debugging, Built-in Git, Extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Visual Studio Code: Is Visual Studio Code free?
Yes. Visual Studio Code is completely free to use under the MIT license. There are no subscription fees or paid tiers.
SourceOpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Visual Studio Code: Can I use VS Code for remote development?
Yes. The Remote Development extension pack allows development on remote machines via SSH, in containers, or in Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) while using the full VS Code feature set.
SourceOpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Visual Studio Code: How many extensions are available?
The VS Code Marketplace contains thousands of extensions from Microsoft and the community for language support, debuggers, themes, formatters, and productivity tools.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Does VS Code support debugging?
Yes. VS Code includes built-in debugging for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Node.js, and supports debugging for Python, C++, C#, Java, Ruby, Go, PHP, and other languages via extensions.
SourceVisual Studio Code: What operating systems does VS Code support?
VS Code runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with identical features and keybindings across all platforms.
SourceRelated pages
More on Visual Studio Code
Other head to heads
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Ansible
- OpenVPN vs GoLand
- OpenVPN vs Fig
- OpenVPN vs Turborepo
- OpenVPN vs Harness
- OpenVPN vs Buildkite
- OpenVPN vs Argo CD
- OpenVPN vs GitLab CI/CD
- OpenVPN vs HCP Terraform
- OpenVPN vs Helm
- OpenVPN vs GNU Emacs
- OpenVPN vs Keil MDK
- OpenVPN vs Vite
- OpenVPN vs Bazel
- OpenVPN vs Daytona
- OpenVPN vs Depot
- OpenVPN vs PhpStorm
- OpenVPN vs RubyMine
- Visual Studio Code vs pfSense
- Visual Studio Code vs ZeroTier
- Visual Studio Code vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Visual Studio Code vs Tailscale
- Visual Studio Code vs Icinga
- Visual Studio Code vs Zabbix
- Visual Studio Code vs Domotz
- Visual Studio Code vs LibreNMS
- Visual Studio Code vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Visual Studio Code vs Twingate
- Visual Studio Code vs Consul
- Visual Studio Code vs OPNsense
- Visual Studio Code vs Nebula
- Visual Studio Code vs ngrok
- Visual Studio Code vs Palo Alto Networks
- Visual Studio Code vs Splunk
- Visual Studio Code vs Ansible
- Visual Studio Code vs GoLand
- Visual Studio Code vs Fig
- Visual Studio Code vs Turborepo
- Visual Studio Code vs Harness
- Visual Studio Code vs Buildkite
- Visual Studio Code vs Argo CD
- Visual Studio Code vs GitLab CI/CD
- Visual Studio Code vs HCP Terraform
- Visual Studio Code vs Helm
- Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs
- Visual Studio Code vs Keil MDK
- Visual Studio Code vs Vite
- Visual Studio Code vs Bazel
- Visual Studio Code vs Daytona
- Visual Studio Code vs Depot
- Visual Studio Code vs PhpStorm
- Visual Studio Code vs RubyMine

